Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and k6 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance Engineeringk6
Star Rating
(31)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about k6Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in its comprehensive Test Variety, allowing for a wide range of testing scenarios, which is particularly beneficial for large enterprises with complex applications. In contrast, k6 is noted for its strong performance in Stress Testing, with reviewers mentioning that it effectively simulates high user loads with minimal resource consumption.
- Reviewers mention that the Ease of Setup for k6 is significantly higher, with a score of 9.6 compared to LoadRunner's 6.7. Users appreciate k6's straightforward installation process and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for teams without extensive technical expertise.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText LoadRunner Professional provides robust Reporting features, scoring 9.0, which allows for detailed insights into test results. However, users on G2 note that k6's reporting capabilities, while effective, are less comprehensive, scoring 8.6, which may limit in-depth analysis for some users.
- Reviewers mention that LoadRunner's Quality of Support is rated at 7.6, which some users find lacking in responsiveness. In contrast, k6 users report a higher satisfaction with support, scoring 9.3, indicating a more reliable and helpful customer service experience.
- Users say that OpenText LoadRunner Professional shines in its ability to handle Extreme Cases, with a score of 7.4, making it suitable for testing under unusual conditions. However, k6 outperforms in this area with a score of 9.2, as users report it effectively manages edge cases with ease.
- Reviewers mention that while LoadRunner has a strong Product Direction score of 8.5, k6 stands out with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that users feel confident in k6's ongoing development and future enhancements, which is a critical factor for long-term investment.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availablek6
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availablek6
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
23
9.3
14
Ease of Use
8.3
24
9.2
15
Ease of Setup
6.7
9
9.6
9
Ease of Admin
7.4
9
9.4
9
Quality of Support
7.6
24
9.3
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
9.3
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
23
10.0
14
Features by Category
Functionality
8.3
7
9.5
13
7.4
7
9.2
12
9.3
7
8.6
13
Reporting
9.0
7
8.6
13
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and k6 are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
k6 has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
k6
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Computer Software
26.7%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Retail
6.7%
Financial Services
6.7%
Other
36.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
Hi guys, please teach me how to write the response body o whatever data, in a txt file, csv o .dat file as a dataset for subsequent requests. ?
1 Comment
PC
Hi Cesar,
we could assist you better if you post your question to the k6 OSS community forum:
https://community.k6.io/c/k6-support/
It would be...Read more
What is k6 performance tool?
1 Comment
MB
Basically, it's a powerful, modern framework for performance testing.Read more
k6 has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
