Juro Pricing Overview

We’ve been using Juro for around 3 years now, and it has become a key part of our legal operations. What I appreciate most is how much the platform keeps evolving. Juro clearly invests a lot in developing the product, and the new AI features are a great example of that — they feel genuinely useful for in-house legal teams and help make contract work faster and more efficient.

The platform is easy to use for creating, collaborating on, signing and managing contracts, and the customer support continues to be excellent. The team is responsive, proactive and regularly helps us get more value out of new features. Overall, Juro feels like a product that is constantly improving in the right direction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is very little I actively dislike. One feature wish would be a deeper native Google Docs integration, similar to the existing Word add-in, so teams working in Google Workspace could collaborate just as smoothly. Overall, this is more of a nice-to-have than a real downside. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Juro for contract management, mainly to send contracts to credit unions for them to sign. It helps me track our contracts more and get signatures through the e-signature platform, so we don't have to use DocuSign. We also integrate it with Salesforce, where we automate some of the post-signature information into our CRM. Our legal team and our clients redline in Juro, and we handle document edits before the contract signature, then they sign within Juro. What I like most is the internal chats. It's sort of nice where you could chat about a specific thing. We do a lot of tagging, so we @mention another coworker if we have a question for them. When you @mention someone, they get an automated email, which is great. We do a lot of editing within the tool that way, @mentioning and writing comments on the internal comments panel. With one template we use a lot, our fin template, if there's conversation about pricing or dates, we can chat and @mention people inside of the template. Our legal team preferred Juro because of the self-service capabilities. They were able to select templates, and they wanted our sales team to be a little bit more in charge of creating contracts for their clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

{"The only thing I don't love about the internal chats is if you @mention someone and they respond by email, they need to @mention in the response. Sometimes the user forgets to do that.","The biggest complaint I get from our sales team is that if someone makes any change to the contract, it resets the approval process. Even if they might be on the third person for approval, it starts back up with the first person.","That reset of the approval process 'definitely causes a headache' because we have multiple people (maybe four or five) that need to approve in order, and restarting approvals is painful.","The approval-reset issue happens frequently. I said it 'probably happens daily' and 'maybe once a day... Five times a week' because we have anywhere between twenty and thirty contracts in the internal approval stage.","Onboarding/setup wasn't simple. We'd give it 'a five out of 10.' We had to redo all the templates that we had in Outlaw and redo them in Juro."} Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.