--- title: PractiTest Reviews meta_title: 'PractiTest Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 233 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how PractiTest works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.3 review_count: 233 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-07-13' parent_category: name: Development url: https://www.g2.com/categories/development --- # PractiTest Reviews **Vendor:** PractiTest **Category:** [Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing) **Average Rating:** 4.3/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 233 ## About PractiTest PractiTest is an AI-powered Test Management and QA Intelligence Platform that goes beyond execution to actual business answers. While tests run, defects get logged, and dashboards fill up, the hardest questions still go unanswered: Are we ready to release? Are we covered where it matters? What's the real risk? PractiTest closes that gap. By turning QA data into clear indicators, insights, and suggested actions, release stakeholders get real-time clarity on risk, coverage, and release readiness. Built on a flexible data structure, agnostic integrations, SmartFox AI, and QA Intelligence, you always know where you stand and can release with confidence. ## PractiTest Pros & Cons **What users like:** - Users appreciate the **ease of use** of PractiTest, benefiting from its intuitive interface and efficient management tools. (20 reviews) - Users appreciate how PractiTest's **centralized organization** streamlines the QA process, enhancing efficiency and collaboration. (13 reviews) - Users appreciate the **effective centralization and organization** of the QA process offered by PractiTest, enhancing efficiency. (9 reviews) - Users value the **easy integration with Jira** , enhancing the connection between test cases and ticket management seamlessly. (9 reviews) - Users appreciate the **quick response time and helpful documentation** from PractiTest's customer support, enhancing their experience. (8 reviews) - Users appreciate the **organized data management** of PractiTest, which offers clear visibility throughout the testing process. (8 reviews) - Users appreciate the **efficient test management** of PractiTest, benefiting from its organization, linking, and reporting capabilities. (8 reviews) - Users appreciate the **seamless integrations** of PractiTest, enhancing organization and productivity through efficient tracking and automation. (7 reviews) - Detailed Reporting (6 reviews) - Helpful (6 reviews) **What users dislike:** - Users often find the **difficult learning curve** challenging, especially with advanced features requiring time to master. (6 reviews) - Users struggle with **filtering issues** that slow down test case management and complicate navigation in PractiTest. (5 reviews) - Users encounter a **steep learning curve** with PractiTest, finding advanced features challenging without proper onboarding. (5 reviews) - Users encounter a **steep learning curve** with PractiTest, making it challenging for new users to navigate effectively. (5 reviews) - Users find the interface **not intuitive** , struggling with cumbersome features that hinder smooth navigation and usability. (4 reviews) - Poor UI Design (4 reviews) - Users find the **slow loading** times frustrating, particularly when navigating through test sets and assigning test cases. (4 reviews) - Authentication Issues (3 reviews) - Complexity (3 reviews) - Inaccuracy (3 reviews) ## PractiTest Reviews ### 1. Check PractiTest if you are looking for an excellent test management tool. **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Olivia T. | Web Developer, Restaurants, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 01, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** PractiTest allowed us to inform our staff member throughout the company on the worth of screening for our service, and eventually for our customers Would be terrific to have a capability to copy-paste actions, however I expected it is currently prepared to include quickly. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** The run status bar offers an easy visual indication on the status of each test. Separating tests based on sprints is perfect when you have thousands of tests to carry out. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** The ability to manage both manual and automated testing on one platform **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Olivia, We thank you dearly for your review. Feedbacks are important for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system base on user requests. We were really happy to hear you are enjoying the system and its capabilities. Thanks again for taking the time to write this review. Best regards, Omri ### 2. It's a very well-thought out workflow that allows for high customization and dashboard data **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Online Media | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 31, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** it's database-oriented which allows for less clutter and more data intensive dashboard views. I love how much customization is allowed and the features were quick to grasp and learn. The customer service is very responsive and they do care about all their customers. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** I do wish for more options on dashboard items and the ability to have more options when updating for cross-projects. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Run a trial with them and ask lots of questions. They are knowledgeable and want to help you achieve higher quality results. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Capturing all of our growing test cases and data and the ability to create dashboards on the fly with minimal time and the ability to share with C level executives publicly. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear PractiTest User, Thank you very much for your review. Feedbacks are crucial for us and we take them very seriously as we constantly trying to improve the functionality of the system based on them. We were very happy to hear of your good experience with the system's customization options and with our customer support team. We have made some changes to our Report Engine Module recently that improved the reporting options of the system. With that said, we would be very happy to hear any specific suggestions you might have for improving the dashboard items. Also, for any options that you think necessary for updating cross-projects data. Again, thanks for taking you taking your time and writing this lovely review, we very much appreciate it. Best Regards, Omri ### 3. PractiTest Review for GSM **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Marketing and Advertising | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** I like PractiTest as it allows my QA Engineers around the world to place there testing efforts in one collective location for each of our sprints and allows Leads like my self to track QA activities. