# Top tools for collaborative recruitment workflows

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hey G2 community, I’m curious. What do you think are the best tools for <strong>collaborative recruitment workflows</strong>? I’m putting together a list of top-rated platforms in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/candidate-relationship-management">candidate relationship management </a>category that help recruiters, hiring managers, and agencies work together more effectively. If you’ve used any of these or know of others worth adding, I’d love to hear your thoughts. I’d especially love feedback from teams using Bullhorn, Crelate Talent, or Manatal.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bullhorn/reviews"><strong>Bullhorn</strong></a>: Bullhorn is popular with staffing agencies for centralizing candidate data and automating workflows. Its collaboration tools let recruiters and account managers share notes, track communication history, and manage candidate pipelines together.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/crelate/reviews"><strong>Crelate Talent</strong></a>: Crelate offers a mix of ATS and CRM features, designed for agencies and in-house teams. Its collaboration functions include shared workflows, activity tracking, and candidate tagging to keep everyone aligned on hiring progress.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/manatal/reviews"><strong>Manatal</strong></a>: Manatal provides AI-powered candidate recommendations alongside team collaboration tools. Recruiters can assign tasks, comment on profiles, and share candidate shortlists to make hiring more collaborative.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/icims/reviews"><strong>iCIMS Talent Cloud</strong></a>: iCIMS supports collaborative recruiting by integrating candidate pipelines with hiring manager reviews, feedback loops, and analytics dashboards for better decision-making.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/smartrecruiters/reviews"><strong>SmartRecruiters</strong></a>: SmartRecruiters is built for team-based hiring with features like shared interview scorecards, task management, and real-time updates. It’s strong for organizations needing structured collaboration across recruiters and hiring managers.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zoho-recruit/reviews"><strong>Zoho Recruit</strong></a>: Zoho Recruit combines ATS and CRM functions with team collaboration tools like role-based access, workflow automation, and shared communication logs. It’s a budget-friendly option for SMB recruiting teams.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What do you think of these suggestions? Have you used one of them or another platform entirely to improve collaboration in your recruitment process? Which features made the biggest difference for your team?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 7 months ago
- Author title: Industry Analyst
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Want more resources on Candidate relationship management software? Check here: https://www.g2.com/categories/candidate-relationship-management/resources&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 months ago
- Author title: Industry Analyst





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: almost 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: almost 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: almost 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


