Leapfrog Geo Reviews & Product Details

I'm almost exclusively use Leapfrog Geo for my job, I've had to train junior geologist on how to use it; what I enjoy the most about it is how intuitive the software is, once the user understands the basics of the software they can pretty much use it by themselves. Another thing is the available help and training online, I feel like leapfrog is one of the few software where the help bottom actually helps you understand all the possibilities with that tool and the online courses are phenomenal. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The base leapfrog geo program is not as open as other software on integrations and compatibly, some times it feels like some processes can be a little over complicated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Leapfrog geo is an extremely intuitive and powerful software. Its ability to utilize various forms of geological data and put it at your finger tips to both implicitly and explicitly model with ease is amazing. I have almost never had a crash and the fact it saves your projects as you go without fail is a life saver. The support offered by Seequent is also top tier when i have questions or issues. It is also my go to tool for DDH database QAQC. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Though most of its tools are excellent, its section making features are a bit rigid and lacking. allowing more customization on what is displayed on a section or how title blocks are designed would be nice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

An implicit modeling engine facilitates the fast generation of complex geological surfaces, based on a large number of drillhole data. The dynamic updating mechanism instantly recalculates contact networks when new assay logs are appended to the project tree. The numerical interpolant tools create extremely accurate grade shells on complex structural domains without the need for manual Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The contact surface editor tends to freeze when using many narrow vein splays (polyline constraints). Evaluations with high density block models use up vast local hardware memory and stall secondary operations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to learn. The dynamic nature of how everything links together makes it really easy to update existing models with new data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't believe there are any downsides to using Leapfrog Geo Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s easy to import many different file formats from a variety of sources. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’m not able to get surfaces to follow the extents or boundaries of my polylines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Implicit modelling is one of the best tools for creating a geological model from mapping data. I find it really helpful for visualization, especially for small-budget mining clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The structural.data feature doesn’t have a proper, understandable way to use it. Trends are a good way to view things, but I think we need to incorporate updating structural measurements over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the modelling features, I have more experience using vulcan and deswik, but the UI on leapfrog, does make it easy to migrate learning and user friendly too. the data generation is easier to comb through and validate Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the central connectivity. linking up work between team should be a bit easier to manager in my opinion it could be a bit better Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The implicit modeling and the dynamic updating of the calculations are very useful. I also appreciate the selection options, especially the interval selection tool. The interoperability of the software is limited (no possibility to add tools for specific calculation or data transfert. Nevertheless the only thing I was able to do is to connect a database in a server via ODBC connexion . The annual price for this solution is very high with an annual increase and no possibility of negociation. I would say it is the negative aspect of this solution. On the other side, the support is very pro active, so quite positive even if sometimes the responses are very limited and short. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Low-level statistical tool for EDA (declustering?, twinholes identifications, )The model calculations take a long time and are tied to a specific table. If that table is removed, the 3D model is deleted as well. We're we can just replace the table and recalculate the model without having to re create the model Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our raw measurements of the structure generate accurate mineralized models using the contact surface generator. Even complex fault block movements are automatically taken care of by the volumetric interpolation tools during active drilling. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The explicit wireframing workspace breaks if a large number of overlapping grade shells are used. Large block model evaluations when performing a critical rendering drop are attributed to the local machine memory requirements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like how the user interface is very easy to use and intuitive. It helps me a lot with doing structural interpretations and visualizing datasets, making it really easy to look at different models. The ease of making cross sections and different interpolations for block models is something I really appreciate. The interface makes it very easy to achieve this without having to read all the documentation. The keyboard shortcuts and everything just make it very easy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd like to have a bit more options when making structural trends, like changing the colors and legends. It could be easier for data handling too, instead of having to do everything on Excel and import/export. It'd be nice to change data in the tables directly in Leapfrog Geo. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.