This is an excellent framework for building comprehensive automated test suites. It allows you to integrate Web UI tests, Desktop UI tests, and other types of interactions through C# libraries, all within a single tool. Additionally, it helps manage test structure, promotes code reusability, and simplifies the maintenance of UI object paths. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Because of the high cost of corporate licensing and pricing, Ranorex experience is sometimes undervalued by companies that prefer to promote other test automation frameworks, such as the familiar Selenium. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the user interface and the speed in which I can create a recording Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Object recognition can be slow and troublesome Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ranorex provides one of the best automation tools for recording and playback WPF C# desk top application. Its advantage is its ability to add code, in C#, where other automation tool gets stuck. That was the reason why I chose Ranorex to be our core automation development tool. Ranorex still has few problems that need to be solved and that is the place where the customer support takes place, and they do great job. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ranorex user code still use C# 4.8 while we develop on C# 11. From time to time, we see that the "Ranorex Spy" loses an element Xpath and it must be recognized again. Ranorex must find a way to add AI abilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ranorex Studio is very clearly structured and easy to use. The studio can be used for various tasks. I find Ranorex Spy particularly helpful as it makes finding important properties easier. The Ranorex libraries can also be implemented in VS, which is very helpful for writing and creating TA tests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The tool does not immediately appear as the first search result, but with slightly more targeted search terms, it can be easily found. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It ticks all the boxes in terms of features for UI automation in our .NET application. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The speed, the way data sources/data bindings are designed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have been using Ranorex for a Java-written desktop application for several years and have mostly had good experiences. Particularly noteworthy is the ability to integrate custom user code in C#. This allows practically all requirements to be implemented, making Ranorex extremely versatile. The integration with our SQL database also works smoothly. Test data can be easily integrated and used. The modular structure allows for the reuse of code and recording modules, and test cases as well as test suites can be well constructed and comfortably linked with the test data from the database through data binding.

The reporting is overall very clear and provides the relevant information in a well-prepared form. Also very helpful is the Ranorex Spy, which allows UI elements to be reliably identified. Overall, Ranorex offers comfortable, clear work and represents a very powerful test automation tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are only a few points that are disturbing in everyday use. The Ranorex Spy occasionally shows instabilities and can even cause Ranorex to crash in rare cases. This problem can be mitigated by clicking save in Ranorex Studio before using the Spy, so no data is lost. However, it is still somewhat annoying.

Another minor weakness concerns the reporting: For very long test cases that last an hour or more, the PDF creation of the report no longer works reliably. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have transferred all our UI-side test automation to Ranorex. Ranonrex offered more possibilities to build test automation. The structuring options are also very good. Additionally, if a function is not offered by default, you can achieve the goal with custom code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Initially, there were several hurdles, especially with the infrastructural integration into virtual machines. However, it eventually worked out, and the support was helpful and punctual. We also had to build up intensive expertise in using Ranorex before the application could be easily operated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I particularly appreciate the numerous validation options as well as the recording mode. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The application keeps crashing, especially in validation mode. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When switching from another automation tool, the quite affordable price is noticeable. Getting familiar with it is quite intuitive. The support has been perfect and very helpful so far. The tutorials and help available online (in English) are extensive and understandable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The fact that Ranorex is only available in English was initially disappointing. Small font. Lack of options to change default settings. Not reliably usable in combination with some open programs (MS-Teams). For mobile tests, the application must be uninstalled from the device and installed with an installation file. Personally, I miss shortcuts that would usually make work easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ranorex is easy to use and supports desktop, web and mobile applications. We were looking to upgrade our desktop application, and our existing automation tool won't support the windows components. Thankfully we landed on Ranorex and it worked like a charm. Their customer support is also very responsive and helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ranorex Test execution performance could be a bit better Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.