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** In a lot of section i find PractiTest a bit limited. As with any modern QA process the Testing and reporting of testing efforts needs to be extremely functional/flexible. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Need better navigation in Test Sets and more flexible reporting/Dashboards **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** I have QA engineers around the world working on the same projects and sprints and I needed to have a cloud based tool to have them build there testing efforts in a collaborative way. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear PractiTest User, Thank you for your review. Feedbacks are extremely important for us as we are constantly working on improving our system base on user requests. We were pleased to see you are enjoying the centralization of our product and its benefits. We were sorry, on the other hand, to hear about areas in our product that you found limited. We released our new Reporting Engine Module recently in which we added much more functionality and flexibility. With that said, We would be very happy to get any specific points for improvement or get any more ideas from you on how we can improve the system. Thanks again for taking your time and writing this review, we really appreciate it. Best Regards, Omri ### 4. PractiTest Testing Management Tool **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Marialena S. | Software Tester, Broadcast Media, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** That it can easily get integrated with JIRA and it is not very expensive. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** That can't send all data from/to JIRA and that I have to manually add new issues from JIRA to practitest **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** It is easier to manage the whole testing process and keep notes and results for all the tests we've done. Also seeing reports helps us keep track of how many issues are solved etc. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Hello Marialena, Thank you very much for your review. User's Feedbacks are very important for us as we are constantly working on improving the system based on requests we get. We were pleased to see you are enjoying PractiTest integration with Jira. We are working on improving the integration with Jira including the issues import option. Again, thanks for taking your time to write this wonderful review. Best Regards, Omri ### 5. PractiTest Review **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Medical Devices | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Ease of use to create/execute tests. The test creation process is easy to use and something I am very familiar with as having used similar tools in the passed. The flexibility to add fields and report on them is very helpful in building regression suites for our organization. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Integration between modules. When you are executing a test in the test set module and change the test it should automatically update the test in the test library. Also, the tool lacks the ability to create templates for reuse in the filter and reporting functionality. It lacks the ability to upload test results documented in spreadsheets. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Ability to create tests for reuse. This is changing the way we are testing by producing tests from a step point. We can use the tests added into PractiTest to output test cases on a spreadsheet. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear PractiTest User, We thank you dearly for your review. Feedbacks are crucial for us, as we are constantly trying to improve our system based on our user requests. We were happy to hear you find our system intuitive and easy to use. Also, it was good to hear you are enjoying the flexibility of the system and our custom fields system. Regarding the interaction between the different modules, we are planning on changing the process of test execution in the future. in addition, we added the option to create tests directly from a test set and create an exploratory test in the Test Library from within the run. Thanks again for taking the time to write this great review, we highly appreciate it. ### 6. Overall happy with the product **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Veneta A. | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 31, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** I like that it integrates with Jira. I like the admin features. The import tool is a great. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** the UI can be better and more user friendly. I can't split test scripts but would love to. The import tool isn't clear enough on how to use. Of course once you figure it out it works as a charm. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** QA **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Veneta, Thanks a lot for your review. Feedbacks are very important for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system based on them. We were happy to hear you are enjoying the integration between PractiTest and Jira as well as the admin features and the Import module. We would be very happy to hear specific points for improvement regarding the UI and the Import module and clarification regarding splitting test scripts. Thanks again for taking the time to write this review. Best Regards, Omri ### 7. Not very user friendly **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Debbie G. | Owner, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 19, 2017 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** There seems to be a lot you can test on. Nice to be able to place names of who is to take the test and on and by what dates. Everything saves into different folders. You can import pictures to go along with the questions, which is nice. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** I find it not very user friendly to set up and get started. Hard to integrate questions, though you can include pics and other files into the questions.. I have found other products to be more user friendly in setting up exams **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** If you want to have detailed questions , this is for you. If you just want a simple question answer then I would find something else. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** I mostly use this to set homework practice tests for my students. Extra credit and just for practicing. ### 8. Best ALM **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Zion A. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 05, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** PractiTest is a great tool for testing and defect tracking system. I found tool very useful for our use, also PractiTest can work with Jira. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** So far i didn't found something that i dislike. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** We found benefits for traceability. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Zion, First of all, we wanted to thank you for your review we really appreciate your kind words. Feedbacks are important for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system based on them. We were very happy to see you are enjoying PractiTest. Thanks again! Best Regards, Omri ### 9. Endless possibilities with test management and test runs **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Games | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Best thing for me is two-way integration with Jira and endless possibilities for configuration **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Quite some effort was needed to get familiar with your platform and to use it as intended. However, your support was great and always helped me. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Test management and test runs. We try to cover full regression for our platform with all test cases needed for testing it. Test runs can be configured quite simply after you do a first round of setting up all different custom fields etc. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear PractiTest user, Thank you very much for your review. Feedbacks are crucial for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system based on them. We were really happy to hear you are enjoying the possibilities offered by the integration between PraciTest and Jira and our system in general. Best Regards, Omri ### 10. PractiTest review **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Juri M. | Software Test Engineer, Biotechnology, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 04, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** PractiTest allows users to create, run, and manage requirements, test sets, and tests very efficiently. Creating and exporting reports is easy, which is a big plus! **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** User UI is simple, but some button placements and navigation could be improved. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** All software testing is done in one platform, and all runs can be found in PractiTest. This centralised solutions allows easier management of software testing in general. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Juri, First of all, we wanted to thank you for your review. Feedbacks are important for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system based on our customers requests. We were happy to see you are enjoying the centralization of the software and found our different modules efficient. We will be very happy to hear specifics on the areas and buttons you consider as non-intuitive for users. Best Regards, Omri ### 11. crisp test management **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Keerthi N. | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** the simplicity and yet extensive features **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** the ui lacks advanced features to give users seamless performance and usage **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** it gets complicated with usage of too many filters .. structuring could be enhanced **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Hello Keerthi, Thanks a lot for your review. It is very important for us to hear our customers feedbacks as we are constantly trying to improve our system. We would be more than happy to hear your suggestions for improving our UI and details regarding the advanced features that it lacks. Please let us know if you want to review it together over a short web session. Again, thank you very much for your feedback. Best Regards, Omri ### 12. It's a good tool to execute tests but it's a little messy **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Maressa S. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** I like the way the requirements and tests are linked **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** The organization and design are confused **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** We could map our tests and set then in groups to test. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Maressa, First of all, Thanks a lot for your review. Feedbacks are important for us and we are taking them very seriously. We were happy to hear you are enjoying our traceability option. We will be very happy to hear any points you might have for improving the system’s organization and design. Again, thank you for taking the time and writing this review, we highly appreciate it. Kind Regards, Omri ### 13. Usage of Parctitest in my Day-to-Day job. **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Two-way integration between Jira and Practitest ensures the entire team is aware of the impact analysis for any change request within the project/product. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** When the tests are organized into a tree-type folder structure, I expect to see all the test cases related to the parent and its child folders when I access the parent folder. However, it does not display in that way. Filters have the capability to do this. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Organize the test cases. Create a traceability matrix of tests against the development requirements. Make the decision to have a release or not based on the execution reports and bugs against them. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear PractiTest User, First of all, we wanted to thank you for your review. Feedbacks are important for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system based on our customers demands. We were happy to see you are enjoying PractiTest’s integration with Jira and its capabilities. We were sorry to hear about your experience with our folders system. We recommend all our users to use our custom fields and filters over folders in order to organize data as it is a much more convenient way to handle any amount of data. With that said, we do understand users that prefer to use the folders structure and we therefore leave this option available. We will love to hear any other points you might have for improving the system. Best Regards, Omri ### 14. Authoring test cases made feature rich **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Telecommunications | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 31, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** I can add steps and segregate code, bulleted points etc. