codebeamer Reviews & Product Details

With minimal effort, codebeamer integrates with most PLM solutions to enable end-to-end traceability and provides OOTB templates to meet functional safety guidelines for various industries. I managed ALM/PLM integrations and saw firsthand how codebeamer supported most use cases with minimal effort for Customers in different industries (Automotive/Hi-tech/Heavy Equipment). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't see anything that this product was missing. I do think more on-demand training videos would help. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For the first instance, I had in house training. The training material, trainer expertise, and overall training workflow was best and easy to understood. Now I am using CB for most of the project work which includes all the aspects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can not find dislike but long term feedback from the Users would be a good idea and implement the required change to meet the trend. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its richness of features, configurability, and input/export capabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Traceability browser is quite cumbersome to use and lacks a visualisation of the items and the links between them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One tool for all Development related activities such as Requirements Management, Testing, Risk, but also Project Management (well suited for agile PM methods), Knowledge sharing (Wiki). Easy to learn and be productive quickly - especially thanks to provided Project Templates, many Video Tutorials and good documentation. Well suited for collaboration with external partners, thanks to granular Groups and Roles settings. Good configurability (flexible enough, but not overcomplicated), Video Tutorials also for advanced topics such as Word export Templates. Good support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd appreciate a better integration with other tools such as Enterprise Architect or PLM Systems. There is some potential for improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

That we can configure a lot (even though we cause issues with "messed up configuration" - but that's our fault), browser-based access (even for external partners) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loading time of certain pages. No chance of configuring basic functionality. For example, we still desire to have an option to activate the function to open/collapse below the tracker tree below the clicked item again (This feature was removed due to performance issues with some customers, but for us it was very helpful!) No chance so far to configure the traceability that it shows only the latest test run of test cases and only the test runs of the test case itself instead of test sets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It supports different project management methodologies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Difficult UI to use, it has reached a tipping point that discourages users to continue to use it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

(experience from 2015-2017) codeBemaer supports full ALM scope. End-to-end traceability and configuration capability are impressive. Many small details save you a lot of time, e.g., test parametrization, re-use of test cases, test steps. The reporting feature helps you not to miss the project progress and support your management with night letters. If you are missing something, no problem to write your widget or connect codeBeamer via rest API with your system. You can do almost everything you need; you can adapt the configuration in every process directly in the codeBemaer GUI. This tool is really flexible. The best at the end is that intland is hearing to customer voice. The support team is aloways trying to underrstand your needs. Many of our ideas has been accepted and implement in new release very quicly. Beffore implementation of new features, the support team is seeking for a solution and workarround how to support the customer needs. (by today) I am still following the ALM market and Intland is really growing and improving the ALM solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

(experience from 2015-2017) The advantage of flexibility and configuration complexity can also be a disadvantage. You need to define the project configuration very thoroughly. I am missing some integrated features for project planning, including Gantt charts or collaborative/interactive planning. Also, the support of Google suite will be appreciated. Our team has been facing an issue of export templates' backward compatibility in the past. CodeBemear solved it by introducing new release management. We could not assign a floating license to a dedicated project team, but an enterprise contract agreement solved our issue. In the meantime, we wrote a plugin showing which team is using how many floating licenses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Currently, I'm using CodeBeamer as a developer, and me and my team, we are trying to create a framework that we could use for designing, implementing and handling projects relevant to ISO26262 and SOTIF, but I've seen that Codebeamer could be used for many other purposes as a requirements handler tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing so far! Maybe we didn't test the full depth of this software application yet, but yes, so far, so good! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Support all kinds of processes, and CB is very configurable to serve all project needs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how to collaborate. It does not seem like Intland is aware of how to manage a product and willing to listen to customer needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I found CodeBeamer easy to learn and use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As far as using Codebeamer, I don't remember anything I didn't like about the product. My observation is that it may not be as well known as a competitor so the pool of people to hire or work with using CodeBeamer may not be as large. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.