
Not much. It is mostly an AI driven system and hence does not check consistently the exam environment as a human proctor will do.
Only good thing that can be said about it is that it is easy to set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The room scan is especially faulty. It will lauch the exam even if the student does not do a room scan or scan the desk area. It also does not say definitely if a student is using a second devise etc but notes "student may have used". All this makes proctoring nearly useless and pushes a lot of proctoring stuff to faculty. It takes hours and hours of instructor time to go through the videos to decide on a student grade. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Thank you for sharing this feedback. We are working directly with your team to better understand these concerns and help improve your experience.
Honorlock is highly configurable, and many of the items mentioned here, including room scan requirements and which events are sent for review, can depend on an institution’s selected settings and workflows.
We also want to call out a couple of recent changes: Room Scan is being replaced by a new Workspace Scan, which gives a more consistent environment check before exam entry. This is a feature that can also be enabled by your institution. We also verify side-camera placement upfront so positioning gets resolved before the exam starts rather than during review.
We’re working with your school’s Honorlock administrator to review the current setup, discuss available options, and help ensure instructors are receiving the training and workflow support needed to make exam review more manageable.


