IBM Engineering Test Management Alternatives & Competitors
(24)4.0 out of 5
Looking for alternatives to IBM Engineering Test Management? Tons of people want Software Testing Tools. What's difficult is finding out whether or not the tool you choose is right for you. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail, UserTesting, and Postman are the most popular alternatives and competitors to IBM Engineering Test Management.
Top Alternatives to IBM Engineering Test Management
- Micro Focus ALM Quality Center
- TestRail
- UserTesting
- Postman
- Tricentis qTest
- ServiceNow Now Platform
- Ranorex Studio
- TestLink
- Micro Focus ALM Quality Center(115)4.0 out of 5
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is a set of software products designed for accelerating the delivery of secure, reliable modern applications
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - TestRail(322)4.2 out of 5
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - UserTesting(500)4.5 out of 5
UserTesting’s Human Insight Platform enables companies to see, hear and talk to their customers as they engage with products, apps and messaging. Half of the world’s top 100 brands partner with UserTesting to make more informed decisions based on customer feedback.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Postman(604)4.6 out of 5
Postman is a software that helps developers and companies develope API workflow, it is efficient on Chrome to test, develop and document APIs and create complex requests, go back in time and view results in a beautiful way.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Tricentis qTest(49)4.2 out of 5
Tricentis qTest is a robust test management solution that makes sophisticated functionality available to all testers at an affordable price.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - ServiceNow Now Platform(248)4.0 out of 5
The Now Platform delivers a System of Action for the enterprise. Using a single data model, it makes it easy to create contextual workflows and automate business processes. The platform's Intelligent Automation Engine combines machine learning with automated actions to dramatically reduce costs and speed time‑to‑resolution.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Ranorex Studio(223)4.2 out of 5
Ranorex Studio allows you to set-up robust test automation scripts for a wide range of desktop, web and mobile applications. For managing and executing automated tests, Ranorex Studio provides a comprehensive range of test automation tools based on standard programming techniques and languages, making them ideal for teams of all sizes.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - TestLink(51)4.6 out of 5
TestLink Open Source Test Management Application
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Zephyr(73)4.1 out of 5Optimized for quick response
Zephyr is an on-demand, cloud based Test Management Platform with innovative applications and unparalleled, metrics based visibility via real time dashboards.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Sauce Labs(128)4.3 out of 5
Sauce's test automation cloud enables QA/QE and developers to easilybperform functional, Javascript unit, and manual tests with Selenium and Appium on web and mobile apps, in 500+ browser/OS combinations. Get videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Apache JMeter(84)4.3 out of 5
Apache JMeter desktop application is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Semaphore(127)4.7 out of 5
Semaphore is a hosted continuous integration and deployment service for open source and private projects.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - TestComplete(85)4.2 out of 5
TestComplete Platform has an open flexible architecture that makes creating, maintaining, and executing automated tests across desktop, web, mobile easy, speedy, and cost effective.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - LambdaTest(116)4.8 out of 5
LambdaTest is scalable cloud based platform designed to offer all software testing needs to cloud infrastructure.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - PractiTest(102)4.2 out of 5
Simple Test Management allows you to Manage all Requirements, Tests, Runs & Issues using one platform
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - SOAPUI(96)4.5 out of 5
SOAPUI is a cross-platform functional testing solution that provides a graphical interface and allows you to create and execute automated functional, regression, compliance, and load tests.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - QMetry Test Management(34)3.9 out of 5
By using QMetry, QA practitioners can help the entire Development team get detailed and granular insights into the state of the Testing cycle, and into other important metrics like Requirements Coverage. QMetry integrates seamlessly with numerous products in adjacent ALM spaces like Defect Tracking, Requirements Management and Test Automation.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Helix ALM(76)3.9 out of 5Optimized for quick response
Helix ALM (formerly TestTrack) is an Agile project management suite that lets you centralize and manage requirements, user stories, test cases, issues, and other development artifacts — and their relationships. Its modular design allows you to buy only what you need: Helix RM for requirements management, Helix IM for issue management and Helix TCM for test case management. As you grow, seamlessly integrate the remaining modules for end-to-end coverage and traceability. Helix ALM also smoothly integrates with JIRA.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Rainforest QA(79)4.4 out of 5
Rainforest QA is an end-to-end Quality Assurance solution that automates regression testing processes with both crowd-based, and proprietary UI based automated testing that can all be run in parallel. Our hosted VM Infrastructure means teams have access to hassle-free cross-browser, mobile, and desktop testing all on one test management platform. Teams leveraging DevOps, Continuous Integration, and Agile love Rainforest because tests are written quickly in Plain English and create fast, reliable and scalable results!
