--- title: Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Reviews meta_title: 'Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 217 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.3 review_count: 217 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-11-11' parent_category: name: Vulnerability Management url: https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-management ---

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Reviews & Product Details

Profile Status

This profile is currently managed by Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) but has limited features.

Are you part of the Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) team? Upgrade your plan to enhance your branding and engage with visitors to your profile!

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

3 months

Return on Investment

22 months

User Insights

Average based on 217 real user reviews.

Implementation Time

3 months

Perceived Cost

$$$$$

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Reviews FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: Nov 04, 2026

What is Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), and what problem is it built to solve?

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) brings vulnerability information from different sources into a shared view of organizational risk. Teams use it to prioritize remediation and focus attention on the vulnerabilities and assets that matter most.

What languages does Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) support?

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) supports 1 language: English.

What company sizes and industries is Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) the best fit for?

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) appears most often in larger organizations, with use also represented in mid-market and small businesses. The industries with the strongest presence include technology and financial services.

How long does it take to implement Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) across a team?

Implementation is most commonly reported to take 1–3 months, though the time can vary with the environment and setup.

What customer support options does Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) provide, and how do users find the overall support experience?

The support experience is mixed: users describe helpful, responsive assistance, while others report slow responses or difficulty getting technical issues resolved. Support-related feedback also includes praise for help with setup and product guidance.

What features or capabilities could make Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) even more useful?

A few improvements could make Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) more efficient to use, especially for teams handling large or complex environments.
  • More customizable reports and exports, including clearer ways to tailor report content for different teams.
  • Simpler search and filtering, with easier query building and more intuitive navigation.
  • Faster data refreshes and clearer historical views of asset and vulnerability changes.
  • Broader, more reliable integrations and smoother data ingestion from connected tools.

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Reviews (217)

View 1 Video Reviews
Reviews

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Reviews (217)

View 1 Video Reviews
4.3
217 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
IC
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Very useful for security"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

It shows easily the vulnerabilities in my system, so I can take actions really quick Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

Sometimes I need to research what to do. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Leisure, Travel & Tourism
UL
Verified User in Leisure, Travel & Tourism
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Kenna Security Review"
3.5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

It makes the process of identifying which vulnerabilities to focus remediation efforts on very easy through their tailored risk rating score. As it also displays known fixes, it makes the process of involving relevant stakeholders and communicating what steps need to be taken, very efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

There is a certain lack of attention to feature requests that would greatly benefit the platform. Their documentation is also slightly outdated, however, they are fast responding to updating it when issues are brought to their attention. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

MS
Moumita S.
Security Consultant
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.
"Comprehensive tool for enterprise vulnerability management"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

The vulnerability management module which has the risk score metrics is well aligned to what the company is trying to achieve with regard to the triaging of their security vulnerability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

The application security side of the Kenna house is still in maturity level 1 with connectors not working as expected. Given the advanced modelling of the VM module would have liked the app sec side to be aligned to the industry standards as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Recreational Facilities and Services
UR
Verified User in Recreational Facilities and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"false positive"
3.5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

Vulnerabilities are categorized in severity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

It mostly shows False positives or the vulnerabilities are already superseded and still showing as vulnerable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SM
Shi M.
software developer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Good"
4/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

Rest APIs Documentation. Kenna's Security analysis is very good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

Overall UI and usability. I wish if they could improve rest apis further, more automation and integration friendly Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
AI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Good interface, great integrations."
4/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

I do like the interface and the enrichment features it has over other vulnerability systems. It factors in things like CVE, CVSS, etc, but if it's not external facing, it adjusts the score down and takes other factors into account. That's really nice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

Little bit of a learning curve and some setup work to get the connectors/integrations working, but other than that, it's a pretty slick system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Broadcast Media
UB
Verified User in Broadcast Media
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Consistent Monitoring"
4/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

Consistency in monitoring is extremely important. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

Need to be able to drop old vulnerabilities quicker & easier when they are no longer being detected. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SG
Sumalya G.
S
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Data Modelling of the Vulnerability side"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

I like the vulnerability side of the house for Kenna as it has good filters, and the data modeling is pretty well built, especially about the mapping it does with the source and target attributes. The filters make life very easy for people trying to get a feel of their risk meter. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

There is a lot of improvements that need to be made for the app sec side of Kenna. There are hardly any filters to visualize the data, and the data modeling is incorrect. The connectors don't work as expected. So there is a lot of corrections that need to be made for this module. I'm not too fond of the app sec module. If we can have the data modeling of app sec as the vulnerability side of the house that would be great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rahul S.
RS
Rahul S.
Sr. Engineer- Software Development
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Kenna feature review"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

I like the comprehensive dashboard, which gives a detailed report of all the features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

I just started using it and still experimenting with its different features, and till now, I have liked everything. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CK
Claudia K.
Manager, Cisco Contact Center Operations
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Ain't Nobody Got Time for That!"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

As a company, we used to use spreadsheet and sharepoint methods to handle our threat detection and remediation processes. Moving to Kenna was beneficial in so many ways: 1. we ditched the awful spreadsheets and annoying sharepoint web forms, 2. we had a fast and efficient way to filter and only see our department's devices and their threat ratings. 3. I love that I can flip from tab to tab to see specific and actionable information on what needs to be done to remediate and cuts down on my team having to research the CVE and how to address it. Needless to say I spend less time now than I did before on these tasks but feel a whole lot more secure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)?

Recently my Asset filter list is replete with tags and is making it hard for me to just see my departmental tags, this is an inconvenience and not a deal breaker. I will need to see how to make sure mine appear at the top of the asset filter tag list. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Questions about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)? Ask real users or explore answers from the community

Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

GU
Guest User

What is Kenna Security used for?

0 Upvotes
0
Join the conversation
Mohamed Jad A.
MA
Mohamed Jad Amraoui
•
Last activity about 5 years ago

How does score Algorithm works and how accurate is it ? Can it push fixes remotely ? it will make it easier for admins

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

3 months

Return on Investment

22 months

Average Discount

15%

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Comparisons
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Features
Automated Remediation
Workflow Automation
Security Testing
Vulnerability Scanning
Vulnerability Intelligence
Contextual Data
Risk Scoring
Reporting
Risk-Prioritization