InterSystems Health Connect Reviews & Product Details

Very flexible. ETL and DTL is very easy. everything can be done like just drag and drop methods. Integrations are powerful. A very good Low code no code concept. For what the health connect provides as features??? It is worth it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Understanding ObjectScript isn’t something everyone has, especially when you need to write a small piece of custom code. The documentation is very good overall, but it can be a bit difficult to navigate and to find the right section when you need it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Because InterSystems Health Connect sits on top of InterSystems IRIS, it has access to the full suite of interoperability tools and the full performance of IRIS, which has been honed to scale horizontally and vertically. Integration, especially with health care data, is easy with Health Connect and its built in dictionaries, schemas, and tooling.

InterSystems is actively upgrading the user experience as well, replacing a dated Zen front end with a modern Angular UI. This will allow them to continue to refine their user interface in a modern technology with many additional tools available to them.

If you're an InterSystems customer, their best in class WRC will respond to any issue you have and provide support that, frankly, goes way beyond any other services I've used. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Health Connect doesn't allow you to program in ObjectScript and build classes, which I view as a key part of scalable interoperability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I've been impressed with InterSystems Health Connect with regards to the intuitiveness of UI/UX, while still maintaining an accessible back end and available customization. Health Connect allows for large scale interface integrations with a focus on performance and scalability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The price of Health Connect can be a large hurdle for smaller networks, though this is offset by great ROI when it comes to institutions requiring many integrations and scalability. It can be difficult at time to find the right support resources, but once you do, the support is fantastic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is very scalable, unlikely to ever face problems only due to increase in demand/usage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the programming language used to develop is a bit non-intuitive, compared with the Javascript used in the main rivals. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Health Connect is that it makes integration work smoothly, without the overcomplicated processes I’ve run into with other integration engines. It lets you connect multiple systems, handle different standards like FHIR and HL7, and control message flow in a structured way, without having to start from scratch. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Like with any product, the initial setup can feel a bit heavy, especially if you’re new to InterSystems products. Getting productions, routing, and transformations configured correctly takes some time and attention.

Once you move into high-volume environments, troubleshooting can become quite involved. The tools available are powerful, but it can take a while to learn where to look and how to narrow down issues efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main strength of the platform is its robustness. It handles large volumes of data and critical integrations very well, especially in scenarios with HL7 and legacy systems. The traceability of messages and the ability to monitor flows (Business Processes and Operations) greatly assist in support and in identifying issues in production. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vertical Technological Environment, making it impossible to create horizontally scalable integration services to increase the availability of APIs for large volumes of data Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about InterSystems Health Connect is its reliability and flexibility when handling complex healthcare integrations. Its powerful message transformation and routing capabilities make working with standards like HL7 and FHIR much more manageable. The ability to customize and extend integrations using its tooling is a big advantage. I appreciate the robust monitoring and debugging tools, which make it easier to quickly identify and resolve issues. The high performance and stability, especially when processing large volumes of messages in real time, are impressive. It allows us to onboard new systems and interfaces without significant rework, thanks to its scalability. Its centralized integration management simplifies what would otherwise be a very complex environment. Overall, it provides a dependable and efficient platform for managing healthcare integrations, significantly reducing operational overhead compared to more fragmented approaches. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While InterSystems Health Connect is a powerful and reliable platform, there are a few areas that could be improved. One challenge is the learning curve, especially for new users who are not familiar with its architecture or underlying technologies. Getting fully comfortable with development and configuration can take time. The user interface could also be more modern and intuitive. While it is functional, certain tasks—especially around navigation and configuration—can feel less streamlined compared to newer integration platforms. Additionally, documentation can sometimes be dense or fragmented, making it harder to quickly find specific implementation guidance. Debugging complex issues, while supported by good tools, can still require deep expertise in some cases. Initial setup and configuration can be resource-intensive depending on the environment. Overall, these are not deal-breakers, but improving usability, onboarding, and documentation would make the platform even more efficient and accessible, especially for new users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Standard DTL. The message trace is complete, and the global usage provides a lot of best practices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interface feels outdated, and the installation process is more complex than it should be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate InterSystems Health Connect's ability to convert data between different formats and ensure patient data is always accessible. I find its reliability and speed critical for maintaining efficient patient care. I also like the amazing customer support, and the initial setup was pretty straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the complexity of its interface could be made simpler. Sometimes it could be a challenge, especially when you don't have the personnel. We are short-staffed, so when the person in charge is not available, operations have to stall as they wait for the person who knows the system well. If it could be made in a language that could be understood by a regular employee it could be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love InterSystems Health Connect for its effective ability to connect different systems easily and efficiently, especially in environments that require continuous data exchange. It is characterized by its high stability and ability to handle large amounts of data without issues, and it supports standards such as HL7 and FHIR, making integration seamless and flexible. Additionally, it provides a good balance between strong performance and flexibility in implementing integration processes, and it has a good capability to monitor data flow effectively, which facilitates maintenance and technical support. Moreover, the system has good flexibility in building and modifying integration processes according to business needs and is considered reliable in complex work environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the aspects I see that can be improved in InterSystems Health Connect is ease of use, as the interface may be relatively complex for new users and requires time to get accustomed to. Additionally, the initial setup and configuration process can be lengthy and requires good technical expertise, especially in large environments or when implementing complex integrations. Furthermore, the documentation could be clearer and include more practical examples to facilitate understanding and application. Sometimes, also, some customization processes require additional steps or more time, which may affect the speed of execution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.