Red Hat Enterprise Linux Pricing Overview

1. Much more secure than windows operating system.

2. Performance is best as compare to any other operating system even if we allocate minimum required resources like cpu ram etc

3. Used in almost every organisation to host most of the mission critical applications as rhel providers performance, security and free to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. GUI interface is not that user friendly as compare to windows.

2. Creating repository removes the packages dependency and installing packages without subscription is difficult.

3. If audit happens removing vulnerabilities and updating packages without subscription is so much difficult.

4. Making changes in the /etc configuration files and restarting any service as per need when selinux is in enforcing state is difficult.

5. Allowing ports and services when firewall is in on state is difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RHEL provides consistent performance, predictable updates, and long-term support, which makes it ideal for production workloads. The built-in SELinux policies, lifecycle management, and seamless integration with tools like Ansible make system administration much easier and far more secure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Red Hat Enterprise Linux is that some features and repositories require a subscription to access, which can increase costs for smaller teams. Additionally, certain advanced configurations can be complex for beginners, especially when dealing with SELinux or dependency issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.