# Top 10 handlebars Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 3.9/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 13 The Other Web Frameworks Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with handlebars. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to handlebars include templates. The best overall handlebars alternative is Datatables. Other similar apps like handlebars are Ruby on Rails, JQuery UI, Font Awesome, and IHP. handlebars alternatives can be found in [Other Web Frameworks Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to handlebars - [Datatables](https://www.g2.com/products/datatables/reviews) - [Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews) - [JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/products/jquery-ui/reviews) - [Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews) - [IHP](https://www.g2.com/products/ihp/reviews) - [Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/products/material-design-for-bootstrap/reviews) - [ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/products/asp-net/reviews) - [WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/products/webrtc/reviews) - [Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/products/sinatra/reviews) - [fancybox](https://www.g2.com/products/fancybox/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to handlebars Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how handlebars stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Information Technology and Services, and Marketing and Advertising, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [Datatables](https://www.g2.com/products/datatables/reviews) By DataTables **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 20 Datatables is a plug-in for the jQuery Javascript library. It is a tool, build upon the foundations of progressive enhancement, that adds all of these advanced features to any HTML table. It helps for adding sorting and paging and filtering abilities. Reviewers say compared to handlebars, Datatables is: - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements - More expensive Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-handlebars) **Compare Datatables with other alternatives:** - [Datatables vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Datatables vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-jquery-ui) - [Datatables vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-font-awesome) - [Datatables vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-ihp) - [Datatables vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Datatables vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-datatables) - [Datatables vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-webrtc) - [Datatables vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-sinatra) - [Datatables vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-fancybox) ### 2. [Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews) By Open Source Initiative (OSI) **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 83 Ruby on Rails, commonly referred to as Rails, is an open-source server-side web application framework written in the Ruby programming language. It follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern, providing default structures for databases, web services, and web pages. Rails emphasizes the use of well-known software engineering principles such as Convention over Configuration (CoC) and Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY), aiming to simplify and accelerate the development of database-driven web applications. Key Features and Functionality: - Active Record: An object-relational mapping (ORM) layer that simplifies database interactions by representing tables as classes and rows as objects, allowing developers to perform database operations using Ruby code. - Action Pack: A component that combines the controller and view layers of the MVC framework, facilitating the handling of web requests and rendering of responses. - Active Support: A collection of utility classes and standard library extensions that enhance the Ruby language, providing additional functionalities to simplify coding tasks. - Action Mailer: A framework for designing email services, enabling the creation and delivery of emails from a Rails application. - Convention over Configuration (CoC): Rails reduces the need for explicit configuration by following established conventions, allowing developers to focus on application logic rather than boilerplate code. - Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY): This principle encourages the reduction of code duplication, promoting maintainability and scalability by ensuring that each piece of information has a single, unambiguous representation within the system. Primary Value and Problem Solving: Ruby on Rails streamlines the web development process by providing a comprehensive framework that integrates seamlessly with databases and web services. By adhering to the CoC and DRY principles, Rails minimizes the amount of code developers need to write, reducing the likelihood of errors and enhancing productivity. Its modular design and extensive library of gems (plugins) allow for rapid development and easy customization, making it an ideal choice for startups and enterprises aiming to build robust, scalable web applications efficiently. Reviewers say compared to handlebars, Ruby on Rails is: - Better at support - More usable - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-handlebars) **Compare Ruby on Rails with other alternatives:** - [Ruby on Rails vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-webrtc) - [Ruby on Rails vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-sinatra) - [Ruby on Rails vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-fancybox) ### 3. [JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/products/jquery-ui/reviews) By jqueryui **Average Rating:** 3.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 28 jQuery UI is a curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library. Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-handlebars) **Compare JQuery UI with other alternatives:** - [JQuery UI vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-jquery-ui) - [JQuery UI vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [JQuery UI vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-jquery-ui) - [JQuery UI vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-jquery-ui) - [JQuery UI vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [JQuery UI vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-jquery-ui) - [JQuery UI vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-webrtc) - [JQuery UI vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-sinatra) - [JQuery UI vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-fancybox) ### 4. [Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews) By Fort Awesome **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 34 Font Awesome is a comprehensive icon toolkit designed to enhance web and application interfaces with scalable vector icons. Since its inception in 2012, it has become a staple for developers and designers, offering a vast library of icons that can be customized in size, color, and style using CSS. As of 2024, Font Awesome is utilized by 25.4% of websites employing third-party font scripts, making it the second most popular choice after Google Fonts. