Recursos de Software de Redes de Confianza Cero

Para las empresas de SaaS, la confianza cero no se trata solo de asegurar las redes internas, sino también de proteger el acceso a aplicaciones, APIs y datos de clientes en equipos distribuidos y entornos en la nube.

Así que si estás evaluando cuál es un proveedor de confianza cero confiable para empresas de SaaS, las herramientas que tienden a destacar son aquellas que combinan acceso basado en identidad, conectividad segura de aplicaciones y visibilidad en entornos SaaS. Ahí es donde Okta, Zscaler Private Access y Netskope One Platform suelen aparecer primero, con Cisco Duo a menudo utilizado como una capa de apoyo.

• Okta: A menudo visto como una base para la seguridad SaaS con gestión de identidad y acceso, permitiendo inicio de sesión seguro, SSO y autenticación adaptativa en aplicaciones.
• Zscaler Private Access: Se enfoca en el control de acceso a nivel de aplicación, permitiendo a los usuarios conectarse a aplicaciones internas SaaS y en la nube sin exponer la red más amplia.
• Netskope One Platform: Diseñado para la seguridad en la nube y SaaS, ofreciendo visibilidad y control sobre la actividad del usuario en aplicaciones, junto con capacidades de protección de datos.
• Cisco Duo: Proporciona autenticación multifactor y verificación de usuarios, a menudo superpuesto a otras herramientas para fortalecer la seguridad basada en identidad.

Para los entornos SaaS, ¿cuál termina siendo la capa más crítica: identidad, acceso a aplicaciones o visibilidad de datos?

Unlike remote-first setups, office networks involve shared infrastructure, internal traffic, and a mix of managed and unmanaged devices. If you’re looking for the best zero-trust solution to secure an office network, the tools that stand out are those that can enforce device-level trust, user authentication, and segmented access within the network itself.

That’s where FortiClient, Cisco Duo, Zscaler Private Access, and Absolute Secure Access excel.

• FortiClient (G2: 4.4/5 | 270+ reviews): Often used for endpoint security and secure connectivity, helping ensure that only trusted devices can access the network. It’s practical for managing office devices at scale.
• Cisco Duo (G2: 4.5/5 | 490+ reviews): Adds a strong layer of identity verification, making sure users are authenticated before accessing internal systems, even within the office network.
• Zscaler Private Access (G2: 4.4/5 | 130+ reviews): Shifts access from network-based to application-level control, reducing the risk of lateral movement inside the network. It’s more advanced but aligns closely with zero-trust principles.
• Absolute Secure Access (G2: 4.7/5 | 220+ reviews): Focuses on endpoint resilience and secure connectivity, helping maintain control over devices even if they’re compromised or leave the network.

In an office environment, what actually reduces risk more: stricter device control, stronger user authentication, or limiting access between internal systems?

When small businesses start looking at zero trust, it’s rarely about implementing a full framework overnight. The focus is usually more practical, how to secure access to apps, devices, and networks without adding too much complexity or overhead.

So if you’re figuring out which are the top zero trust network solutions for small businesses, the tools that stand out tend to be the ones that can slot into existing setups quickly while still enforcing basic zero trust principles like identity verification, device trust, and limited access.

A few options that come up consistently in that context are Cisco Duo, GoodAccess, and FortiClient, with ThreatLocker Platform often entering the mix for more controlled environments.

• Cisco Duo: Often the first step into zero trust for many small teams. It focuses on user authentication and access control, making it easier to secure apps and systems without major infrastructure changes.
• GoodAccess: Designed for secure remote access, replacing traditional VPNs with a simpler, cloud-based approach. It’s relatively easy to deploy and manage for distributed teams.
• FortiClient: Combines endpoint protection with secure connectivity, helping small businesses manage device security and network access in one place.
• ThreatLocker Platform: Takes a more restrictive approach with application control and endpoint lockdown, which can significantly reduce risk but may require more upfront configuration.

Do small teams get better outcomes by starting with identity-based tools first, or by locking down endpoints and applications from the beginning?