--- title: Building Engines Reviews meta_title: 'Building Engines Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 284 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Building Engines works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.5 review_count: 284 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-11-09' parent_category: name: 'Property Management ' url: https://www.g2.com/categories/property-management-3a460840-65b6-4e78-813b-d467d3e65143 ---

Building Engines Pros and Cons: Top 5 Advantages and Disadvantages

Quick AI Summary Based on G2 Reviews

Generated from real user reviews

Users find Building Engines to be easy to use, enjoying its intuitive interface and seamless property management features. (54 mentions)
Users appreciate the user-friendly design of Building Engines, simplifying property management for both managers and tenants. (33 mentions)
Users value the easy navigation of Building Engines, enhancing their experience in managing properties efficiently. (22 mentions)
Users appreciate the efficiency of Building Engines, enjoying its streamlined management and organization of work orders. (18 mentions)
Users value the centralized information access of Building Engines, streamlining property management and communication effectively. (18 mentions)
Users desire more functional features in Building Engines, including integrations, a dispatch board, and improved inspections. (18 mentions)
Users find the navigation issues in Building Engines cumbersome, leading to a frustrating and time-consuming experience. (7 mentions)
Users find poor usability in Building Engines, citing difficulty in navigating work orders and managing user access effectively. (7 mentions)
Users report communication issues, including notification failures and excessive emails, complicating their experience with Building Engines. (5 mentions)
Users experience slow performance with Building Engines, particularly when managing large portfolios and using the mobile app. (5 mentions)

5 Pros or Advantages of Building Engines

5 Cons or Disadvantages of Building Engines

Building Engines Reviews FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: Nov 04, 2026

What is Building Engines, and what problem is it built to solve?

Building Engines is used to organize day-to-day building operations, including tenant service requests, work orders, maintenance, inspections, and communication among property teams, tenants, and contractors. It gives teams a shared place to track tasks and their progress.

What languages does Building Engines support?

Building Engines supports 1 language: English.

What company sizes and industries is Building Engines the best fit for?

Building Engines appears to be most relevant to small businesses, mid-market organizations, and enterprises, particularly in commercial real estate and building operations. The strongest reviewer-reported segments include:
  • Company size — Small business: A prominent segment among positive reviewers.
  • Company size — Mid-market: Also well represented among positive reviewers.
  • Company size — Enterprise: Positive reviews also come from enterprise organizations.
  • Industry — Commercial real estate and real estate: These are the most prominent industry groups.
  • Industry — Facilities services: Another notable group using the product.
  • Industry — Retail: Also represented among positive reviewers.

How long does it take to implement Building Engines across a team?

Implementation timelines vary with the amount of setup and data involved, but reports most often place go-live within the first three months. Longer timelines also occur, particularly when setup requires more extensive configuration.

What customer support options does Building Engines provide, and how do users find the overall support experience?

The support experience is often described as responsive and helpful, with issues resolved and guidance available when teams need it. Some users encounter slower follow-through or difficulty getting a timely answer, so the experience can vary.

What is the experience like for teams switching to Building Engines from another tool?

Switching to Building Engines is often about replacing an older or less convenient work-order process with a more usable, centralized system. Prior tools include property-management platforms such as MRI Angus and MRI Property Management, products in the Rise family, and maintenance or work-order systems such as Corrigo and Public 360; the change is commonly tied to easier navigation, broader operational functionality, mobile access, or consolidating work that had been handled manually or across separate tools. The transition can require adjustment and, in some cases, manual data entry.

What features or capabilities could make Building Engines even more useful?

Building Engines could be more useful with more flexible reporting and smoother ways to find and filter information. Recurring improvements that would strengthen everyday work include:
  • More adaptable reporting and search: Make it easier to build tailored reports, retrieve older records, and narrow results to the right property or task.
  • A more consistent mobile experience: Improve reliability and bring mobile workflows closer to the capabilities available on desktop.
  • More configurable workflows: Reduce repetitive data entry and allow teams to adjust processes, notifications, and settings to suit their properties.

