Having used the tool extensively, this reviewer finds Wizer unique in its focus on decision-making metrics, helping teams identify biases. The reviewer notes the lack of current integration with external systems as a limitation.
View Full Review
I've run more team assessments than I care to count. Myers-Briggs, DiSC, Insights Discovery, Predictive Index, Hogan, Strengths Finder — at various points all of them have been part of how we tried to understand our teams.
The pattern was always the same. People would enjoy the workshop, share their colour or type or letter, put the profile on their desk, and three months later nothing about how the team actually worked had changed. The assessments told us who people were. They didn't tell us anything useful about how decisions were being made.
Wizer is the first tool I've used that does the thing I actually wanted those assessments to do. It maps how each person makes decisions — not their personality, not their preferences, but the lens they bring when they're weighing a real call. And then it shows that mix at a team and organisational level, which is where the patterns get interesting. You can see which thinking styles dominate, which are missing entirely, and where the team is going to struggle long before the struggle shows up.
The shift from personality language to decision language has changed how my teams talk about themselves. It's no longer "she's an introvert, that's why she didn't speak up." It's "we didn't have a Guardian voice in that conversation, and we missed the risk." That's a different kind of conversation. It's also a more useful one. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The category language is still settling. "Decision science platform" is the right description, but it doesn't slot into the existing assessment-tool box buyers are used to — which means you sometimes have to explain what it is before you can explain what it does. The platform itself is clear; the category positioning is the part of the market that's still catching up to what Wizer actually is. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Before we started using Wizer, our board was making investment decisions the way we always have, a mix of evidence and gut feel from our directors. We have a diverse group but they would still often move together as one.
Wizer helped to surface patterns we hadn't seen, including a tendency to defer to the same voices on the same kinds of decisions. Once we could see it, we could design around it.
The Panel Strength view became a working tool, not a one-off insight. We now use it to compose committees and working groups deliberately, based on the decision in front of us rather than on who's available. The Recommendation Engine has pointed us toward voices we'd previously overlooked, which has changed our decision quality of some very significant calls that have had a big upside. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Not much - this is a highly intuitive platform that helps me in both everyday tasks and vital important decisions with impressive results Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Wizer is the best Decision Intelligence tool I’ve come across, and using it across our sales and revenue team has lifted results markedly. The team is now better able to tailor their messages to key decision makers, which has made our outreach feel more targeted and effective. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Wizer continues to refine the tolls available, they haven't always integrated well but each release sees this improving. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Wizer removes the stigma of diverse consultation allowing leaders to achieve better outcomes through deliberate categories of input Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Looking forward to seeing how it evolves in terms of integrating to my workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pricing provided by Wizer - Decision Science....