Ranorex Studio Pricing

Get a Custom Quote

Name	Price	Features
Premium Floating License	$5,990per concurrent user	perpetual license Ranorex Studio, including Ranorex Recorder, Ranorex Spy, Ranorex API, and more. Shared license (1 concurrent user) to create automated tests for all technologies: desktop, web, and mobile devices. Virtual machines and terminal server environments 12 months maintenance & professional support
Runtime License	$890per additional physical or virtual device	perpetual license Enables test execution on physical and virtual devices that do not have Ranorex Studio installed Add to a premium license to run tests on additional physical and virtual machines. Required to use the Ranorex remote agent Contact Ranorex for information on potential volume discounts.

Ranorex Studio pricing & plans

Free Trial is available

Pricing information for Ranorex Studio is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase Ranorex Studio must be conducted with the seller.

Pricing information was last updated on March 09, 2020

Ranorex Studio Alternatives Pricing

The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other Test Automation Software

Sauce Labs Live Testing - Virtual Machines	$19/mo. Unlimited Users	Unlimited live testing minutes and instant access to thousands of browser/OS combos and mobile emulators & simulators 1 Concurrent Session Unlimited Live Testing Minutes Secure, Single-use VMs Debugging Tools Videos & Screenshots of Tests Secure Local Tunneling REST API Access Show More
Perfecto Automated Desktop Web	$300/month	Test your web apps with ease on dedicated VMs and Macs in the Perfecto Cloud. Dedicated Windows VMs and Macs Unlimited Live & Automated Testing 2-10 Parallel Test Executions Test Reporting & Analytics Perfecto Connect Security Unparalleled Test Execution Speed/Performance Open & Integrated with Leading Automation and Execution Frameworks Show More
Telerik Test Studio Test Studio Web & Desktop	$2,499Perpetual	Automated testing for Web and Desktop, Visual Studio plugin Automated Web and Desktop Testing Visual Studio Plugin Manual Testing Exploratory Testing Functional UI Testing Test Scheduling and Execution Parallel Test Execution on Multiple Machines Continuous Integration Support Product Updates - 12 Months Priority Support Floating License Show More

Various alternatives pricing & plans

Free Trial is available

Pricing information for the above various Ranorex Studio alternatives is supplied by the respective software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase any of these products must be conducted with the seller.

Ranorex Studio Pricing-Related Review

Dhammika G

Software Developer - Analysis Office

Computer Software

Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)

Validated Reviewer

Verified Current User

Review source: Invitation from the seller

Sep 27, 2018

"Great to work with Rx Studio and Spy"

What do you like best?

Studio compatible with Visual Studio and team foundation server, Capabilities of Spy tool, keyword based approach, features for data driven testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike?

Spy startup takes time (lazy loading is suggested)

3rd party control related issues (specially with tree controls and tree items)

Issues with cells in Excel due to caching Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

For complex scenarios, coding (C# or VB) is necessary Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

Cost and time saving in integration and functional testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Show Less

Helpful?

Add Comment

fletch w

SVP - Sustaining Engineering

Computer Software

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

Validated Reviewer

Verified Current User

Review source: Invitation from G2

Jan 20, 2017

"Ranorex Test Automation Platform"

What do you like best?

Ranorex is a fairly powerful test automation platform, particularly given it's price point. Compared to other tools I've used (QTP\Quality Center, TestComplete, Selenium), there are many benefits out-of-the-box other than price:

- reporting libraries

- support for multiple browsers and devices

- more robust IDE and debugging capabilities

- native .NET, so no need to use archaic scripting languages or to learn new ones

- for us, being presented via native .NET libraries means we can actually forego the Ranorex IDE (built upon SharpDevelop) and perform all development within Visual Studio. The benefits of this include

-- native .NET compiling and debugging - better than sharpDevelop's and far better than QTP\Selenium

-- easy integration with tools we already use: TeamCity, SVN, nCover

-- QA and development use the same tools... can share projects, code, resources Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike?

UPDATE APRIL 2017:

With the v7 release, Ranorex now supports running automated tests against the EDGE browser. However, if (like us) you counted on their native support for Visual Studio, and have developed your framework within Visual Studio rather than the Ranorex IDE, you've been left out in the cold. Ranorex has chosen to keep their WebDriver integration private, meaning that people who are referencing Ranorex libraries with Visual Studio still have no way to run tests against the EDGE browser. According to their Forum and User Voice sites, there is no plan to change this. Good news is that Telerik DOES support Edge, so for those of you in our shoes it may be possible to migrate...

=========

Limited third party integration. We can roll it ourselves, but out of the box integrations don't meet our needs most of the time.

Foreign product - which isn't bad (and there is a COE in Florida). However, the user base seems small compared to other vendor's offerings. This isn't mush of a problem generally, but when you need answers fast it can be a drawback

Not a lot of information about how to use... API is documented virtually without examples. Advanced usage information practically non-existant

License manager is slow to release licenses locked to clients that have completed work... Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

APRIL 2017 UPDATE - IF YOU PLAN ON TESTING AGAINST THE EDGE BROWSER, STICK TO RANOREX'S IDE. IT ISN'T NEARLY AS FLEXIBLE AS VISUAL STUDIO AND ITS DEBUG PERFORMANCE IS FAIRLY POOR, BUT EDGE TESTING IS ONLY SUPPORTED IF YOU USE THEIR IDE.

=====

If I had to do it again, I think that I'd have us stick the Ranorex IDE. It isn't as powerful as Visual Studio in terms of debugging, but there are a lot of features built into the "system" which many folks would probably want to take advantage of, such as visual test ordering\re-ordering, the new remote deploy and run functionality, multiple test drivers available natively, at the test case level...

If going the route we followed - into Visual Studio - spend a little upfront time building a robust test runner. We ended up putting together a nice test driver, but it works on the local machine level. Bringing it back out the the network can save a few headaches... Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

well, obviously test automation. After performing a POC with the Ranorex IDE itself, we were able to move to Visual Studio (reference Ranorex core libraries) and build a fairly robust test framework pretty quickly.

We are able to run thousands of tests against various app configurations and on various OSes pretty easily

We've done some POC work with mobile device testing and are reasonably satisfied with what we've learned, at least for Android devices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Show Less

Helpful?

Add Comment