# Which Veterinary Practice Management Platforms Have the Best Reviews for Ease of Adoption With Non-Technical Teams

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Front desk staff and vet techs don't always come in with a technical background, so I looked at which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/veterinary-practice-management">veterinary practice management software</a> actually has reviews backing up an easy learning curve for non-technical teams.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/covetrus-avimark/reviews"><strong>Covetrus Avimark</strong></a> (4.1 stars, 88 reviews): this is the most consistent one in reviews. Multiple reviewers describe an easy learning curve and call it simple for new hires to pick up, with one practice specifically noting how quickly new staff get trained up on it. The main gap mentioned is that pulling custom reports still requires contacting support.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/navetor/reviews"><strong>NaVetor</strong></a> (4.4 stars, 13 reviews): reviewers frequently mention hands-on onboarding support that walks new users through setup step by step, which several credit for getting them ready on opening day. The recurring dislike is that a few specific setup steps, like generating certain certificates, aren't as intuitive as the rest of the platform.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cornerstone-practice-management/reviews"><strong>Cornerstone Practice Management</strong></a> (3.8 stars, 63 reviews): worth including as an alternative, though the evidence here is more mixed. Some reviewers call it easy to use for a multi-manager practice, while others describe a real learning curve at first, with a couple noting it only clicks after getting past that initial adjustment period.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Given how non-technical staff actually experience onboarding, would a shorter learning curve on day one outweigh a platform with more built-in functionality that takes longer to master?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For non-technical veterinary teams, day-one usability matters, but only if the platform still supports the workflows the practice will need six months later. I’d compare time-to-competency for front desk and tech staff, onboarding quality, and how often routine tasks still require support once the team is fully live.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4