Users report that codebeamer excels in "Requirements Listing" with a score of 8.2, while Polarion shines even brighter with a score of 9.4, indicating a more robust feature set for managing requirements.
Reviewers mention that Polarion offers superior "Centralized Information" capabilities, scoring 9.7 compared to codebeamer's 8.8, which suggests that Polarion provides a more integrated approach to information management.
G2 users highlight that Polarion's "Traceability" feature is particularly strong, achieving a score of 9.7, while codebeamer follows closely with 8.7, showing that both products are effective but Polarion may offer more comprehensive tracking capabilities.
Users on G2 indicate that Polarion significantly outperforms codebeamer in "Stakeholder Communication," with a score of 9.2 versus codebeamer's 7.8, suggesting that Polarion may facilitate better engagement with stakeholders.
Reviewers say that codebeamer's "Automated Creation & Testing" feature scores 7.6, which is lower than Polarion's 8.6, indicating that Polarion may provide more advanced automation tools for testing and creation processes.
Users report that while both products have good support, codebeamer's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.3, slightly lower than Polarion's 8.4, suggesting that users may find Polarion's support to be marginally more effective.
Hello Dhilippan
Thanks for your request.
We have some similar feature requests from our customers. We are working on some AI capabilities and this is one...Read more
Reference business case for CSV/Medical device?
1 Comment
NS
Hi Ralf!
While we do not have a case study on this particular topic, we have many clients in the healthcare/pharmaceutical area and all of them have...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.