Last updated: Nov 04, 2026
| Time to go live | Relative frequency |
|---|---|
| Under 1 month | Most frequently reported |
| Under 1 day | Also reported |
| 1–3 months | Also reported |
| 3–6 months | Reported less often |
| 6–12 months | Reported less often |
Multiple boards one task, UI experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Modal task, very slow, filter not useful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like that Favro streamlines not only tasks/ responsibilities into one platform but allows for a cohesive archive of all notes, communication, docs, and other relevant information into a user-friendly platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
N/A - It is so easy to customize each card in Favro. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
* Easy to use and customizable UI. It is very intuitive to navigate, especially when compared to other project management tools.
* Multiple boards within a single collection. Think of it as boards within boards. It may not sound like a game-changing feature, but it is.
* Realtime updates to boards and cards when there are multiple people collaborating on them. It works similarly to Google Docs when collaborating on a single card. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
* Poor integration with JIRA. Some teams rely on JIRA to get their work done, and Favro does not play nicely with it.
* Cannot apply templates to newly created cards (templates can only be assigned to an entire board).
* Rich formatting tools could be a bit better, especially for tables within cards. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Favro is very fast to set up and the pre made templates mean you can get started instantly. Favro has the ability to import existing projects from an Excel workbook which was very useful. Visually, Favro gives a very clear and simple breakdown of tasks to be completed in whichever view you use, although we favoured the kanban. The best part of the Favro experience was the support from the Favro team who have great product knowledge and are very responsive to emails. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It can take time to explore the many automations available, but these are easy to use once explained. Notifications can be slow to come through and it is hard to see where 'mentions' are when using the app. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The ability to create a solid workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
At this time I am not finding issues with how the software functions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Hi there! Dovidas, product expert @ Favro here. Thank you for your review.
We hope to improve our features, you can share your thoughts on our Canny page below.
See how Favro improvedui and custumising options and drag and drop Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
complexity but i haven't used long enought to get better at it Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Easy integration with google docs, google calendar and that every user can easily change the view mode (kanban, sheets) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It's not something wrong, but to get more powerful reports you have to pay even more for the license. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Hi there! Dovidas, product expert @ Favro here. Thank you for your review.
We hope to improve our report features, you can share your thoughts on our Canny page below.
See how Favro improvedI personally like the customization, we have a many boards, and they seem to all be set up differently, and each team has their own custom process for what works well. The custom views per user are important too, I use Sheet view the most, it helps me, as a Scrum Master, keep an eye on the sprints, and add total Story Points and Timesheets easily, while others on my team will exclusively use Card view because they find it the most useful for their purposes. Nesting cards within the backlog has become important as we create Epics with broken down cards within those Epics - new functionality that brings the main card over to the backlog has been convenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We've run into a number of bugs on our boards which are frustrating. Our Cumulative charts display incorrectly, our Story Point Totals functionality in each lane inconsistently displays totals from specific columns instead of the total for the whole lane. Another challenge we run into a lot, when we convert a checkbox entry in a card, to a new card, we usually want to also link that card where it originated - it's become a bit of a tedious practice to, convert to a card, and attach the card. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There are a lot of things to love about this software. I'll list a few;
- As Simple or Complex as you need | The interface itself is lovely. If you're used to tools like Trello and feeling like you need just a bit more, this is it. You can get the simplicity of Trello with the capability of being as complex as you need. It's more than just boards, there are many types of planning "structures" you can work with.
- Incredible Design Team | The team has been working *with* it's users to provide a unique and streamlined planning tool.
- Automations | You can AUTOMATE things, yes! It's very nifty too, allowing you to not only automate when things happen *inside* the editor, but you can hook up to their API and use Webhooks as well!
- Templates | Self-explanatory Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There isn't much to complain about honestly. When you do have a complaint, most of the time when you reach out to the team they're already working on it or are open to making changes. (I've had many implemented just from suggesting a feature, it's kind of wild to see a team this engaged actually.)
I will say though, I'd like to see improvements on the desktop/mobile version, and a dark-mode. The web application works very smooth, but the other two could definitely use improvements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Favro is easy to use and very customizable. I have used it in two companies (software and hardware development) and it is adaptable to the organization. It is also easy to maintain thereby integrating well within my day-to-day workflow. I like that the views adapt quickly to anyone's workflow and help visualize the information so quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I do not like some of the formatting within cards (bullets & tables can be frustrating to get right). I end up linking to Google Sheets or Docs sometimes instead.
Some of the templates seem to be focused heavily on software development (we do hardware also) and so we end up defaulting to a basic Kanban style and building it from there. It works for us, but I think we are missing out compared to the built in templates. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.
is there a functionality to review all the cards marked as done?
Is it possible for me to give seperate edit/view rights to different types of users?
Pricing provided by Favro.
