# What is the best desktop image optimization software for designers who need to reduce file size before delivery without the output looking noticeably compressed?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Honest answer, this category is almost all web tools and plugins rather than installed desktop software, so a true offline app is hard to find here. What designers actually seem to use for the compress-before-delivery step is a handful of quick web tools that keep quality intact, and these are the ones I'd reach for:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tinypng/reviews"><strong>TinyPNG</strong></a>: The one I'd point most designers to. Reviewers, working graphic designers among them, use it to shrink images before uploading or handing them off, batch-compress several at once, and say the quality stays basically the same. It runs in the browser with a Figma integration rather than as a heavy desktop client.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/resizeimage/reviews"><strong>ResizeImage</strong></a>: Another one designers reach for at the pre-delivery step, a graphic designer describes resizing and compressing right in the browser before sharing files with clients, no account needed. Watch for ads, and there's limited control over export quality.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/compress2go/reviews"><strong>Compress2Go</strong></a>: More general-purpose, but handy when you just need to shrink a file before sending it, reviewers like being able to balance size against quality per file, again with no install.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The catch across all three is they're browser-based, not a true offline desktop app. If installing something local is a hard requirement, none of these fit and you'd be looking outside this category. For designers, has a quick web tool been enough before delivery, or do you still want something that runs locally?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Honest flag first: this category is mostly cloud/API image services (Cloudinary, ImageKit, Kraken.io) rather than true desktop apps, worth knowing before evaluating.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Format choice does more than compression level for most delivery work. A flat graphic with text stays crisp in PNG at a smaller size than a photo ever will in JPEG, so choosing per asset beats one export preset applied to everything.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Something that matters more than which compressor you pick: how many times the file has already been saved. A JPEG that was exported, emailed, re-saved by someone in Preview and exported again has artifacts baked into the pixels, so any further compression is compressing the artifacts alongside the image, which is why the same tool looks invisible on one file and mushy on the next. Compress once, from the original export, and TinyPNG&#39;s reputation for keeping quality basically unchanged holds up well. The batch side is the other half of why it gets recommended so consistently, since &quot;once per file&quot; is much easier to enforce when the whole handoff folder goes through in a single pass.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

A quick web tool covers the delivery step fine, but the reason some designers still insist on local is client confidentiality: unreleased work shouldn&#39;t pass through a third-party compressor at all. If that&#39;s not a constraint, batch web tools plus a disciplined export preset get you 95 percent of the way. The local-tool holdouts I know keep one command-line utility around for the occasional huge batch and use web tools for everything else.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4