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: - Cypress(70)4.9 out of 5
Cypress offers a test engine that runs unit and integration tests in a browser.
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management:
#1
MA
Setting and Manage test case and test labs are very easy in ALM, you can store results for manual and automated test runs effective for any release. We can also optimize ALM as per our need.
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is:
More usable
Better at support
#2
MM
-Easy to manage and maintain all our test data.
-We can see graphical result of our execution.
-Sharing is easy to other team member
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, TestRail is:
More usable
Better at support
#3
AI
UserTesting allows me to source participants quickly and easily to provide input on my research questions. The platform is flexible and I can run unmoderated or moderated benchmarking sessions,...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, UserTesting is:
Better at support
More usable
#4
NG
1. The best thing about Postman that it is very easy to use with minimal complexities and a lot of functionalities.
2.Also we can create a workspace/team on Postman to work with colleagues and...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Postman is:
More usable
Better at support
Better at meeting requirements
#5
AE
This becomes a test management tool I use for everyday work. It provides an one stop utility for the whole test lifecycle
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Tricentis qTest is:
More usable
Better at support
#6
GP
ServiceNow Now Platform offers many great features and benefits. What I like most about the ServiceNow Now Platform it allows me to effectively and efficiently manage work flows and tasks. In...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, ServiceNow Now Platform is:
Better at support
More usable
#7
MH
The nice solution is already have the system how can I use the platform for regres testing
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Ranorex Studio is:
More usable
Better at support
#8
UI
TestLink allows manually and sometimes even automated test scenarios and thus TestLink is flexible in determining test scripts.
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, TestLink is:
Better at support
More usable
#9
LW
Good business solution for web based analytics
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Zephyr is:
Better at support
More usable
#10
LG
In the event that you are utilizing wdio, you can run tests in saucelabs in minutes Easy Automation for testing and confirmation of programming codes Great help from the site and the network...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Sauce Labs is:
More usable
Better at support
#11
MB
It is very useful to perform performance tests in a very detailed way. Configuration properties can be set by applying them to the samplers that are involved. In my opinion it is more complete than...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Apache JMeter is:
More usable
Better at support
#12
MC
Easy setup file, checked into your GitHub repo. Easy to track (most) changes to the setup of the service. Easy to use diagrams of the block testing process. Github integrating and hooks allow a...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Semaphore is:
Better at support
More usable
Better at meeting requirements
#13
RK
TestComplete brings more focus to the development department. Programmers need to be mindful of how changes in object labeling impact automated testing. TestComplete can be used for different types...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, TestComplete is:
More usable
Better at support
#14
ZA
It’s been a good run till now with LambdaTest. We picked this platform while comparing it with veterans in automation testing platforms. What stays consistent is quality of customer support and the...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, LambdaTest is:
More usable
Better at support
Better at meeting requirements
#15
PD
I like how easy it is to use. It's very intuitive and also allows users from other platforms to hit the ground running. Scripts can be uploaded via spreadsheet.
I also like that I can create test...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, PractiTest is:
Better at support
More usable
#16
SS
I like the ease of testing the API's with Soap UI Software. All we need to do is just enter the API's path/url and add the factors like headers, including some parameters to be added in the URL or...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, SOAPUI is:
More usable
Better at support
Better at meeting requirements
#17
UC
I like the fact that I have easy access to the user guide when I have questions. The user guide is beneficial and usually answers all of my questions. The flow of the software is helpful as it is...Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, QMetry Test Management is:
Better at support
#18
DC
Instant update to use the latest version to make it easy to create new users and licenses, update the fields and text easier to adapt to project requirements, capture errors and testing in one place.
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Helix ALM is:
Better at support
More usable
#19
UH
Because we are short-staffed, it is nice having Rainforest to fall back on. They show you your history of running each test, they have automation as well as tests that utilize human intervention....Read more
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Rainforest QA is:
Better at support
More usable
#20
UC
The information is given when running the tests, the easy setup and time-travelling when stuff goes wrong
Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Cypress is:
More usable
Better at support
Better at meeting requirements
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy