Link copied to clipboard

# Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Tenable Vulnerability Management Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/tenable-vulnerability-management/export.csv)

Cisco Vulnerability...Tenable Vulnerability...[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
3 months

Based on 6 responses

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**
3 months

Based on 10 responses

Return on Investment

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
22 months

Based on 26 responses

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**
15 months7 months sooner

Based on 10 responses

Perceived Cost

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
$$$$$

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
15%4% more

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**
11%

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
Not enough data

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**
[
Ease of Use (8)
](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1478065&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Scanning Efficiency (8)
](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1479501&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Expensive (4)
](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1478767&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Inadequate Reporting (4)
](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1479014&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

Integrations

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
Not enough data

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_dda1fe9b8262073dcd5ec86bb9006586/axonius.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Axonius

](https://www.g2.com/products/axonius/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b2231a414cb9f3f7c194f65af32b723e/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance.png "Product Avatar Image")

Cloudflare Application...

](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_26ac860943c9b2850d696d43be267d0c/crowdstrike-falcon-cloud-security.png "Product Avatar Image")

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud...

](https://www.g2.com/products/crowdstrike-falcon-cloud-security/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_56db399f44b6fabb7c667f09bc770579/crowdstrike-falcon-endpoint-protection-platform.png "Product Avatar Image")

CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint...

](https://www.g2.com/products/crowdstrike-falcon-endpoint-protection-platform/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/integrations)

Screenshots

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
 ![Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/122977/Kenna.VM-Home-Page.png)

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**
 ![Tenable Vulnerability Management screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/149547/Dashboard-Vulnerability-Management-for-Modern-Assets.png)

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.6

8.6158

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**

9.0

9.0108

Ease of Use

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.5

8.5161

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**

9.0

9.0111

Ease of Setup

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.4

8.473

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**

8.9

8.995

Ease of Admin

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.4

8.475

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**

8.8

8.888

Quality of Support

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.7

8.7137

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**

8.3

8.3105

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.9

8.974

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**

8.8

8.887

Product Direction (% positive)

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.7

8.7150

**Tenable Vulnerability Management**

9.1

9.1107

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management[Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.2

143

8.5

90

Risk Analysis

Risk Scoring

9.0(tied score)

128

9.0(tied score)

64

Reporting

8.5(won by 0.5)

127

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

8.0

70

Risk-Prioritization

9.1(won by 0.1)

124

9.0

70

Vulnerability Assesment

Vulnerability Scanning

8.4

118

9.5(won by 1.1)

76

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Vulnerability Intelligence

8.7

126

9.1(won by 0.4)

64

Contextual Data

8.3

126

8.8(won by 0.5)

56

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Dashboards

8.5(won by 0.4)

126

8.1

65

Automation

Automated Remediation

7.3

92

7.8(won by 0.5)

52

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Workflow Automation

7.5

91

7.9(won by 0.4)

49

Security Testing

7.7

94

8.1(won by 0.4)

52

Test Automation

7.6

87

8.2(won by 0.6)

57

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Vulnerability Scanner[Hide 58 FeaturesShow 58 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

8.5

64

Performance

Issue Tracking

Not enough data

8.5(won by default)

49

|

Verified

Detection Rate

Not enough data

9.1(won by default)

53

|

Verified

False Positives

Not enough data

7.2(won by default)

53

|

Verified

Automated Scans

Not enough data

9.3(won by default)

57

|

Verified

Anomaly/Malware Detection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Network

Compliance Testing

Not enough data

8.4(won by default)

48

|

Verified

Perimeter Scanning

Not enough data

8.8(won by default)

47

Configuration Monitoring

Not enough data

8.8(won by default)

43

|

Verified

Vulnerability Scanning

Not enough data

9.8(won by default)

7

Source-Code Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Web Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Application

Static Code Analysis

Not enough data

7.5(won by default)

34

Black Box Testing

Not enough data

Feature Not Available

Risk Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

Manual Application Testing

Not enough data

Feature Not Available

Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner

Autonomous Task Execution

Not enough data

7.8(won by default)

6

Proactive Assistance

Not enough data

7.8(won by default)

6

Additional Functionality

SSL Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

HIPAA Compliant

Not enough data

Not enough data

API

Not enough data

Not enough data

Threat Response

Not enough data

Not enough data

Endpoint Protection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Maintenance Scheduling

Not enough data

Not enough data

Third-Party Integrations

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Auditing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Application Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Encryption

Not enough data

Not enough data

Network Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Reporting

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Reporting/Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Authentication

Not enough data

Not enough data

Financial Data Protection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Anti Virus

Not enough data

Not enough data

Secure Data Storage

Not enough data

Not enough data

Virus Definition Update

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Dashboard

Not enough data

Not enough data

VPN

Not enough data

Not enough data

Audit Trail

Not enough data

Not enough data

Anti Spam

Not enough data

Not enough data

Access Controls/Permissions

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Visualization

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Escalation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Runtime Container Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Asset Discovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Threat Intelligence

