I appreciate Loopio's simple user interface, which allows me to navigate easily and efficiently without encountering any complex or hidden buttons. This intuitive design significantly enhances my user experience by making the process straightforward. I also love the ability to store answers under different stacks, which is incredibly helpful for organizing content. This feature makes it easy to apply filters and find highly relevant answers quickly, streamlining my workflow for RFx requests. Additionally, I value the ease of Loopio's initial setup, which was remarkably simple and akin to a plug-and-play experience. We were provided with SSO login credentials, making the transition smooth and hassle-free. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am not satisfied with Loopio's Magic functionality. Despite the fact that there are relevant answers in the database, the Magic function often fails to deliver the right or even relevant answers to my questions. I've tried using it with different settings, but there is no noticeable difference in the quality of answers produced. While it offers responses to a number of questions, the accuracy and relevance remain problematic. Without the Magic function, my experience with Loopio is significantly better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Loopio really useful for streamlining the way we manage RFPs from a workflow perspective. It offers huge efficiencies in mapping questions, assigning owners, and makes dealing with RFPs so much smoother. The AI matching element that picks out relevant content from our library and matches it with the questions in an RFP is brilliant, saving us a lot of time. We've had really good feedback from the sales team; they enjoy using the platform as it makes it easier to track what's happening with their RFP. The comments, tagging, and review cycles features have been really beneficial. Additionally, Loopio is incredibly intuitive, and the resources they provide are really useful. The onboarding process was great, leaving us with a substantial understanding of the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's early stages for us, so at the moment we're just blown away with how good the platform is.I imagine it's going to be quite difficult managing the huge number of library entries that we'll have from the different business units, not just for RFPs, but other teams in the business will be using Loopio for their due diligence questionnaires, security questionnaires, etcetera. So I think it's going to be quite a complex task moving forward to manage it. But, certainly, far less complex than it would be without the platform! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

i like the fact that you can now search for an exact match or AI answer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The process of managing SMEs reviews and keeping information up to date is very manual. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loopio makes managing client security questionnaires super easy. The keyword search and stack filtering help me find the right answers quickly. The dashboard gives a clear picture of projects and tasks, and reassigning work within the team is simple. Features like Project Database and “Last Updated by” make tracking updates easy. Overall, it cuts down emails and boosts productivity — definitely way better than using Excel! 😄 Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reassigning requests to different LOBs in Loopio can be tricky, especially when some applications are outsourced and require manual exporting and emailing. If we could share directly or give external SMEs access, it would make the process much smoother and more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I believe Loopio genuinely assists bid managers and other professionals, such as Solution Architects and Sales teams, in enhancing their RFI and RFP responses. It helps save time and provides a reliable source of truth and standardization that you can trust. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I believe this is a great tool overall. However, one area that could be improved is the Word mapping feature, which does not function as effectively as it does in Excel. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loopio continues to expand upon its offerings, aiming to meet its clients' needs as they change over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be beneficial if exports were sorted by subcategory, etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loopio is a great tool to enhance the RFP process Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as such about the tool. I have been using for quite some time now Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Loopio to develop answers for technical portions of government proposal responses, and I like how it lets us save time by quickly accessing a library of curated content. The new AI features further reduce the time it takes to get answers, and I find it really helpful that Loopio indicates if content is AI-composed and provides citations. This is especially useful when asked where a bit of content came from. Importing the project outline, which breaks down the solicitation into required response sections, is another feature I appreciate. Although I wasn't part of the initial setup, I believe it was straightforward given that Loopio's support is good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the imports don't work. There was one project, neither my colleague nor I could get the solicitation (Excel sheet) to import. Kept getting an error message. On another project, I was reviewing the exported doc on the shared drive and there were several questions I couldn't find. I realized the import failed to include many questions from the solicitation. Good thing I double check my work because something like that could lead to a disqual. I ended up having to add them to the export manually, then add the answers to the Loopio library manually so we'd have them for the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate Loopio's ability to streamline the RFP response process by getting to the first draft faster, which allows me to spend more time customizing and winning responses. The new AI features are tremendously helpful, especially when I don't have existing library content, as it generates an active starting point that saves time under tight timelines. I also value the library freshness/confidence pulse feature, which ensures the accuracy of our data by flagging content that needs review, helping maintain our credibility, especially in education RFPs. These aspects make Loopio an invaluable tool in managing RFPs and reducing the manual workload associated with copying, pasting, and collaborating on proposal drafts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am frustrated that collaborators cannot comment or ask questions on specific sentences or paragraphs within a response entry. This limitation significantly slows down the collaboration process because if a collaborator needs to refer to a particular section but cannot pinpoint it easily, it causes delays. Additionally, I am looking forward to building out a go/no-go matrix within Loopio instead of using an external Excel sheet, as this functionality is currently not in place. Another issue I'm having is with the AI generated responses, while accurate, don't use customer-first language or some proposal best practices. I believe this is being included in an upcoming update, but haven't been able to test this yet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Loopio is fast and easy to use, making things simple for our team. The speed allows us to move on to other submissions quickly, helping us knock out more proposals at one time. It's also great that it integrates pretty heavily into our Google Suite without any issues in the initial setup. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would love if they would implement a dark mode. Because it's white, it can sometimes be a strain on the eyes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.