Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Jama Connect and codebeamer 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Jama Connect
Star Rating
(188)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Jama Connectcodebeamer
Star Rating
(140)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about codebeamerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Jama Connect excels in user experience, particularly highlighting its intuitive user interface and ease of use, which helps new users get up to speed quickly. In contrast, while codebeamer is praised for its comprehensive features, some users find it less user-friendly, noting that it can be challenging to navigate at times.
- Users say that Jama Connect's live traceability feature is a standout, allowing teams to easily track requirements throughout the development process. Meanwhile, codebeamer also offers robust traceability, with users appreciating its ability to link development, testing, and compliance processes effectively, making it particularly suitable for technical requirements.
- Reviewers mention that Jama Connect's review center for requirements is excellent, facilitating collaboration and feedback among team members. On the other hand, codebeamer is recognized for its centralized approach to product development, integrating requirements, test cases, tasks, and risks into one platform, which some users find invaluable for managing complex projects.
- According to verified reviews, Jama Connect has a slight edge in support quality, with users noting that the assistance provided is responsive and helpful. In comparison, codebeamer users also report satisfactory support experiences, but some have indicated that there is room for improvement in response times.
- G2 reviewers highlight that both products are well-suited for mid-market companies, but Jama Connect has a broader appeal due to its extensive customization options and linking capabilities, which users find extremely useful. Codebeamer, while effective, is often seen as more specialized for technical requirements, which may limit its appeal to a wider audience.
- Users report that codebeamer shines in its end-to-end traceability and effective requirements management, making it a strong choice for industries with stringent compliance needs. However, Jama Connect's overall higher G2 Score reflects a more favorable reception among users, indicating a stronger overall satisfaction with its features and usability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jama Connect
No pricing availablecodebeamer
No pricing availableFree Trial
Jama Connect
Free Trial is available
codebeamer
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
166
8.4
97
Ease of Use
8.3
169
8.0
98
Ease of Setup
7.8
116
7.7
71
Ease of Admin
8.1
102
7.9
67
Quality of Support
8.6
156
8.3
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
102
8.6
62
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
162
8.4
90
Features by Category
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
110
8.2
46
9.0
112
8.8
45
9.0
113
8.7
46
Communication
8.4
107
7.8
43
8.3
104
8.5
41
Procedural
7.1
89
7.7
38
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jama Connect and codebeamer are categorized as Requirements Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jama Connect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
codebeamer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Medical Devices
24.7%
Information Technology and Services
8.1%
Automotive
7.5%
Computer Software
6.5%
Telecommunications
5.4%
Other
47.8%
Automotive
30.9%
Medical Devices
23.0%
Computer Software
5.0%
Aviation & Aerospace
4.3%
Industrial Automation
3.6%
Other
33.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Are there demand on synchronization of Test Steps data field from test cases between two Jama instances through Tasktop Integration Hub tool?
2 Comments
DW
Hi Lien! It looks like Tasktop introduced Test Synchronization earlier this year. Here is a link offering additional information -...Read more
What other tools are out there that, in your opinion can compete with Jama Connect?
2 Comments
Official Response from Olive
Olive helps companies collaboratively rank requirements and uses machine learning to match the results with solutions.Read more
Hello, I was wondering what is the duration of your Free Trial?
1 Comment
Official Response from Jama Connect
Hi David - We offer free 30 day trials of Jama Connect. Please visit this page for more information and to...Read more
highlighting on same customer requirements
1 Comment
JD
Hello Dhilippan
Thanks for your request.
We have some similar feature requests from our customers. We are working on some AI capabilities and this is one...Read more
Reference business case for CSV/Medical device?
1 Comment
NS
Hi Ralf!
While we do not have a case study on this particular topic, we have many clients in the healthcare/pharmaceutical area and all of them have...Read more
codebeamer has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