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Icon Library: Provides thousands of icons across various categories, including web application icons, brand logos, and more. - Customizable Styles: Icons are available in multiple styles such as solid, regular, light, and duotone, allowing for seamless integration into diverse design aesthetics. - Scalability: As vector graphics, the icons maintain clarity and sharpness at any size, ensuring optimal display on high-resolution screens. - Ease of Use: Integrates effortlessly with web projects through simple CSS classes, enabling quick implementation without the need for additional JavaScript. - Regular Updates: Continuously expands its collection with new icons and features, keeping pace with evolving design trends and user needs. Primary Value and User Solutions: Font Awesome addresses the need for a versatile and easily implementable icon set that enhances user interfaces without compromising performance. By offering a wide range of icons that are both customizable and scalable, it empowers developers and designers to create visually appealing and consistent designs across various platforms. Its ease of integration and extensive documentation reduce development time, allowing for more efficient project workflows. Additionally, the regular introduction of new icons and styles ensures that users have access to contemporary design elements, keeping their projects modern and engaging. Reviewers say compared to handlebars, Font Awesome is: - More expensive - Better at support - More usable Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-handlebars) **Compare Font Awesome with other alternatives:** - [Font Awesome vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-font-awesome) - [Font Awesome vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Font Awesome vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-jquery-ui) - [Font Awesome vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-ihp) - [Font Awesome vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Font Awesome vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-font-awesome) - [Font Awesome vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-webrtc) - [Font Awesome vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-sinatra) - [Font Awesome vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-fancybox) ### 5. [IHP](https://www.g2.com/products/ihp/reviews) By digitally induced **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 211 IHP (Integrated Haskell Platform) is a comprehensive web framework designed to streamline the development of robust and type-safe web applications. Built on Haskell and Nix, IHP offers a productive and enjoyable development experience, enabling developers to build high-quality software efficiently. Its emphasis on server-side rendering, combined with modern development tools, positions IHP as a compelling choice for both newcomers and seasoned developers seeking a reliable and efficient web development framework. Key Features and Functionality: - Instant Live Reloading: IHP's development server automatically reloads code changes, reflecting updates instantly without resetting the page state, thereby enhancing the development workflow. - HSX (Haskell JSX): Inspired by React's JSX, HSX allows developers to write HTML directly within Haskell files. This code is type-checked and compiled at compile time, ensuring error-free templates and automatic escaping to prevent XSS attacks. - Web-Based Schema Designer: IHP includes a visual database schema designer, facilitating the creation and management of data structures. Changes made through this tool are reflected in actual SQL statements, maintaining compatibility with version control systems. - Security: Leveraging Haskell's strong type system, IHP mitigates common security vulnerabilities such as XSS and SQL injection, providing a secure foundation for web applications. - Productive Development Tooling: IHP offers a suite of web-based development tools, including a code generator and REPL, to accelerate the development process. - SQL-Centric Design: By promoting the use of plain SQL over complex ORMs, IHP provides simple database access functions that map directly to underlying SQL statements, ensuring clarity and efficiency. - Auto Refresh: IHP's Auto Refresh feature enables real-time data display by re-rendering views when underlying data changes, simplifying the implementation of dynamic content. Primary Value and Problem Solving: IHP addresses the challenges of modern web development by offering a type-safe, productive, and enjoyable framework that simplifies the creation of web applications. Its integration of Haskell's strong type system ensures reliability and security, while the inclusion of modern development tools and features like instant live reloading and HSX enhances developer productivity. By focusing on server-side rendering and providing a comprehensive set of tools, IHP enables developers to build high-quality web applications efficiently, reducing complexity and development time. Reviewers say compared to handlebars, IHP is: - More expensive - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-handlebars) **Compare IHP with other alternatives:** - [IHP vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-ihp) - [IHP vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [IHP vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-jquery-ui) - [IHP vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-ihp) - [IHP vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [IHP vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-ihp) - [IHP vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-webrtc) - [IHP vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-sinatra) - [IHP vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-fancybox) ### 6. [Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/products/material-design-for-bootstrap/reviews) By MDB **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 25 Material Design for Bootstrap is a free, powerful Material Design UI KIT for Bootstrap 4. It is a comprehensive material design frameworks that was created to date. Reviewers say compared to handlebars, Material Design for Bootstrap is: - Better at support - More expensive - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-handlebars) **Compare Material Design for Bootstrap with other alternatives:** - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-webrtc) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-sinatra) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-fancybox) ### 