Building Engines Reviews (284)

View 1 Video Reviews
Reviews

Building Engines Reviews (284)

View 1 Video Reviews
4.5
284 reviews
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
SN
Syed N.
Facilities Manager
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Originally submitted 3/24/2026
"Streamlined Workflow Management with User-Friendly Interface"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

I really like Building Engines because it's user-friendly and has ease of use. It's kind of like a one-stop shop that makes my life easier, helping with managing and maintaining workflow, and improving visibility and communication with all parties, including tenants and contractors. I also appreciate the live status updates, emails, notifications, and such, which are really good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

When we create a work order in Prism, it needs to transfer and sync with the JLL internal platform called MRI. Right now, every 24, 48, or 72 hours, it just syncs, but sometimes it doesn't sync successfully. I'd suggest implementing a system where changes sync at the end of the day, regardless of the current time intervals, to avoid constant updates and improve efficiency. Also, a video upload feature would be great for the facilities related issues. The feature is there, however it seems crashing all the times. I like to request another WO status "Financially Completed". Status "Complete", when works performed, product delivered, and Financially Completed when the invoice paid. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

KE
Kevin E.
Finance & Operations Coordinator
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Prism by Building Engines a modern and flexible facilities management system"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

I have been using Prism since November. I enjoy the clean user interface and that it's an intuitive platform. Onboarding was a simple process as our building data was uploaded into Prism (not historical work orders however). I found that I was easily able to make the required updates and amendments so that the system would operate in the best way to meet our business requirement. I enjoy that the system is actively developed and new features are always being added. Due to it being a new platform that's constantly being improved I have on occasion found glitches and problems. However, the Building Engines support team have been very helpful. This is includes support over different timezones, for example we are in the Asia Pacific region not in the USA. I also enjoy the online learning platform that is in place to help learn more about using the product. The Prism platform I find to be very responsive in terms of speed, the only times that I've found it to lag is when the Building Engines team are performing system maintenance. AI features are still relatively new in Prism so I find that they are still improving and not the finished product yet, but I'm sure that this will be actively developed in future updates. In general I've enjoyed moving across to the Buildings Engine Prism product and have found that it's been a very efficient and customisable product that has helped our organisation substantially reduce our open work order count. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

I don't have too many negatives about using Prism by Building Engines and I'm also mindful that updates and bug fixes are consistently happening. Being in Australia and Building Engines being a US company brings its challenges. Whilst there is an Aust/Pacific support region for standard support which is helpful I can't help think that having a designated support contact would be beneficial. This could be someone in our region that we could build a relationship with, they could learn about our business, and the support could be tailored to our needs. On a product note I'd like it if reports in Prism could be more customisable or built from scratch. Maybe this is a feature that will come in a future update. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Commercial Real Estate
AC
Verified User in Commercial Real Estate
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Intuitive UI and Handy Message Cloning/Search—Contracts Could Be Better"
3.5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

The UI of Building Engines is intuitive and easy to learn especially for someone who has never used it before. I mostly use Prism to schedule communications with tenants and I like the cloning feature and also the search so that I can easily edit a message I've previously sent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

I think adding Contracts is a useless step, it just feels like you already have so much work that goes into a contract and it's a pain to have to re-enter all the information. Same for COIs, I like this one better because it's tracking, but having to enter tedious information over and over again takes up a chunk of time that could be dedicated to something else. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Corsina A.
CA
Corsina A.
Engineering & Operations Manager
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 5/20/2026
"Easy Work Order Tracking, Despite Delays in Sharing"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

I like how easy it is to navigate the workflows. I also value being able to track work orders that have been raised, completed, and are in progress with contractors. Building Engines also keeps track of preventative maintenance and tenant compliance due dates. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

I sometimes experience lag in Building Engines, especially when sharing work orders. It can take up to four hours for a work order to be generated and sent to the listed email. The transition also took a little bit of time to make sure work orders were accurately listed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Marco R.
MR
Marco R.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 11/2/2026
"Building Engineer"
5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

I’m always on schedule with Building Engines. I like the service requests from tenants because they help me complete tasks on time. I also use it to communicate with tenants, keep track of PM service, and perform daily inspections. The initial setup was very easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

I sometimes get a service ticket on the desktop but not on the phone, or it arrives with a delay. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jacqueline D.
JD
Jacqueline D.
Assistant Property Manager
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Efficient Platform Enhancing Tenant Communication and Productivity"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

I really enjoy the transparency in tenant communication that Building Engines offers. Anyone who uses the platform can communicate with tenants and maintain a historical record of those conversations for future reference, which is especially helpful for billable charges and reoccurring events. Our tenants and staff are able to submit work orders via the app or desktop and track, in real time, completions and updates. That visibility makes follow-up much easier and helps ensure tenant satisfaction stays a priority.

Building Engines has also solved time management issues for us. The ability to create an invoice directly from a work order is a great feature; before the software, all invoicing was done manually in Excel. Now the information is streamlined and organized in a way that substantially reduces human error, and it has increased our tenant service revenue. the Invoices look very professional and can be designed to include any background information relevant to the request. The initial setup was fairly easy, and the support we received was exceptional, which made the process feel seamless overall. I appreciate that there are many service modules to choose from based on your operational needs and it's all for a reasonable cost, considering it includes 24/7 customer support if ever needed. I highly recommend this platform and would give it a nine. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

I don't currently have dislikes for the system. Its working great so far in the early stages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RS
Raymond S.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Comprehensive Features, Challenging Setup"
4/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

I like that Building Engines is complex and can do multiple things. It supports building operations and can perform a variety of tasks related to property management and engineering. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

Setup can be really complex. The initial setup with equipment and how it has to be imported to match up and align with the system setup is tricky, especially with naming conventions being key. There are long processes involved in setting up for tenancy, like assigning tenant orders and work order billing. It feels like a lot of steps just to organize things and send billable tickets. You almost need to be a top tier system administrator to get full functionality out of it. Plus, it wasn't easy to start with, requiring a lot of learning and training courses to get proficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rana A.
RA
Rana A.
Retail Marketing Manager
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 10/1/2025
"All-in-One Platform for Efficient Property Management"
5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

Building Engines makes managing properties simple & efficient. I love how it centralizes work orders, compliance tracking, and tenant communications—all in one user-friendly platform. Implementation was straightforward, the platform is intuitive, and I use it weekly. Integration across multiple properties is seamless. I also enjoyed the Prism courses on JLLT University, which helped me earn my Prism User Certification. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

I don’t really have any dislikes—Building Engines is very user-friendly. The one time I had an issue with the filter not properly separating users between my two properties, a software update resolved it, and I haven’t encountered any problems since then Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Umashankar P.
UP
Umashankar P.
Campus and Mobilization Lead
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Streamlined Feedback Collection with Heat Map Insights"
5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

I find Building Engines useful because it has data from the date of inception, which allows me to see things for many years now. The heat map is particularly beneficial since it shows the number of tickets and their flow rate at different times, helping me identify key issues to focus on and prioritize addressing areas with frequent or repeated complaints. The dashboard is also helpful, providing an overview that assists me in my tasks. Additionally, the initial setup was quite easy with one-time data sharing, which I find convenient. The integration with the JLL dashboard also adds to its utility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

absence of real time notifications in mobile Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Simon B.
SB
Simon B.
Traffic Controller
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Prism Streamlines Work Orders, Mobile Updates, and Proactive Maintenance"
5/5
What do you like best about Building Engines?

Consolidates requests into one system with clean UX. Integrates with existing building management platforms. Fast performance across properties. Delivers ROI by streamlining operations and reducing response times. Reporting provides data-driven maintenance insights at scale. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Building Engines?

AI/intelligence features could be more advanced for predictive maintenance. Some integrations require manual configuration. Onboarding documentation could include more real-world use cases. Pricing transparency for add-on modules would be helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.