What do you like best about MetricStream Enterprise Risk Management?
The positive features are the very structured application where things need to be organised.
Risk levels must be clearly defined, aswell as issues which is good.
Detailed information on action plans cann be written Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about MetricStream Enterprise Risk Management?
Windows for improvements (ERM version):
- make it dynamic: it is not a brainstroming tool, the tool cannot be used for risk workshops or for a quick desktop risk assessment task
- disturbing for experienced users, risk paractioners, risk managers with a strong track record in risk management, risk workshops or risk assessments. design not aligend with practice in the real life.
- the full spectrum of a risk scenario containing e.g. the risk, issue, action plans, inherent and residual risk rating and comments, etc. on one single page cannot be displayed but switching from one( limited) view to another: not practical, time consuming for reaching the information we want to check
- appli contains many "locks" by default (or design?)
- many bugs and time for solving can be an issue
- the (very) structured tool (positive points) does not facilitate the management of the information (and the change), handling information and navigating through the app is painfull sometime when a large amount of information is to be registered.
- reporting system with tables (issue registers, action plan registers, etc.) always tricky to tailor and manage.
- specific comments that may need to support risk information cannot be processed and the tool is not designed for maintaining a visible comment sections when working with the issue form or action plan form.
- some functionalities difficult to use Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.