cubeCDMS Reviews & Product Details

Provides a variety of features, allows for different privileges per role, and EDC setup is not that difficult.

In particular, there are various ECS settings, so there is not much manual query.

If you are not sure how to set it up, you can use ChatGPT to find it or in the online manual, and if you have any difficulties, you can ask for help to get a quick response and resolve it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As various functions are developed and provided, they become more complex and do not know all of them, so I often look up a lot of online manuals, but they are not well understood due to the lack of specific examples. I would like it if you could supplement specific setup methods and examples in the online manual. And it is difficult to find the desired functions and setup methods because they are divided into regular update in the online manual. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the user-friendly interface, which makes it easy to input and manage clinical data efficiently. The system’s structure is intuitive, allowing smooth navigation even for first-time users. I also find the real-time data visibility and logical layout very useful for tracking study progress and ensuring data integrity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the system can be a bit slow when loading or saving large datasets, which affects workflow efficiency. Additionally, some functions require multiple steps to complete simple tasks, which could be optimized to reduce repetitive work. It would also be helpful to have more customizable reporting features to fit different study needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI is intuitive and easy to use. It is also convenient that both the EDC system and the IWRS system can be accessed on a single page. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing I particularly dislike. However, in other systems, the visit date is displayed next to the visit number once the subject’s visit page has been entered. I think it would be more convenient if this feature were also applied to the cubeCDMS EDC system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I value cubeCDMS most for its configurability and intuitive UX. It adapts quickly to real-world changes—like protocol updates or site expansions—and its clear data flow across modules boosts cross‑team collaboration and efficiency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While cubeCDMS is strong overall, its rich configuration options make initial setup somewhat complex, and certain advanced customizations require admin privileges and detailed guidance. Additionally, integrating with external systems can take time, as teams need to align on API specifications upfront. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The intuitive layout facilitates easy verification of the EDC. As cubeCDMS is widely used in domestic research, its familiarity contributes to improved work efficiency. It is easy implementation to projects, and I use it daily for project management. Since the customer support is well-managed, problems can be addressed promptly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be beneficial if it could be integrated with various systems and used for comprehensive research management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Provide e-manual and training course for every topic.

2. "Bulider" with description for each function or setting item.

3. The user interface is intuitive and easy to navigate.

4. CRScube Help Center respond to issues efficiently and effectively.

5. The system supports multiple languages.

6.Based on customer expectations and feedback, the system functions are quickly adjusted and improved.

7. The function descriptions are clear when executing edit check logic bindings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Up to now，the system performs efficiently without any problems requiring improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the system very user-friendly and easy to navigate. It offers a wide range of features that meet the needs of our company's more complex design studies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since we just started using it, there’s really nothing I dislike so far. However, there are a few small improvements that could make it even more convenient, such as allowing items to be moved across different CRFs instead of having to delete them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In the case of Cube CDMS, it offers great flexibility in implementing various types of clinical trials. From Phase I trials to PMS for medical devices, I found that, compared to other CDMS solutions, there were no major limitations from a builder’s perspective in terms of implementation. In particular, during the process of analyzing raw data after the build, I noticed that the data were collected cleanly and without omissions, which I believe enhances the overall reliability of the data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Regarding the certification process for builders, I feel that the process is somewhat lengthy and may be a burden for practitioners. I think a more streamlined procedure, or one that allows for self-training, would be more reasonable.

As for Cube Safety, I understand that it is still in the process of being upgraded; however, it is a bit unfortunate that there are not enough training materials or proper user guides available. Of course, in the case of Safety, users tend to explore it through various test scenarios, but still, having more structured learning resources would be helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CubeCDMS is incredibly intuitive and easy to navigate, both for CRAs and for site staff. As a CRA, I can easily track query resolution, monitor data entry status, and ensure data quality in real time. The system’s interface is clean and well-organized, which helps minimize errors and saves valuable time. Most importantly, investigators and coordinators consistently tell me that it's the easiest EDC system they've ever used, which reduces their burden and encourages timely data entry. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the system works well overall, one area for improvement would be the handling of submitted SAE reports. Since configurations can vary between studies, it would be extremely helpful if CubeCDMS could provide a standardized view that clearly highlights what has changed in the SAE report compared to previous versions. Additionally, having the ability to extract this information as raw data would make safety review and documentation much more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the main advantages of using the CubeCDMS system is its intuitive and straightforward interface, which makes it visually appealing and easy to navigate. Data extraction is also convenient and efficient, which significantly improves workflow. Overall, the system design enhances both usability and productivity. Also, system downtime is significantly less frequent compared to other EDC systems. With around 7 years of experience as a CRA, I can confidently say that CRScube is the most satisfying system I’ve worked with. Site staff also consistently express a strong preference for the CRScube system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI is not fully optimized for mobile or tablet devices, which made it somewhat inconvenient when trying to check things quickly on-site. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.