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Unable to add different types of bullets though and lack of other formatting features offered generally **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Add more test case editing features - ability to insert a table in steps, support - more types of bullets, support - more fonts, sizes and colors.. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Am able to build regression test sets and include specific tests from other modules into one test set while in execution stage. This has proven helpful while running test sets during overall Project regression **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear PractiTest User, First of all, we wanted to thank you for your comment. Feedbacks are important for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system based on our customers demand. At the moment we use Markdown as our text formatting syntax, we apologize if the options available seems insufficient to you. We are considering adding more options for PractiTest’s Markdown base on the number of users requests for that. As said, we base the improvements we make in the system on our user requests, we would be therefore happy if you could give us any specific points for improvement besides the ones you listed in your review. Best Regards, Omri ### 15. Useful and everything in one place **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Anatoli M. | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Organize test cases in one place and reusage in QA and Automation **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Not instinctively user experience and take time to be familiar with the tool **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Keep going :) **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Management of test use cases Reuse current tests **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Hello Anatoli, First of all, thanks a lot for taking the time to write this review. Feedbacks are very important for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system based on demand from our users. We were happy to hear that you find our system useful for organizing test cases and for reusability. We will be happy to hear any ideas you might have for improving the user experience of our system. Again, thank you for your kind words, we highly appreciate it. Kind Regards, Omri ### 16. Pretty Good **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Internet | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Flexibility and an customer facing API for accessing test results **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** I with step start and end times were available in the API **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Add more granularity to API **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Centralized QA of multiple departments **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear User, We thank you for your review. Feedbacks are very important for us as we constantly try to improve the system based on them. We were happy to hear you enjoyed the flexibility of the system as well as well as the API option to access test results. We would love to hear any suggestions you might have for additional API options that you think are necessary. Thanks again for finding the time to write this review, we really appreciate it. Best regards, Omri ### 17. Useful tool **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Anatoli M. | R&D Full-Stack Team Leader, Information Technology and Services, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 31, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** everything in one place and re usage among all teams **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** User experience and UI are not intuitive **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Improve UX/UI **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Reusage and everything in one place **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Anatoli, Thank you for your review. It important for us to receive feedbacks from PractiTest users and improve the system by them. We were pleased to see that you had a good experience with our system as an end to end test management solution. As said, users feedbacks are important for us, and therefore we would love to hear any possible suggestions you might have for improving our UI/UX. Again, we thank you for finding the time to write this review. Best Regards, Omri ### 18. Practitest experience **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Elena T. | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Ability to manage all test cases in one place **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Not intuitive, need time to be familiar with a tool **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Manage test sets and cases in one place **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Elena, Thank you very much for your feedback. It is extremely important for us to hear our users feedbacks and try to improve the system accordingly. We were pleased to see you are having a good experience with PractiTest as an end to end test management tool. We would love to recieve any points you might have for improving the intuitivity of the system. Thanks again for finding the time to write this review, it means a lot for us. Best Regards, Omri ### 19. Nicely Organized testing tool **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** The Integration with Jira and the way the Tests Plans and Test Runs are organized. We have found setting up test plans easy and straight forward, we where up and running in no time at all **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** The User Management for Projects and roles is pretty bad and confusing. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Organizing our test plans and suites of tests. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear User, We thank you dearly for your review. We take our users feedbacks very seriously and they are crucial for us. We were pleased to see you enjoyed the experience of PractiTest integration with Jira as well as setting up your test plans. We are sorry for the bad experience you had with the project management roles. We would love to hear about the specific process you found confusing in order to review it. Thanks again for finding the time to write this review, we really appreciate it. Best Regards, Omri ### 20. Very agile and intuitive **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 21, 2018 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** The way i can easily design my test sets. Costumer service is always on -call and very helpful. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Assigning tests to different sets can be a bit more friendly **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** running multiple sets of manual and automated tests **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear User, We thank you very much for your feedback. It is very important for us to hear feedbacks from our users as it help us understand what we need to improve in the system. We were happy to hear that you found the usage of test sets easy and our customer support helpful. We would be happy to hear specifics regarding the difficulty you experienced with the assignments of tests to different test set and any suggestions you might have regarding. Again, thanks a lot for taking the time to write this review, we appreciate it. Best Regards, Omri ### 21. Great tool for the test management **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Amy P. | QA Engineer, Research, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 21, 2016 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** * Intuitive and easy to use (you will find it very user-friendly and no installation are required from your side) * Traceability between all modules (it is very important always to see linkage between entities) * Advanced REST API that allow to develop integrations with various platforms * Great integration solutions with bug tracking tools as JIRA, Pivotal Tracker, Bugzilla and many others * Customizable fields and filters * Reporting and Dashboards (we can generate metrics that display various characteristics of our manual and automated testing ) * Webinars, conferences and other activities PractiTest provides to customers where you can always learn something new and useful that can improve your testing skills **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** In general this product meets all the needs we currently have, but in addition would be great to have ability to sort exported data and rich formatting for more fields. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** According to my experience can say that PractiTest can become a good match for a middle-sized company looking for a tool that can help to organize and control testing process. Do not hesitate to contact their support if you have any questions, they are always available. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** PractiTest gives a great opportunity to control our entire testing process properly. Nowadays we can not realize our work without PractiTest as our main test management tool. The main benefit we realized is ability to manage our manual and automated testing together by using one tool only. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Hello Amy, Thank you very much for your lovely review. We really appreciate users' feedbacks as we are making improvements on the system based on requests we get. We were genuinely pleased to hear of the good experience you have with PracitTest for managing and controlling your testing process. We will be very happy to hear specific points for improvements in sorting exported data and rich formatting. Thanks again for taking the time to write this review! Kind Regards, Omri ### 22. PractiTest (user experience) **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Pascal M. | QA Tester, Computer & Network Security, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 04, 2016 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Reports and dashboards are very customizable so we can create metrics that reflect our data exactly per our request. Ability to integrate PractiTest with JIRA, automation tools (Selenium for example) and even Slack allows to manage the testing process more efficiently and properly. Filters that incorporated to the Filter tree give us the great opportunity to organize our tests, test sets and issues according to our needs, hence we always can find the relevant test, issue and so forth. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** I would recommend to add the option to copy and paste tests and ability of batch editing tags as well. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** My recommendations are very straightforward: You are looking for a good test management tool, check PractiTest. Use their live chat on the website in order to get answers you can't find regarding their product (as I did). Their reps are very friendly and work 24/7 if I'm not mistaken **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** PractiTest changes the vision of performing testing process. I know that always acquaintance of another tool, platform is painful thing to do, but when I start using PractiTest I realized that it is not painful at all, and I got many useful things I had no previously. Now we can say we manage our testing process properly thanks to PractiTest as product, but in addition to that we attend each webinar they provide as we learn new things not only related to PractiTest tool but related to the whole Quality Assurance industry **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Pascal, Thank you for your review. Feedbacks are crucial for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system based on our users' requests. We were pleased to know you are having a good experience with our reporting and dashboards options as well as our integration options and smart filters. We added the option for batch editing tags, and we have an option for cloning tests. In addition, we have a feature called "call to test" that allows you to call steps from another test. If you have any questions regarding these options or any other suggestion for improvement. Again we want to thank you for taking your time and writing this wonderful review, we highly appreciate it. Kind Regards, Omri ### 23. PractiTest review **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Inga R. | QA Tester, Computer Software, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 14, 2016 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Features I like most in PractiTest: * Integration with JIRA * GUI - user-friendly * Requirements, tests and issues are linked (they call it as traceability in the system) * Filters and folders (very easy to organize data using them) * Reporting (we use Dashboards and Reports that display the data properly per our requests) * Training (obviously we don't know all things PractiTest has, that's why we contact our PractiTest manager and she always helps us, provides us with online sessions, where we learn new things) **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Things I don't like in PractiTest: * Workflow can be improved in my opinion * Missing ability to copy-paste steps **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** My recommendation will be simple: Use PractiTest if you want to have the good test management tool for your QA Team. It doesn't matter you have integrations with other tools or not. PractiTest can work independently or can be integrated with the tool you have already been using. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Initially we had JIRA platform for our R&D Team and we felt that we need a separate test management tool. Due to the company's structure the approval process regarding tool's purchase took some time. Our researchers compared various tools (nowadays we have a lot on the market) and eventually made a conclusion to buy PractiTest thanks to its parameters. We can say a lot of manual testing became simpler and more efficiently in our company. We as the company's QA team can properly execute and control the test management process in the constantly volatile circumstances. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Inga, Thank you for your review. It is important for us to receive feedbacks from system users as we are constantly improving the system based on them. We were very pleased to hear you are enjoying the different options and capabilities of the system. Also, it was good to hear you had a good experience with the training sessions. We are reviewing the option of adding the ability to copy-past steps. We will be very happy to hear specifics on the improvements you think necessary for the workflow. Again, thank you so much for taking your time and writing this review. Best Regards, Omri ### 24. The Filters tree make our lives easier and saves us tons of time **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Philip R. | Software QA Tester, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 06, 2016 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** We have been using PractiTest for many years, so we can say this product always meets our needs taking into account the fact that our developers and testers are actively working on this tool together. There are many useful features PractiTest offers, I will mention the best ones in my opinion. At first we used folders in order to organize our data, but PractiTest's success manager suggested we use their Filters tree system. I can honestly say that, it was this transition that changed our work forever. Creating various filters and organizing the data in Filters trees suddenly just made sense. We were able to find tests and save time on "digging" for information. Second, since we use Jira, it was great to find how smooth the integration works with PractiTest. We always have all data from PractiTest linked with Jira and vice versa. Third, PractiTest gives us the licensing flexibility that allows us to adjust the number of users and license type on a daily basis, since this is every in flux, from project to project. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** That's difficult to choose something we dislike in this product. Maybe the one thing I wanted to recommend is to add more modern features to PractiTest. Although I know from experience that they take customer feedback into consideration an translate it into product improvements given the time. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** I recommend PractiTest to the companies that deal with manual testing. There are many features you can find in PractiTest whether you work with PractiTest only or you have integration with Jira, Redmine, Jenkins or other additional tools. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** We use PractiTest for all software testing in our company. Thus we need to know that the entire testing process is going smoothly and we admit that PractiTest gives us this opportunity. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Philip, Thank you very much for your review and your kind words. Feedbacks are very important for us as we constantly trying to improve our system based on customer feedback (as you mentioned). We were pleased to hear you are enjoying the filter tree system for data organization. Also, we were happy to see you are enjoying the capabilities of the integration between PractiTest and Jira. Again, thank you so much for taking your time to write this terrific review, we highly appreciate it. Best Regards, Omri ### 25. PractiTest - The good test management tool **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Monica K. | Tester, Computer Software, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 29, 2016 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** I can point out the following things I like most in PractiTest: 1. Jira integration that allows us as testers work properly and collaborate with developers as well. In a nutshell all teams work together efficiently achieving mutual goals. 2. Very intuitive GUI, it is very easy to work using the tool. 3. Reporting is very customized, so we can get live reports displaying everything we want to see. 4. Support assistance is always fast and of the great quality. 5. We have found Issue Management in-built PractiTest module as definitely good module we can use combining with features we have in Jira. 6. Many projects can be executed simultaneously and different test cases can be executed from them. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Sometimes we are used to do some things differently from what PractiTest suggest but it is only the thing is related to habit. Besides that I can say there are no other disadvantages I found in this tool **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** If you are looking for the good test management tool you must choose PractiTest. It makes testers' life easier! Live demo sessions are very helpful, so don't miss them it can significantly improve your work and understanding of this tool. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Software testing. During my work I test backend and frontend processes. As a tester I always need to be aware of current status of tests, history of runs, bugs, their connection and so on. Using PractiTest is very helpful to have the correct picture always and in the real time. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Monica, Thank you very much for your review. We take feedbacks very seriously as they perform as a base for future improvements we make in the system. We were very pleased to hear you are enjoying the different features and options PractiTest offers. Again, thank you for taking your time to write this review, we really appreciate it. Best Regards, Omri ### 26. Very useful and easy to use! **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** David B. | Software Tester, Computer & Network Security, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 23, 2016 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** First of all I am really enjoyed to organize our company's complicated sprints using the filters tree. This feature allows me as a tester to find relevant information having the big amount of data. The second thing I really like is the traceability that PractiTest provides with its clients. I'm always sure that all requirements, tests and issues are linked. The last but not the least thing I want to point out is the great Support I get every time I contact PractiTest. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Meanwhile I can't find any serious problems working with this testing tool. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Use all options PractiTest offers, as sometimes we just forget about all abilities this product offers. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** For our company PractiTest is the main test case management tool. I test both backend and frontend processes. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear David, Thank you very much for your review and your kind words, we really appreciate it. We were pleased to hear you are enjoying our hierarchical filter trees as well as the traceability options. Please let us know if you have any points for improvements. Best Regards, Omri ### 27. Practitest falls short of meeting the needs of a large company **Rating:** 1.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 15, 2015 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** Web-based, so your test cases are not tied to a specific network. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Search feature returns are head-scratching--searching for specific test cases rarely return anything useful. Filters and Folders structures are convoluted and archaic--ultimately these become catch-all areas and become useless over time. Mass editing is severely handicapped by inability to fully edit testcases. Adding testcases on the fly to testsets leads to another form of the filters and folders structure which is even more severely handicapped because you have to know exactly where to find the testcases you want to add. Does not allow users to tie in to Rally or other project management systems besides Jira. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Practitest is a fair starting place for small businesses with a small QA department. In its present inception, it will not meet the needs of larger departments with more employees and a need for better test case/test set administration. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** This question does not make sense to me. Practitest is creating more problems for us than solving by requiring too much time in testcase administration than in testing. The only real benefits we've found are the cost of using practitest is low and the accessibility via the web is convenient. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Hello, First of all, thank you for your review. It is extremely important for us to hear feedbacks from our users and improve our system accordingly. We were sorry to hear of the bad experiences you had with our filters and folders structure as well as with our advanced search option. We would be happy to hear specific details regarding the system improvements that you think are necessary. We apologize for our late comment on your review and would be happy to have a web session in which you can present points for improvement. Best Regards, Omri ### 28. Amazing **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Asfar R. | QA Analyst, Financial Services, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 13, 2015 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** User Friendly, Test Cases can be created here, Filing Issues, Search Filter, Sprint Management and manuy more **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** I just used this tool for 6 months I didn't find anything wrong in there. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Can be used in any company following an Agile Methadology. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** Documentation is the key role in any business process or SDLC/STLC and I think for IT guys specially for BA, Developers and QA's this tool is very beneficial so they can easily understand the issue and the acceptance criteria. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Hello Asfar, Thank you so much for taking the time to write this review and for your kind words, it means a lot for us to hear you are enjoying PractiTest. Kind Regards, Omri ### 29. Worked on Practitest while on Co-op **Rating:** 2.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Vishesh K. | Software Engineer 2 - Analytical Software Engineering, Computer Software, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 08, 2015 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** I really liked the customer support at Practitest, guys were really responsive and while their API was missing some features and after requesting it they were happy to develop them. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** It was a relatively new product with less functionality nothing revolutionary to offer. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** contacting practitest support has really helped me. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** I was implementing a dashboard application to monitor test results and other information. I really like that they had a sufficient information on their documentation to get an understanding of their API. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Hello Vishesh, Thanks a lot for you review, we apologize for not commenting on it earlier. Users feedbacks are important for us and we take them very seriously. Thank you for your kind words on our customer support, it means a lot and we are happy that you found our support useful as well as our API documentation. Over the years, we added many new features and functionality to our system based on customers requests. We would love to hear any suggestions you might have regarding missing functionality. Thanks again for taking the time to write this review. Best Regards, Omri ### 30. Simple but somewhat useful **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Biotechnology | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 05, 2015 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** it does make organizing test sets and cases much more simple, so for smaller projects this may be the go to for test case/set management, but as the project grows i think using test rails or even enterprise tester might be more effective. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** it doesnt offer users too many variations of reports, which makes managing test teams slightly less effective **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** this works for small projects. