--- title: codebeamer Reviews meta_title: 'codebeamer Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 141 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how codebeamer works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.3 review_count: 141 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-10-23' parent_category: name: DevOps url: https://www.g2.com/categories/devops ---

codebeamer Reviews & Product Details

Profile Status

This profile is currently managed by codebeamer but has limited features.

Are you part of the codebeamer team? Upgrade your plan to enhance your branding and engage with visitors to your profile!

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

4 months

Return on Investment

21 months

User Insights

Average based on 141 real user reviews.

Implementation Time

4 months

Perceived Cost

$$$$$

codebeamer Reviews (141)

View 1 Video Reviews
Reviews

codebeamer Reviews (141)

View 1 Video Reviews
4.3
141 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise Codebeamer for its flexibility and traceability, which allow for effective management of complex projects and compliance with industry standards. The platform's ability to customize workflows and integrate with other tools enhances team collaboration and efficiency. However, many users note a common limitation: the interface can be complex for new users, leading to a steeper learning curve.

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Verified User in Automotive
UA
Verified User in Automotive
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Full ALM solution for Automotive Software development and Requirements Management"
5/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

I introduced and used codeBeamer already in the second automotive startup company. codeBeamer provides a full ASPICE process capability out of the box. It supports the dynamic growth of your team while keeping you able to fulfill the automotive process requirements without too many manual tasks. It also saves you from the hassles that bigger, and older companies have with their complex mix of self-developed and commercial toolboxes to resemble a comparable ALM solution. And if there is a need for integration with external tools (e.g. customer ticket systems, CI/CD, SWQ tools) the REST API makes it easy to do.

An aspect often overlooked is the integration of SW code repositories. So full traceability from requirements, tasks, user stories to source code lines is there from the start without manual work and external scripting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

A first-time user is easily overwhelmed by the number of features included in codeBeamer. While I have no idea how to solve that, maybe a beginner/expert view mode would help in the onboarding process of new users by hiding the complex functions at first. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Automotive
UA
Verified User in Automotive
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"DOORS on steroids"
4/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

Great Project Management and Requirements Management system in a very responsive user interface. Its open architecture provides 3rd party integration to Software Configuration Management systems, to other Requirements Management systems, to Test Automation (Jenkins) and Management systems. Simple Microsoft Excel roundtrip (import/export), super helpful in discussions with local teams and small customer/supplier collaboration. Fulfills ASPICE, provides out-of-the-box templates (e.g., Automotive, Functional Safety), and most of the features are customizable! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

Filters and initial setup could feel overwhelming - luckily, the templates, help, and support make it easier. It could be perceived as an overkill, from the perspective of a small team or a department just introduced to Application Lifecycle Management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RZ
Ralf Z.
C
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Ralf"
4.5/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

Data objects; workflows; templates; data model Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

So far I'm not clear regarding reference business cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
UH
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Quite robust tool"
4/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

Holistic performance of the tool. Vey much integrated and can be customizable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

Expensive. I am sometimes getting lost with too many trackers and configurations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RA
Rich A.
Director, Instrumentation Software
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Codebeamer"
4.5/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

The Medical Software Engineering Template makes porting our existing process into CodebeamerX seamless Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

We do not see any downsides to the product Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Automotive
AA
Verified User in Automotive
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Best ALM tool for software development"
5/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

Totally configurable, very friendly user interface, amazing knowledge base, very detailed documentation, totally scalable.Excellent tech support is also very helpful. Low cost ALM tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

Integration with some of industry standard model based design tools such as simulink exist but can use some further improvements. Integration with PLM tools (industry accepted tools such as Windchill, SAP) can use some improvements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Military
AM
Verified User in Military
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Codebeamer has helped my project manage all aspects of our projects."
4.5/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

The trackers and all the different ways you can customize them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

A MS Project feature needs to be added to codeBeamer. JIRA has a BigPicture plugin that could be copied for codeBeamer. The MS Project export feature has some issues and could be fixed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Medical Devices
EM
Verified User in Medical Devices
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Trying to make cB agile in a way that it will support company growth and growth of company processes"
4/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

traceability from initial requirements to test cases, branching (working sets), Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

the fact that you need to pay for everything, we want to use a support portal in cB, other tools are offering free licenses for customers and only agents need to pay for using the portal. This would be then a proper ALM tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RB
Rami B.
Software Quality Assurance and Processes Manager
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"I'm using codeBeamer for 3+ years, mostly as Quality Projects and Processes Manager"
3.5/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

The fact it's adjusted to ASPICE and allows to manage all the work products Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

The interface is not very intuitive; the reporting options are poor, Collapse feature had been eliminated Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Danish M.
DM
Danish M.
Principal Engineer Medical Device Design
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"cbX is perfect for MD development"
4.5/5
What do you like best about codebeamer?

The cbX is extremely flexible to configure Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about codebeamer?

Sometimes the configurations could not be implemented as desired. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Questions about codebeamer? Ask real users or explore answers from the community

Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

GU
Guest User

What is codebeamer used for?

0 Upvotes
0
Join the conversation
RZ
Ralf Zieger
•
Last activity over 4 years ago

Reference business case for CSV/Medical device?

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

4 months

Return on Investment

21 months

Average Discount

16%

codebeamer Comparisons
codebeamer Features
Requirements Listing
Centralized Information
Traceability
Stakeholder Communication
Internal Communication Enablement
Automated Creation & Testing