I appreciate that OpenEvidence presents information drawn from reputable medical journals, and that it presents the strength of the cited evidence within the references section. It is easy to filter by type or date of evidence within your prompt. Answers are presented in plan English, with graphics as appropriate, which makes them easy to incorporate as part of my workflow even during busy periods. The user interface is straightforward, intuitive, and easily lets me organize my queries by either topic, patient, or visit history. The addition of a customizable AI scribe is invaluable and places OpenEvidence at the top of its category. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Community feature feels underdeveloped, in part because it is a newer feature. The social networking aspects of the program could be expanded to increase opportunities for professional connections (i.e., similar to LinkedIn). OpenEvidence also lags slightly behind its competitors in consistency of information- there have been times that I've posed the same query twice and received differing information. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to use during a patient evaluation. Helps to fill in potential blind spots and differential diagnoses. Saves time writing notes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the information can be a bit overthinking for the situation, but it gives me plenty of "what if" to consider for the patient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how it is specialized for medicine inquiries. It is like an gpt optimized for medicine. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would hope that it would be better advertised and put in public. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.