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** i used the web app mainly for keeping track of all test cases, and incidents found on each run I was having a small issue of not knowing what test cases were being run, and updated. This app solves this very well, with a ui that doesnt hurt the eyes **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear User, Thank you very much for your review, we apologize for not finding the time to comment on it earlier. It is extremely important for us to get our users feedbacks as we are constantly trying to improve our system based on them. We were happy to hear you enjoyed the experience with our UI. We were, on the other hand, sorry to hear that you didn't find are report options sufficient. Over the years we have made significant improvements in our reporting options. With that said, we would love to hear about any report option or any other suggestion you might have for improving our system. Again, thanks a lot for taking the time to write your review. Best Regards, Omri ### 31. It did what it was needed, not fancy but it worked. **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Pharmaceuticals | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 05, 2015 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** The filtering for activities like generating smoke tests was nice. The flow of "Steps to reproduce" -> expected -> actual results was also nice. The easy to see matrix - pass v fail, etc was also appealing. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** The organizational structures for testing was a pain. Really didn't like that. The help... needed help. This should be fall-down easy. **Recommendations to others considering PractiTest:** Make the help easier. The organization of the tests was a pain in the pants. Make things more flexible. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** This was the test case management platform for the company. This beat QTP hands down, but that isn't too difficult. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear User, We thank you for your review and apologize that we could not find the time to comment on it earlier. Feedbacks are very important for us as we try to improve the system based on our customers experiences with it. We were pleased to see that you liked our filtering system as well as the test step flow and the matrix options. We were sorry to hear of the bad experiences you had with the organizational structure of the testing process. We have made some changes over the years in order to improve it. With that said, we would be very happy to hear any suggestions you might have for further improvements. Thanks again for taking the time to write your feedback. Best Regards, Omri ### 32. Clear display **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Frédéric C. | Développeur web, Internet, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 15, 2015 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** The clearness of the display and user interface when the tests were set. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Entry of tests was a little cumbersome (but I am really not sure! Been a long time) **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** During that time, I was making tests for a Internet ad stats compiler solution. I was testing both backend and frontend processes. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear Frederic, We thank you very much for taking the time to write this review, we apologize for not finding the time to comment on it earlier. Feedbacks from our users means a great deal for us as we are constantly trying to improve the system. We are happy to see that you are having a good experience with our UI. We would love to hear any suggestions you might have of improving the process of entering tests to the system. Again, thanks a lot for your feedback. Best Regards, Omri ### 33. practiTest Review **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Marketing and Advertising | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 14, 2015 **What do you like best about PractiTest?** PractiTest providing links between ANY categories(test libraries, requirements, test sets, etc...). This helps a lot in keeping track of everything. **What do you dislike about PractiTest?** Complexity of the software. Learning the tool is a not easy. Even after a while of using the software, sometimes I still need to check out the manual. **What problems is PractiTest solving and how is that benefiting you?** I am a quality assurance analyst. The problems I have dealt with so fat were all technical, nothing related to business. **Official Response from Omri Berkovitch:** > Dear User, We thank you dearly for your review and apologize for not finding the time to comment on it earlier. Feedbacks on our product are extremely important for us, as we try to improve the system based on the feedbacks we get. We were very happy to see that you found the traceability between our modules effective. Regarding the complexity of the software, we are trying to offer as many useful features as we can, and still keep the ease of use. If you have any recommendations for us that would help us make our tool easier to use we would love to hear them. In addition, if you want, we can schedule a short web session in which we can review the best practices for using the system and hear you suggestions. Thanks again for you feedback. Best Regards, Omri ## PractiTest Discussions - [How do I plan to create filters so that I can reuse them again and again?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-do-i-plan-to-create-filters-so-that-i-can-reuse-them-again-and-again) - 1 comment, 1 upvote - [View PractiTest pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/practitest/reviews?page=5§ion=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-07-14+09%3A03%3A09+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=00dcb008-ef4b-4140-8474-60fa38b1bd7e&secure%5Btoken%5D=a085c8ee50b336aa458332943e99f8b72e25a392ad49ba1f45b1f9e195184a27&format=llm_user) ## PractiTest Integrations - [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) - [Azure Pipelines](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-pipelines/reviews) - [Bamboo](https://www.g2.com/products/bamboo-metrix-bamboo/reviews) - [Bugzilla](https://www.g2.com/products/bugzilla/reviews) - [ClickUp](https://www.g2.com/products/clickup/reviews) - [Cucumber](https://www.g2.com/products/cucumber/reviews) - [Cypress](https://www.g2.com/products/cypress-hcm-cypress/reviews) - [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews) - [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) - [Jenkins](https://www.g2.com/products/jenkins/reviews) - [Jira](https://www.g2.com/products/jira/reviews) - [Playwright](https://www.g2.com/products/playwright/reviews) - [Selenium](https://www.g2.com/products/selenium/reviews) - [Slack](https://www.g2.com/products/slack/reviews) ## PractiTest Features **Functionality** - Test Repository - Integration - Test Diversity **Agentic AI - Software Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance **Management** - Reporting - Version Control - Scaling ## Top PractiTest Alternatives - [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/products/testrail/reviews) - 4.4/5.0 (592 reviews) - [Qase](https://www.g2.com/products/qase/reviews) - 4.7/5.0 (305 reviews) - [Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-qtest/reviews) - 4.3/5.0 (103 reviews)