Canonical LXD
Canonical LXD is a next generation system container manager.It offers a user experience similar to virtual machines but using Linux containers instead.It's image based with pre-made images available for a wide number of Linux distributions and is built around a very powerful, yet pretty simple, REST API.
Average Rating: 4.4/5.0
Total Reviews: 16
How Do G2 Users Rate Canonical LXD?
- Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
- Architecture: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
- File Isolation: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 8.5/10)
- Packaging : 8.8/10 (Category avg: 8.6/10)
Who Is the Company Behind Canonical LXD?
- Seller: Canonical Ltd.
- Year Founded: 2004
- HQ Location: London
-
Twitter: @Canonical
110,908 Twitter followers -
LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
2,067 employees on LinkedIn®
Who Uses This Product?
- Top Industries: Information Technology and Services
- Company Size: 56% Small, 25% Medium
What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Canonical LXD?
AI-generated summary from verified user reviews
Pros
- Users are impressed by the easy-to-use management of containers in Canonical LXD, enhancing their container and VM experience.
- Users love the ease of managing containers with Canonical LXD, enjoying its simplicity and speed.
- Users find the installation process easy with Canonical LXD, appreciating its lightweight and efficient setup.
- Users find Canonical LXD to be a fast and reliable solution for managing Linux Containers and VMs effortlessly.
- Users love the simple management of Canonical LXD, making container handling as easy as virtual machines.
Cons
- Users find the repackaging complexity of ISO files for Windows VMs cumbersome compared to Linux VMs.
- Users find the complex setup of Canonical LXD challenging, particularly for tasks like USB redirection and file mapping.
- The difficult learning curve of Canonical LXD can be challenging initially, but it becomes rewarding with time.
- Users find LXD to be not user-friendly due to its complex, CLI-only interface that lacks intuitiveness.
- Users find the poor UI design of Canonical LXD complicates basic setups, hindering ease of use.
What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Canonical LXD?
"Lightweight, VM-Like Isolation That Makes Multi-Tenant Dev Environments Easy"
Rating: 4.5/5.0 stars
— Suhail C.
Rating: 5.0/5.0 stars
— Sindhura K.
What Are G2 Users Discussing About Canonical LXD?
- Should I use LXC or LXD? - 3 comments, 1 upvote
- What is LXD?
- Is LXD a hypervisor? - 2 comments
- What is LXD used for? - 2 comments