7. [ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/products/asp-net/reviews) By Microsoft **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 59 ASP.NET is an open-source web framework developed by Microsoft for building modern web applications and services using .NET. It is cross-platform, running on macOS, Windows, Linux, and Docker, enabling developers to create dynamic, high-performance web solutions across various environments. Key Features and Functionality: - Cross-Platform Compatibility: Develop and run applications seamlessly on macOS, Windows, Linux, and Docker. - Razor Syntax: Utilize Razor, a web-page templating syntax, to build dynamic web pages with C#. - Model-View-Controller (MVC) Pattern: Implement the MVC design pattern to achieve a clear separation of concerns, enhancing code maintainability and scalability. - Integrated Authentication System: Leverage built-in libraries and templates for handling user authentication, including multi-factor authentication and external providers like Google and X. - Real-Time Communication with SignalR: Enable real-time, bi-directional communication between server and client, facilitating interactive web applications. - Open-Source and Community-Driven: Benefit from a robust ecosystem with over 100,000 contributions and support from more than 3,700 companies. Primary Value and User Solutions: ASP.NET empowers developers to build versatile, high-performance web applications efficiently. Its cross-platform nature ensures flexibility in deployment, while the integration of modern development patterns and tools streamlines the development process. By providing a comprehensive framework with built-in support for authentication, real-time communication, and dynamic content generation, ASP.NET addresses the needs of developers seeking to create secure, scalable, and maintainable web solutions. Reviewers say compared to handlebars, ASP.NET is: - More expensive - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-handlebars) **Compare ASP.NET with other alternatives:** - [ASP.NET vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-datatables) - [ASP.NET vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [ASP.NET vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-jquery-ui) - [ASP.NET vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-font-awesome) - [ASP.NET vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-ihp) - [ASP.NET vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [ASP.NET vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-webrtc) - [ASP.NET vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-sinatra) - [ASP.NET vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-fancybox) ### 8. [WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/products/webrtc/reviews) By WebRTC **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 29 WebRTC is an open framework for the web that enables Real Time Communications in the browser. It includes the fundamental building blocks for high-quality communications on the web, such as network, audio and video components used in voice and video chat applications. Reviewers say compared to handlebars, WebRTC is: - More expensive - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/webrtc-vs-handlebars) **Compare WebRTC with other alternatives:** - [WebRTC vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/webrtc-vs-fancybox) ### 9. [Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/products/sinatra/reviews) By Open Source Initiative (OSI) **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 21 Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort: Reviewers say compared to handlebars, Sinatra is: - Better at support - More expensive - More usable Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-handlebars) **Compare Sinatra with other alternatives:** - [Sinatra vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-webrtc) - [Sinatra vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-fancybox) ### 10. [fancybox](https://www.g2.com/products/fancybox/reviews) By fancyapps **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Reviews:** 11 fancybox is a tool for displaying images, HTML content and multi-media in a Mac-style "lightbox" that floats overtop of web page. Reviewers say compared to handlebars, fancybox is: - More expensive - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with handlebars: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [handlebars vs fancybox](https://www.g2.com/compare/fancybox-vs-handlebars) **Compare fancybox with other alternatives:** - [fancybox vs Datatables](https://www.g2.com/compare/datatables-vs-fancybox) - [fancybox vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-fancybox) - [fancybox vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-fancybox) - [fancybox vs Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-fancybox) - [fancybox vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-fancybox) - [fancybox vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-fancybox) - [fancybox vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-fancybox) - [fancybox vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/webrtc-vs-fancybox) - [fancybox vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-fancybox) ## Explore Articles - [Which affiliate marketing tools make it easy for publishers and partners to track their own performance without constantly pinging your team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-affiliate-marketing-tools-make-it-easy-for-publishers-and-partners-to-track-their-own-performance-without-constantly-pinging-your-team) - [Is a dedicated publisher ad server worth it for a mid-size content site?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-a-dedicated-publisher-ad-server-worth-it-for-a-mid-size-content-site) - [Best platforms for real-time data integration](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-platforms-for-real-time-data-integration) - [Leading spend management services for startups](https://www.g2.com/discussions/leading-spend-management-services-for-startups-which-tools-help-you-move-fast-without-losing-control) - [What is the most affordable website builder for SMBs?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-website-builder-for-smbs) - [OutSystems vs Mendix vs Microsoft Power Apps for a mid-market company that wants to build custom apps without building a full dev team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/outsystems-vs-mendix-vs-microsoft-power-apps-for-a-mid-market-company-that-wants-to-build-custom-apps-without-building-a-full-dev-team) ## Spotlight Categories - [Employee Recognition Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/employee-recognition) - [Spend Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/spend-management) - [HCM Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/hcm-software)