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Protection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability/Threat Prioritization

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

SQL Injections

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Threat Protection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Web-Application Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Password Protection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Website Crawling

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

ServiceNow Store Apps[Hide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

8.5

8

ServiceNow Apps

ServiceNow Integration

Not enough data

8.3(won by default)

7

Value

Not enough data

8.3(won by default)

7

Agentic AI - ServiceNow Store Apps

Autonomous Task Execution

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-step Planning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Cross-system Integration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Proactive Assistance

Not enough data

Not enough data

Show 1 feature category with incomplete data

Vulnerability Management[Hide 36 FeaturesShow 36 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Additional Functionality

Search/Filter

Not enough data

Not enough data

Risk Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Compliance Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Third-Party Integrations

Not enough data

Not enough data

Certificate Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

API

Not enough data

Not enough data

Incident Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Automated Containment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Data

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Monitoring

Not enough data

Not enough data

Policy Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Asset Discovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Penetration Testing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Runtime Container Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Dashboard

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Auditing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Issue Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Threat Intelligence

Not enough data

Not enough data

Patch Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Endpoint Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Collaboration Tools

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Goal Setting/Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Asset Tagging

Not enough data

Not enough data

Assessment Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Access Controls/Permissions

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability/Threat Prioritization

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Protection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Risk Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Reporting/Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

SQL Injections

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_522b7c020f205bc7a58f4cf24758aed7/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm.jpg "Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)")](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews)

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

6.5%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

17.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

76.5%

[![Tenable Vulnerability Management](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/127e03b7d601741c15306f07b0f8cf84/tenable-vulnerability-management.svg "Tenable Vulnerability Management")](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews)

Tenable Vulnerability Management

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

16.1%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

31.5%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

52.4%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

6.5%

16.1%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

17.0%

31.5%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

76.5%

52.4%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_522b7c020f205bc7a58f4cf24758aed7/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm.jpg "Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)")](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Information Technology and Services

22.0%

Financial Services

12.0%

Retail

8.0%

Computer & Network Security

7.5%

Computer Software

6.5%

Other

44.0%

[![Tenable Vulnerability Management](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/127e03b7d601741c15306f07b0f8cf84/tenable-vulnerability-management.svg "Tenable Vulnerability Management")](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews)
Tenable Vulnerability Management

Financial Services

13.8%

Information Technology and Services

13.8%

Computer & Network Security

10.9%

Banking

5.8%

Computer Software

5.1%

Other

50.7%

FAQs

## Cisco Vulnerability... vs Tenable Vulnerability... FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between Cisco Vulnerability... vs Tenable Vulnerability...?

Tenable Vulnerability Management stands out for its higher G2 rating and slightly better Ease of Setup, while Cisco Vulnerability Management is noted for its strong support and risk-based prioritization features.

| [Cisco Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews) | [Tenable Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.3/5 (217 reviews) | 4.5/5 (126 reviews) |
| Enterprise | Enterprise |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| 8.7 | 8.0 |
| Risk-based prioritization and strong support | Ease of use and scanning efficiency |

### How do the pricing models of Cisco Vulnerability... and Tenable Vulnerability... compare?

Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated higher for value, with a stronger Price/Cost satisfaction score than Cisco Vulnerability Management.

- **Cisco Vulnerability Management:** In recent reviews, several buyers mention concerns about high pricing and limited flexibility for organizations with budget constraints.
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers frequently cite the product as expensive, but also highlight its strong cost-benefit ratio and satisfaction with the value provided.

### What are the best alternatives to Cisco Vulnerability... and Tenable Vulnerability...?

The top three alternatives to Cisco Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management are InsightVM (Nexpose), Wiz, and Nucleus.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Cisco Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews) | 4.3/5 (217 reviews) | Enterprise | High pricing concerns | Risk-based prioritization and strong support |
| [Tenable Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews) | 4.5/5 (126 reviews) | Enterprise | Expensive but strong cost-benefit | Ease of use and scanning efficiency |
| [InsightVM (Nexpose)](https://www.g2.com/products/insightvm-nexpose/reviews) | 4.4/5 (79 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) | 4.7/5 (844 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Nucleus](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews) | 4.5/5 (32 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |

### Which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management features should I prioritize when comparing Cisco Vulnerability... and Tenable Vulnerability...?

Buyers should prioritize risk-based prioritization, ease of use, reporting, integration capabilities, and cost-benefit when comparing Cisco Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.

- **Risk-based prioritization:** Cisco Vulnerability Management is frequently cited for its risk-based approach; Tenable Vulnerability Management is noted for its Vulnerability Priority Rating (VPR) and risk-based prioritization.
- **Ease of use:** Cisco Vulnerability Management: 8.5; Tenable Vulnerability Management: 8.9 (Tenable leads by 0.4 points).
- **Reporting:** Reporting features are a recurring theme for both products, with Tenable Vulnerability Management having 4 all-time mentions for reporting features and Cisco Vulnerability Management frequently cited for reporting and dashboards.
- **Integration capabilities:** Both products are cited for integration capabilities, with Tenable Vulnerability Management having 3 all-time mentions for integration capabilities.
- **Cost-benefit:** Tenable Vulnerability Management is noted for its strong cost-benefit ratio, while Cisco Vulnerability Management receives feedback about high pricing.

