I find Make really helpful for automating a lot of things, especially with API integrations, which makes the process very easy. I appreciate being able to track errors in integrations easily, which is a big help. What I like most is the ability to integrate so many different apps, as Make acts as a middleware, allowing me to connect any kind of app. It's been especially beneficial for client projects, like integrating the appointment system with Go High Level. Make serves as a vital bridge, synchronizing data smoothly, which saves me a lot of time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I get so many errors sometimes, and I always have to use a lot of AI tools to figure out what's wrong. Compared to Zapier, Make is a little difficult to use, and we suddenly get an error that stops the entire scenario. That's the biggest issue with Make.com. If they can fix it, it would be great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can automate a lot of my daily work such as my finances, creating proposals, research. I like that Make.com is very easy to use and I can configure many different automations and AI Agent at an affordable price. When I face issues I can email Make.com and they reply fast and the AI capabilities is very extensive. Overall, I would highly recommend especially with the number of integrations it can connect to and it performs very well for both personal and business use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel Make.com has a lot of new updates which takes time to learn and I prefer the old AI Agent builder system rather than the new one Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Make is simple to build and easy to duplicate. Its run history makes it clear what succeeded, and it connects Gemini and Google Drive without me having to write a server. I can run recordings in parallel and finish a 20-minute lesson in under an hour, while I work on the visuals. The initial setup was simple, too. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Big batches sometimes hit a Google Drive upload timeout and I lose a few files. I also ran through my monthly operations much faster than expected once production picked up. Clearer warnings before my account pauses would help. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Make offers a very cheap alternative to expensive AI tool calls while still achieving my goals, and its deterministic nature is a plus. The scenarios feature is the best part, allowing me to create pathways for tasks like research, writing, reading, updating, and sending emails without manual effort, which saves me a lot of time and money. The initial setup of Make was pretty easy, and although there was a learning curve, the Make academy and resources are great for learning and adapting to the system. Plus, it's highly integrated with Claude. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think it would be really helpful if there was a warning when my subscription plan usage is running higher than the daily average before credits reset. Maybe highlighting it with red text if I'm using too many credits so I don't run out before the monthly reset would be nice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Make as the central automation layer for my business, and I really appreciate how it connects all my AI tools with Google and other SaaS applications. It eliminates repetitive manual work and helps me build reliable AI workflows without writing custom code, saving me hours every week. I love its visual scenario builder, which allows me to see the whole flow at a glance, making building and debugging fast. The extensive app library and MCP integration with Claude are big pluses as well. I value the routers and filters for branching logic, as well as the data store and execution history for debugging purposes. The AI modules and MCP server are key, allowing my AI assistant to run scenarios directly. The initial setup was easy for me, not complicated at all. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Credit-based pricing can be hard to predict for heavier workflows, and some error messages are vague. Large scenarios also get cluttered on the canvas, so better ways to organize and document them would help. A cost estimate per scenario before running it, and alerts when usage spikes, would help. For errors, I would like clearer messages that point to the exact field that failed. Better search and filtering in execution history and data stores would also save a lot of time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Make is the most useful and amazing "tool" I use for automation. It’s so easy to use! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing to report overall, except maybe one thing: I subscribed to a paid package because I thought I would get the 100'000 credits offer, but I only received 8,333 per month for 12 months. Sorry, but that wasn’t obvious to me at the time. If I had understood that, I would have subscribed to a higher package instead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the easy operation and the connection with numerous other tools. With Make, I can implement things that interns used to do faster and without training. The processes run flawlessly, and Make is never "sick." The setup is much easier today than it was two to three years ago. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In the beginning, the setup was difficult 2–3 years ago, even though it is much easier now. I wish for an AI function that understands well what I want to automate and creates the complete workflow for me when I describe what I need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s easy to use, and it’s straightforward to set up automations and workflows. I also like how it integrates with various tools such as Microsoft 365, Claude, and WordPress. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s a bit of a learning curve at first, like with any new tool, but the UI/UX is really nice and it’s much easier to pick up than Zapier or other alternatives. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UX and UI allow for easy handling. Integration with external tools is very important and constantly expanding. Performance is good without being incredible. Unfortunately, the pricing system will push me to develop locally on n8n as soon as possible. I have never called on support. AI is not yet up to par. It would be simpler to integrate ChatGPT as is the case with Claude. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is a lack of a test environment to build different scenarios without costs related to make or other tools. Indeed, my biggest expense is not during the startup, whether it is occasional or regular, but during the construction phase. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love how easy it is to automate tasks, the interface is easy to understand. Variety of connections. It did not crash on me at all. Pricing is reasonable and the support staff was very helpful. I have not tried the ai part but will try soon. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I honestly do not have anything to dislike about make. I have been using make for almost 2 years now and it has always been satisfactory. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.