Progress Telerik Reviews & Product Details

I appreciate the wide range of controls available in Progress Telerik, which not only offer the basic controls I expect but also include advanced functionalities like file uploads, QR codes, gauges, and charts. This extensive selection of controls provides a highly functional and flexible solution for my web apps, ensuring that I achieve a consistent look and similar behavior across all controls. Additionally, the initial setup of Progress Telerik is very easy, which contributes to a seamless user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like more and simpler examples. Sometimes I find the examples difficult to dissect. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Telerik provides a long list of very rich UI controls beyond the basic, with high extensibility, customization and a variety of functionality we use in almost all web enterprise applications with Visual Studio.

Has a tool for apply themes to the controls, that can be extended for our own internal visual language.

Is sold in packages with different components and tools: reporting tool, sets of controls, testing tools, and for different frameworks (Blazor, Core, MVC, Angular, React, etc.).

Provides a comprehensive set of examples of use of each control, videos, webinars and forums that can guide the developer to get what they want to accomplish from the start. Besides Telerik has and excellent support service. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The downside we have found is some issues when versioning with GitHub apps with Telerik, with have to clarity by now how to overcome. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Telerik’s components—both the original AJAX suite and the newer Kendo UI—have always been rock-solid, well-documented, and feature-rich. They save me countless hours on front-end development and make it easy to deliver polished, professional-looking applications. The Telerik Grid, in particular, is incredibly powerful and customizable. I also ap Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing really! There’s a bit of a learning curve when moving between suites (e.g., from AJAX to Kendo UI), and occasionally the documentation could be clearer for edge cases or advanced configurations. Licensing costs can add up for smaller teams, but the value delivered still justifies the investment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We are using Telerik reporting last 1 year. we use Telerik reporting for crystal report migration. Initially we face couple of challenges because we are new to this technology but after checking Telerik Documentation and support we got from Telerik team we completed the couple of report.

I like most here Telerik Support by 24 hours always get the reply from the with proper solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1.Accessibility Documentation Could Be Clearer – Features like Enable Accessibility and ViewerRenderToolTips are available but making them work effectively with screen readers (such as NVDA) and different PDF viewers (like Adobe Reader vs. Foxit) often requires trial and error. More complete and practical examples would help a lot.

2.Inconsistent Tooltip Support Across Viewers – Tooltips (via AccessibleDescription) show correctly in Foxit PDF Reader but not in Adobe Reader or most browser-based PDF viewers. This inconsistency can create confusion for end users expecting uniform behavior.

3.CanShrink Property in PageHeaderSection – The CanShrink property does not behave the same way in PageHeaderSection as it does in ReportHeaderSection. Even when content is hidden based on conditions, the section height remains, which affects layout. Aligning its behavior with the ReportHeaderSection would provide more layout flexibility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Progress Telerik offers a comprehensive set of well-documented, high-quality UI components that are easy to integrate and customize. The controls are visually appealing, perform well, and the frequent updates ensure compatibility with the latest frameworks. Their technical support is responsive and knowledgeable, which helps resolve issues quickly Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Progress Telerik offers great value, the learning curve for some advanced features can be steep, and the documentation, though extensive, could provide more real-world usage examples. Additionally, the licensing cost may be high for smaller teams or individual developers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is incredibly easy to integrate, and it makes us more productive thanks to its components, which are also easy to customize. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Upgrading from one version to the next can sometimes be challenging when using the ASP.Net version, because you have to make sure the CSS, JS, and NuGet package versions are all aligned. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It provides enhanced controls that users find useful, with little to no extra effort required. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The complexity of RadGridView can be hard to work through, especially when it comes to adding new rows. I think it becomes even more challenging in our case because we’re using unbound data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tech support was very helpful and professional. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I was using WinForms controls. Features are overwhelming. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the variety of controls that Progress Telerik offers, which helps me in winforms programming. I also find that the initial setup is quite easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes there are bugs in the controls and some functions are not compatible with interop. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like that there are plenty of usage examples for each component, which makes it easier to get started. The implementation with Angular is also very smooth, and I use it daily in my projects. It’s very rare that I can’t find a component I need — there seems to be a solution for almost every use case. However, if I need to customize something beyond the basic examples, I usually need to reach out to support. I haven’t really used third-party integrations yet, so I can’t comment on that. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some components have a slightly steep learning curve, especially when it comes to more advanced customizations. Also, the price can feel a bit high for smaller teams or projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.