What I like most about Frizzle is that it turns handwritten student work into useful grading insights without asking students to change how they work. The step-level feedback and misconception tracking are especially valuable because they highlight exactly where a student went wrong, instead of simply marking an answer incorrect. It can save a lot of time when reviewing an entire class, while still leaving the teacher in control of the final assessment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The biggest limitation for me is that the AI sometimes needs a second look, especially when the handwriting isn’t clear or when a response is more complex than a straightforward answer. I also feel the feedback and grading controls could be a bit more flexible to better fit different teaching styles. Overall, it’s still a useful tool, but I wouldn’t rely on the AI output without reviewing it first. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
