With Prisma Access , we can leverage advantage of connecting remote users to organization network with maximum security and with less latency which can be managed by on premises or cloud managed Panorama device.
Palo alto with great technology gives us simplicity in managing those remote users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike?
In order to configure everything require to invest in Panorama , so sometime customer budget goes high than expected .
Service connections are limited to 3 only which can be increase. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Organization those who have Palo Alto as perimeter device , can consider Prisma Access for their Remote workers , instead of investing in other solutions Prisma Access gives you better option which can onboard very easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
So before Prisma Access , we require to have maximum bandwidth and device capability in order to handle SSL connection from Remote Users , which causing single point of failure and device administrator need to maintain network up and running .
Also while connecting to office resources , user needs to connect to Perimeter device and from there they can access respective resources. With in same country users can managed this , but what about users who are far long ? For those users Prisma is become as perfect solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.