# Which Blockchain as a Service platforms are highest rated for early-stage teams launching production-grade DApps?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Picking infrastructure early is a bet you're stuck with: choose wrong and you're re-platforming mid-growth. My question for G2 reviewers and researchers: which<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/blockchain-as-a-service"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/blockchain-as-a-service">Blockchain as a Service</a> platforms are highest rated for early-stage teams launching production-grade DApps, where the free tier and the production tier are the same platform? </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The three that rate highest for that profile (per G2 ratings):</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/moralis-web3/reviews"><strong>Moralis Web3</strong></a>: a perfect rating plus the category's top Plugins &amp; APIs (98%) and Scalability (98%) scores. Its managed backend (APIs, indexing, auth) lets a tiny team ship a production DApp with no backend crew. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/chainstack/reviews"><strong>Chainstack</strong></a>: production credentials that hold up (SOC 2 Type II, 99.99%+ uptime, self-healing nodes) and a free tier you prototype on before scaling into paid RPS tiers. Reviewers rate it top of the category on Security (98%). </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/quicknode/reviews"><strong>Quicknode</strong></a>: the most-reviewed high performer here and the satisfaction leader, with a 99.99% SLA and a genuinely usable free tier to launch on.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams who launched something real: which of these did you start on and NOT have to migrate off once you hit production and scale? That "never had to leave" signal is what an early team is actually buying.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Ask vendors whether the limits model stays identical as you scale, just with bigger numbers. That consistency lets early teams write production code from day one without refactoring.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Quicknode&#39;s usable free tier that scales into the same paid product is exactly the kind of setup that would let an early team validate without worrying about a painful migration later.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 9 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Chainstack would give me the most confidence in that “never had to leave” test. Starting on a free tier and then scaling on the same platform with a 99.99%+ uptime commitment and self-healing nodes means an early team can validate the product without choosing infrastructure it already expects to replace at production.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;I was collecting migration stories for a piece a while back and the &quot;never had to leave&quot; cases had one thing in common: the free tier was the production platform in miniature. Same endpoints, same limits model, just bigger numbers as you pay more. All three here roughly pass that test. What actually forced teams to migrate was almost never performance, it was a pricing model change or a rate limit structure that punished their specific traffic shape. So stress the limits model against your expected usage before you commit, not after.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4