How would you rate your experience with Assembly Neos?
Averages based on real user reviews.
2 months
15 months
9%
The easy way it is to organize our files and the ability to use AI to shorten the amount of time it takes to review a file. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have a hard time with using the checklists. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Inability to customize internal risk taxonomies in this way is a drawback to the Assembly Neos solution that I really value. We are also able to tailor the categories and scoring unique to our operational risks across unit business lines. It is the most accurate and tailored picture of our risk landscape around the world. The attachment of direct evidence to CWs is also a rather useful feature where we find our control documentation to be both comprehensive, and simple to audit. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The initial configuration of the organizational structure and the user permissions was actually a time investment. It had to be planned with much care to save on reworking in future. Though it is strong, the variety of possibilities to customize reporting seemed to be too much to take at first. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Thank you for sharing such thoughtful feedback. We’re glad Neos is helping you tailor categories and scoring to your operational risks and attach evidence in a way that supports more confident, audit-ready documentation.
We also appreciate the note on the upfront time investment for org structure and permissions, plus the initial learning curve with reporting customization. Your Customer Success Manager would be happy to share best practices and onboarding guidance to help make configuration and reporting feel more manageable.
