An open source web interface and source control platform based on Git.
Intruder is a proactive security monitoring platform for internet-facing systems.
Wiz is a CNAPP that consolidates CSPM, KSPM, CWPP, vulnerability management, IaC scanning, CIEM, DSPM, and container and Kubernetes security into a single platform.
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance solutions provide performance, reliability, and security for all of your web applications and APIs, wherever they are hosted and wherever your users are.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a simple way to automate apps and infrastructure. Application Deployment + Configuration Management + Continuous Delivery.
From the beginning, we've worked hand-in-hand with the security community. We continuously optimize Nessus based on community feedback to make it the most accurate and comprehensive vulnerability assessment solution in the market. 20 years later and we're still laser focused on community collaboration and product innovation to provide the most accurate and complete vulnerability data - so you don't miss critical issues which could put your organization at risk. Tenable is a 2021 Gartner Representative Vendor in Vulnerability Assessment.
Gearset is the most trusted DevOps platform with a full suite of powerful solutions for every team developing on Salesforce. Deploy: Achieve fast, reliable metadata and data deployments, including sandbox seeding, Vlocity, CPQ and Flows. Automate: Speed up your end-to-end release management with CI/CD and pipelines, for both regular releases and long term projects. Data management: Securely back up, archive, and restore your data with confidence.
Beagle Security is a web application penetration testing tool that helps you to identify vulnerabilities on your web application before hackers exploit them.
Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.
The best alternatives to StackHawk include GitLab (4.5/5 with 893 reviews), Intruder (4.8/5 with 206 reviews), Wiz (4.7/5 with 795 reviews), and Postman (4.6/5 with 1781 reviews). These alternatives are highly rated and offer strong features in dynamic application security testing and related areas.
StackHawk lacks perimeter scanning and configuration monitoring capabilities, which are offered natively by some alternatives.
Reviewers recommend Intruder for its ease of use, intuitive interface, excellent customer support, and comprehensive vulnerability detection, making it a top choice for SMBs and hybrid cloud environments. Wiz is favored for its comprehensive Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP) capabilities, agentless deployment, and strong risk prioritization, ideal for large-scale multi-cloud environments. GitLab is recommended for its all-in-one DevOps platform with integrated CI/CD and security scanning, providing strong collaboration and automation features. Postman is highly regarded for API testing and collaboration, with a user-friendly interface and powerful automation features that support API lifecycle management effectively.
According to G2 data, StackHawk holds a 0.3-point lead over GitLab in meeting requirements (8.8 vs 9.1), with GitLab slightly ahead. StackHawk scores higher in usability (9.0 vs 8.7) by 0.3 points and significantly outperforms GitLab in support (9.3 vs 8.5) by 0.8 points. StackHawk is also rated easier to administer (8.8 vs 8.6) and easier to do business with (9.1 vs 8.8) by margins of 0.2 and 0.3 points respectively. Conversely, GitLab is rated easier to set up by 0.3 points (8.7 vs 8.4). In terms of user sentiment, GitLab has a larger volume of reviews (893) with an average rating of 4.5/5, while StackHawk has 68 reviews averaging 4.6/5. GitLab users frequently praise its ease of use (40 mentions), extensive features (39 mentions), integrated CI/CD (33 mentions), and collaboration capabilities (31 mentions). StackHawk users highlight easy integrations (4 mentions), scanning efficiency (3 mentions), and excellent customer support (3 mentions). However, StackHawk users note a steeper learning curve and setup complexity, similar to GitLab users who report complexity and a learning curve as cons. Overall, StackHawk excels in support and usability, with strong customer service and configurability, while GitLab offers a comprehensive all-in-one DevOps platform with broader features, especially in CI/CD and collaboration, favored by a larger user base.
Users choose GitLab over StackHawk primarily for its comprehensive all-in-one DevOps platform that integrates source code management, CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, and project management in a single interface. With 893 reviews and a 4.5-star average rating, GitLab is praised for its ease of use (40 mentions), extensive feature set (39 mentions), and seamless collaboration tools (31 mentions). GitLab's built-in CI/CD pipelines are highlighted by 33 reviewers as a major advantage, enabling automation of builds, tests, and deployments directly from the repository, which reduces manual effort and accelerates delivery. The platform's ability to centralize workflows and reduce tool sprawl is a key reason users prefer it, as it simplifies development processes and improves team collaboration. Despite some complexity and a learning curve noted by 20 reviewers, GitLab's scalability, integration capabilities, and robust version control make it the preferred choice for organizations seeking a unified DevOps solution. Users also appreciate GitLab's self-hosting option and strong security features, which contribute to its appeal over StackHawk for broader development lifecycle management.