OpenText ALM Quality Center is very helpful in managing testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
OpenText ALM Quality Center's setup is complicated. Need to increase user-friendliness. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is very helpful in managing testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
OpenText ALM Quality Center's setup is complicated. Need to increase user-friendliness. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is easy to use. has many features and integrates well with Microfocus UFT. The User Roles and Security works as expected making it sensible to use along with Microfocus UFT to create test scripts and execute it by users using ALM license only Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing to dislike; however, some features required to customize the Report of Test Results could have been integrated. We had to use other tools to do the same, and it needed some more efforts Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Easy to work with and seamless data transfer from UFT to ALM and SQL. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Sometimes I get a server licensing error while trying to log in. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Our team liked this tool because of the below cool features:
-> Helps to manage project requirements, test plan, test cases and test report
-> Test Cycle can be created and assigned for project-wise/module wise
-> Awesome template for bug ticket and it have fields for assignee, status field, priority, severity description, attachment section etc which helps QA to raise Bug with Details
-> Awesome report and email analytics
-> Easily integrable with HP UFT, Load Runner and other tools
-> Test Summary and Test report automatically generated
-> Highly recommended for Testing teams and Agile Projects Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Tools should be free for small business or limited users. Currently its paid and trial version is only for very limited days. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Generating Reports, Tracking Defects, and Test Execution Process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
UI is lacking. It is only available on Internet Explorer. Chrome/Firefox would be a better pick. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Ability to generate and download Excel based report Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Sometimes difficult to navigate around the tool Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Tracking of test cases during SIT and UAT. Also defect management is best Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There is no feature to capture screen which is integrated with SAP Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It has similarities and differences with HP ALM QC in a good way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Micro Focus ALM QC is not the most user friendly interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's user friendly test management tool. It has various section for requirements, defects, test labs to execute test cases and test plan to keep test cases. We can add test cycles very efficiently and can add related test cases for execution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
As it is only a test management tool, we have to go to a project management tool for other project related works. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Setting and managing test cases and test labs are very easy in ALM, you can store results for manual and automated test runs effectively for any release. We can also optimize ALM as per our need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have been using it for more than 3 years, nothing as such to dislike but a few improvements are possible like the integration of ALM with the latest test automated tools should be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
Averages based on real user reviews.
4 months
20 months