### What are the pros and cons of Cisco Vulnerability... vs Tenable Vulnerability...?

Cisco Vulnerability Management's headline strength is risk-based prioritization, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is recognized for ease of use and scanning efficiency.

- **Cisco Vulnerability Management strengths:** Risk-based prioritization, strong support, clear dashboards, and actionable remediation guidance.
- **Cisco Vulnerability Management trade-offs:** High pricing, limited flexibility for budget-constrained organizations, and some challenges with report customization and integration setup.
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management strengths:** Ease of use (8 all-time mentions), scanning efficiency (8), automated scanning (5), asset management (4), reporting features (4), and strong cost-benefit ratio.
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management trade-offs:** Expensive (4 all-time mentions), reporting limitations (4), complexity (3), and some concerns about false positives and support responsiveness.

### Is Cisco Vulnerability... or Tenable Vulnerability... better for small businesses?

Neither Cisco Vulnerability Management nor Tenable Vulnerability Management is primarily focused on small businesses, as both have Enterprise as their largest reviewer segment.

- **Cisco Vulnerability Management:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers note high pricing as a challenge for smaller organizations.
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers mention the product can be costly for smaller businesses but highlight its strong cost-benefit ratio.

### Which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management platform has better integrations?

Reviewers cite parity between Cisco Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management for integrations, with both products supporting integration capabilities.

- **Cisco Vulnerability Management:** Recent reviews mention integration with Cisco XDR and API integration, with positive sentiment around integration capabilities.
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Integration capabilities are cited in 3 all-time mentions, with reviewers highlighting integration with ServiceNow and Active Directory.

### How do Cisco Vulnerability... and Tenable Vulnerability... compare on customer support?

Cisco Vulnerability Management scores higher on Quality of Support (8.7 vs 8.0), a difference of 0.7 points, making it the stronger choice for support according to G2 reviewers.

- **Cisco Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers consistently praise responsive support, though some mention delays for complex issues and challenges with customized solutions.
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive and immediate, but some note slow responses for feature requests and occasional challenges with account management.

### Which is easier to implement, Cisco Vulnerability... or Tenable Vulnerability...?

Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated higher for Ease of Setup (8.7 vs 8.4), a difference of 0.3 points, indicating a smoother implementation experience.

- **Cisco Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers describe the setup as straightforward but note a learning curve and the need for proper onboarding to unlock full potential.
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers highlight very simple and intuitive implementation, with several noting setup and integrations can be completed in a day.

### Which product has better Reporting?

Tenable Vulnerability Management is favored for Reporting, with more frequent reviewer mentions and strong reporting features.

- **Cisco Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers frequently cite reporting and dashboards as strengths, but some mention challenges with report customization and user-friendliness.
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Reporting features are cited in 4 all-time mentions, with reviewers highlighting robust, informative, and flexible reporting capabilities, though some note limitations in customization.

Alternatives

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Alternatives**

 ![InsightVM (Nexpose)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1d6a2407e149c3d13d93bc4b09b076d6/insightvm-nexpose.svg "InsightVM (Nexpose)")

[
InsightVM (Nexpose)
](/products/insightvm-nexpose/reviews)

 ![Nucleus](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/4f736a33f154423b66d7d98e5d0d7bfe/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus.svg "Nucleus")

[
Nucleus
](/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews)

 ![Brinqa](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e509d02a002cc556a1ad3d93d3f8c5be/brinqa.svg "Brinqa")

[
Brinqa
](/products/brinqa/reviews)

 ![Qualys VMDR](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8f9c479b207589ba8dc7777f344ab0ac/qualys-vmdr.png "Qualys VMDR")

[
Qualys VMDR
](/products/qualys-vmdr/reviews)

**Tenable Vulnerability Management Alternatives**

 ![InsightVM (Nexpose)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1d6a2407e149c3d13d93bc4b09b076d6/insightvm-nexpose.svg "InsightVM (Nexpose)")

[
InsightVM (Nexpose)
](/products/insightvm-nexpose/reviews)

 ![Wiz](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/991dbad301661dc9e1b78a7e252252b4/wiz-wiz.svg "Wiz")

[
Wiz
](/products/wiz-wiz/reviews)

 ![Qualys VMDR](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8f9c479b207589ba8dc7777f344ab0ac/qualys-vmdr.png "Qualys VMDR")

[
Qualys VMDR
](/products/qualys-vmdr/reviews)

 ![Intruder](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1539808658/intruder.svg "Intruder")

[
Intruder
](/products/intruder/reviews)

## Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Tenable Vulnerability Management easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) overall.

- Reviewers felt that Tenable Vulnerability Management meets the needs of their business better than Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM).
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Tenable Vulnerability Management over Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM).