SAP Fieldglass Reviews & Product Details

I appreciate how Fieldglass simplifies contractor management by offering centralized workflows, automated approval processes, and robust reporting features that help with compliance and controlling spend. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about SAP Fieldglass is that the interface can feel unintuitive at times. Some tasks take more clicks than expected, and certain workflows feel more rigid than they need to be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest thing that I like with SAP Fieldglass is the compliance and risk management. It handles tenure tracking and mitigates coemployment risks, which is really important for us. An honorable mention would be the automation, which is ultimately very time-saving. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the supplier management piece could be improved, particularly the evaluation and management of suppliers and staffing agencies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I just like how all things come together in one place with SAP Fieldglass. It helps with consolidating all the SOWs, making it easy to approve timesheets and track the approved budget from a cost center. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Logging into SAP Fieldglass is a very bad experience. I had to change my password multiple times because it doesn’t have SSO. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the visibility and extended functionality of SAP Fieldglass very helpful. It works across different countries and markets and provides a clear audit trail. I appreciate that everything linked to a user, like rates, tenure, and approvals, is managed in one place. It's great that it integrates seamlessly with other SAP products that handle our key financial and accounting processes. I also enjoy that tracking information doesn't require digging through emails or dealing with the overhead of manual spreadsheets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the usability a key challenge; sometimes it's slow in certain actions and feels outdated. This adds a bit of a learning curve to adopt and understand to get maximum value. The onboarding process for new users could be improved with better UX and more intuitive first-time use guidance. Role-based dashboards or help could be effective in enhancing the user experience. The initial setup wasn't super easy, there's a lot to configure and not everything is clear from the start, so an expert might be needed to get the most out of it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use SAP Fieldglass to manage vendor contracts, SOWs, and service procurement. This platform assists us in handling global, cross-border external vendor services efficiently. It also streamlines the management of our non-payroll workforce, covering everything from onboarding to offboarding. We utilize this software on a biweekly basis. It is user-friendly, and our integration team was able to implement it smoothly with our main SAP system. The Fieldglass support team has also been cooperative. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawbacks of this software are its pricing and complexity. New users or organizations without an IT team may find it challenging to manage on their own. Additionally, the navigation is somewhat unconventional, which can make it harder to get used to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its ability to centralize the entire contingent workforce management process in one platform. From onboarding and time tracking to extensions and offboarding, everything is streamlined with clear visibility. The compliance checks and automated approval workflows significantly reduce manual errors and ensure alignment with company policies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, SAP Fieldglass can feel a bit complex and not very intuitive for new users, which leads to a learning curve. Some processes, like navigating approvals or making corrections, could be more user-friendly. Occasional system delays and limited customization in reporting are also areas where improvements would add value. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What stands out the most is the level of visibility it provides into external workforce spending. It allows organizations to better control costs, optimize vendor usage, and align workforce decisions with financial goals. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

From a technical perspective, integrations and customizations can be challenging and time-consuming, particularly when aligning it with other enterprise systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the centralization of processes and the real-time view in SAP Fieldglass. I also appreciate the clear report generation it offers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the interface can feel slow and not very smooth. It would be very helpful if SAP Fieldglass had faster loading times. The initial setup was very complex as we needed to define workflows, permissions, and approval rules. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about SAP Fieldglass is how easy it makes it to manage external workers. Everything - from creating job postings to tracking timesheets and payments - happens in one place. It reduces follow-ups, speeds up approvals, and gives clear visibility of who is working, their costs, and the overall status. It just makes the whole vendor and contractor management process very smooth and organised. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about SAP Fieldglass is that the interface can feel a bit outdated and not very user-friendly at times. Some actions take multiple clicks, and navigating between screens isn’t always smooth. Also, small configuration issues can slow down tasks, and new users usually need time to get comfortable with it. Overall, it works well, but the user experience could definitely be more modern and intuitive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SAP Fieldglass is being implemented to replace disparate procurement systems, as well as numerous misaligned systems distracting from commonality of data enabling value assessments and appropriateness. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Again, the interface and usage requires training and experience given the complexity of inputs required. There are often misaligned requirements across different departments requiring further experience with unique requirements interfaces. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.