It’s easy to use, and the flexibility of the tagging and filtering options is very convenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be great to have a way to mass edit and maintain filters. For example, in the Project Settings --> Filters tab, it would be helpful if you could filter or group the filter names, then use checkboxes to select multiple filters to delete or edit in one action. That kind of bulk management would make ongoing maintenance much more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User-friendliness, operation is simple, and the overviews of test cases, sets, etc. are somewhat easy to learn. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Partly, linked sets with JIRA are difficult to find. Also, the assignment of who has assigned a test when the test set is assigned to someone else. Partly difficult to see that quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I appreciate most about PractiTest is how effectively it centralizes and organizes the entire QA process. The interface is both clean and intuitive, which makes managing test cases, test sets, requirements, and bugs straightforward and efficient. I find the filtering, dashboards, and reporting features particularly powerful—they make it simple to monitor progress, coverage, and quality metrics in real time.

Another significant benefit is its flexibility: PractiTest can be tailored to fit various workflows and projects without adding unnecessary complexity. The integrations with tools like Jira are seamless and help save considerable time in daily tasks. Overall, PractiTest enables our team to remain organized, aligned, and focused on maintaining high quality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the more advanced features have a learning curve and may not feel very intuitive at first. Although the tool is quite powerful, new users would benefit from some onboarding to get the most out of filters, dashboards, and custom fields. The user interface is generally well designed, but certain actions require more clicks than expected, especially when working with traceability between modules.

Integration with Jira and customization improve with experience and can also depend on the specific CI/CD automation tools being used. Additionally, a lightweight version of PractiTest would be beneficial for small, agile projects where teams spend less time on test management.

At times, performance can lag, especially when generating reports. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of use, multi-project support, custom fields, Jira integration and the direction of AI enhanced features Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Milestones is a solid concept, but it takes a lot of manual effort to keep it up to date with deliveries and sprints. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Right from POC to onboarding, it is great experience using PractiTest. We've been using PractiTest for our QA processes, and it has streamlined our test management and reporting capabilities.

Intuitive UI: The interface is clean and user-friendly, with well-organized customizable dashboards and fields that make onboarding fast and efficient.

Customization & Filters: The flexible filtering system is a standout feature. It allows us to slice and dice data to focus on what's most important — whether by project, module, or team.

Integration Capabilities: It integrates well with tools like JIRA, Jenkins, and automation frameworks.

Support : Their customer support is responsive and knowledgeable, and the product documentation is thorough and regularly updated.

PractiTest is a robust and flexible test management solution that caters well to agile and enterprise QA teams. If you're looking for strong traceability, great integration options, and a highly customizable QA process — this tool is worth considering. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, it is fulfilling all our team's needs, so no dislikes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about PractiTest is its clear visibility across the entire testing process. It keeps everything organized and easy to manage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about PractiTest is the initial learning curve. While the platform is powerful, some menus and configurations aren’t immediately intuitive for new users, so it takes a bit of time to get fully comfortable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have been using PractiTest since the beginning of my carpentry career. Implementation is user friendly. Now I am using it every day. I can't imagine it without it anymore. It makes it incredibly easy to link all business requirements with individual scenarios (test cases) and it is very good at allowing their clear execution afterwards. Colleagues who have been using ordinary excel spreadsheets for this work for a long time are amazed at the possibilities PractiTest allows. From cloning, to parameters in test cases, to a new custom AI for creating test cases, to creating a test suite directly from a requirement, to the ability to link to requirements in a clear way, to cloning to another project. Very useful is also integration with Jira, which helps us to link direct test cases and their instances from execution directly on tickets. Customer service always helps us with issues if they occur.

Good - filters in dashboards Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Really only a few things, for example cloning to another project does not also copy the templates that are used in the test time and one has to manually clone that template to another project as well and then manually re-step as in the original project. Also, sometimes filters do not behave properly and after redirecting they point to a different page (filter) than the desired one. Info about linking of requirements and test cases in history tab would be useful for us, because sometimes links change or disappear and we do not know who did it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how PractiTest keeps all test cases, defects, and reports organized in one place, making tracking easy and hassle-free. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the interface feels a bit slow, and customizing reports can be confusing for new users. Importing of Bulk test cases from the file is bit difficult process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is great test management tool, it syncs well with JIRA and other integrations. It also has faster support system in case of any issue. Easy to learn for new employeers.

Very fast customer service and a great chatbot Fin to help with identifing Practitest features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI can be improved little better as I really find hard sometimes to adjust to the new UI changes and I would stick to the older ones. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’m consistently impressed by the simplicity and integration capabilities of PractiTest, and I truly appreciate the R&D team’s responsiveness and timely feedback on suggestions; it significantly enhances our experience. I also value the seamless integration with other automation tools and the clear, user-friendly documentation, which makes implementation straightforward and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be fantastic if we could write and run automated scripts directly within the portal, with built-in monitoring, eliminating the need for additional plugins like Jenkins. This capability would streamline our process and make automation even more accessible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.