Real Estate API Pricing Overview

I have used several products, such as the MLS APIs and Public Record APIs, and everything functions smoothly. The API documentation is straightforward and easy to understand. Lukas and the team are always helpful and respond promptly to any inquiries. After trying 4 other API providers that did not perform as well, I chose RealEstateAPI.com. Implementation was easy and pricing is very reasonable as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No complaints here. They are great to work with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Developer documentation is fairly comprehensive and should be accessible to users with a basic technical background or anyone using an AI enabled backend (e.g., Supabase, Neon, etc). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Data accuracy of property lookup results is inaccurate or out of date more often than not. For example, data points like 'property type' and 'units' are consistently incorrect and county recording data is often inconsistent with REAPI search results. I am basin my comments off of a sample size of 2,000-5,000 property lookup searches spread across a range of counties throughout the United States. I have compared the accuracy and utility of REAPI lookup results with those obtained through far cheaper alternatives; the latter (e.g., RentCast) typically outperform REAPI lookup results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.