# Which IT asset management platforms are highest-rated for IT teams managing hundreds of endpoints based on user reviews?

Looking for input from G2 reviewers and IT managers, infrastructure leads, and MSP engineers in the IT Asset Management category, specifically from teams managing 200 to 2,000 endpoints simultaneously, where the asset management challenge is less about initial discovery and more about maintaining accurate and current data.

The platforms with the strongest evidence for managing hundreds of endpoints reliably:

NinjaOne: Managing large endpoint counts without a proportional increase in IT team headcount is the most consistently documented outcome. MSP engineers credit NinjaOne for enabling them to manage hundreds of client devices efficiently and thoroughly across multiple organisations from a single console without requiring separate logins, tools, or processes for each client.
Lansweeper: Continuous, automatic discovery across all network-connected devices without manual scan initiation is described as the endpoint count scaling capability that allows IT teams to maintain an accurate inventory of hundreds of endpoints without dedicating staff time to keeping the inventory current.
ManageEngine Asset Explorer: The auto-detection capability for most asset types combined with flexible categorisation and bulk update features is described as the configuration efficiency that makes managing large asset counts practical without individual record-by-record updates.
Freshservice: The ITSM-integrated asset management model, where every endpoint appears in both the asset inventory and the service desk as a linked record, gives IT teams managing hundreds of endpoints a complete view of each device's incident history, change history, and current configuration state alongside the hardware and software inventory.
Rippling IT: The connection between HR-driven onboarding and IT asset management, where a new employee hire in the HR system automatically triggers device provisioning and software access in the IT system, is described as the endpoint count scaling capability for organisations where the number of endpoints grows proportionally with headcount.

For IT managers who have transitioned from spreadsheet-based asset tracking to a dedicated platform for a fleet of 200 or more endpoints: how long did the initial discovery and population of the asset database take, and what percentage of the discovered assets contained information that was missing or incorrect in the previous spreadsheet inventory?

##### Post Metadata - Posted at: 3 days ago - Author title: Marketing Executive - Net upvotes: 1 ## Comments ### Comment 1 Initial discovery is only the first test. I’d compare inventory accuracy again three or six months later, after devices have been reassigned, replaced, taken offline, and had software changed. At hundreds of endpoints, the real scaling problem is whether the asset database stays trustworthy automatically or gradually turns into another inventory someone has to reconcile manually. ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 3 days ago - Author title: Writer ## Related discussions - [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 6 - [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 0 - [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 4