Lingo Pricing Overview

edit

Free Trial

Try for Free

Free Trial

Per Month

Our full business plan, free for 30-days.

Starter

Starting at $80.00

Per Month

The basics needed for your team.

Business

Starting at $160.00

Per Month

Enhanced tools for growing teams.

Enterprise

Per Year

Advance featured to scale your brand.

Lingo offers flexible pricing tailored to creative teams of all sizes. Choose from three plans:

-- Starter: $80/month plus $16 per editor, billed annually
-- Business: $160/month plus $24 per editor, billed annually
-- Enterprise: Custom pricing for larger organizations

Each plan includes a set number of consumers (view-only users), with options to add more as needed. Additional features like direct links and extra storage are available to scale with your team's growth. Lingo's pricing is designed to be transparent and adaptable, ensuring you only pay for what you use.

For a detailed breakdown and to calculate your specific costs, visit our pricing page at https://www.lingoapp.com/pricing.

Lingo has 4 pricing editions. Look at different pricing editions below and see what edition and features meet your budget and needs.

Pricing information for Lingo is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase Lingo must be conducted with the seller.

Get started today with a fully-featured 30-day free trial or schedule a demo with the Lingo team at lingoapp.com.

Pricing information was last updated on November 14, 2025

Top-Rated Alternatives

View All Alternatives

Lingo Alternatives Pricing

The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other Design Systems Software

Brandfolder Enterprise	Get a Free Quotehttps://brandfolder.com/quote	Brandfolder is the world’s most powerfully simple digital asset management platform for storing, sharing, and showcasing assets. Manage one brand or 50 from a single dashboard Define privacy and permission settings for your Brandfolder Visual Platform: A Single Source for Brand Assets Set Permissions: Grant Access As You See Fit One Link: Easily Share Your Brandfolder Image Editing: Access Multiple Sizes & Formats Embed: Instantly Update Assets Onsite Event Feed: Keep Tabs on Your Brand Show More
Bynder Enterprise	Contact Us	Centralize all digital assets, manage asset storage and support creative and marketing teams to collaborate more efficiently during the creative process. Centralised content repository Collaboration & asset workflow tools Content creation & automation tools Easy to use permission management and access Dedicated customer success manager Advanced user permissions Custom branding Agentic AI Omni-channel content distribution tools Detailed usage analytics Show More
Acquia DAM (Widen) Workgroup DAM	Free Trial50 Users Per Year	For departments and small businesses. Up to 50 users of any type. Assets Insights Portals Admin Native Integrations REST API Show More

Various alternatives pricing & plans

Free Trial

Pricing information for the above various Lingo alternatives is supplied by the respective software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase any of these products must be conducted with the seller.

Lingo Pricing Reviews

(1)

Caleb P.

1/27/2026

"Simplicity and Markdown Make Lingo a Standout"

5/5

What do you like best about Lingo?

I like the simplicity of the platform, and I personally love the Markdown support. Lingo is great for storing and keeping up with digital assets and brand guidelines for multiple brands. It allows us to support our wholesale customers by easily delivering media kits to them. It's also super easy to set up, especially since our brand kits weren't too complex before switching over. Lingo's pricing model worked better for us compared to other options. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Lingo?

I would love a more robust account-wide file manager, as well as some additional display options for files inside of kits (like a large-size preview of a file, for instance). It would also be nice if the 'supplemental media' elements could be managed as files rather than as single-instance uploads. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.