Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Tenable Vulnerability Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (58.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Star Rating
(217)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)Tenable Vulnerability Management
Star Rating
(121)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (58.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tenable Vulnerability ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cisco Vulnerability Management excels in risk scoring with a rating of 9.0, which reviewers mention provides a comprehensive view of vulnerabilities, allowing teams to prioritize effectively. In contrast, Tenable Vulnerability Management has a slightly lower risk scoring rating of 8.8, which some users feel may not offer the same depth in prioritization.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco's automated scans are highly rated at 9.2, with users appreciating the efficiency and thoroughness of the scanning process. On the other hand, Tenable's vulnerability scanning is rated even higher at 9.3, with users noting its effectiveness in identifying vulnerabilities across various environments.
- G2 users highlight that Cisco Vulnerability Management has a strong quality of support rating at 8.7, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Conversely, Tenable's support rating is lower at 7.9, with some users expressing concerns about response times and the depth of support provided.
- Users on G2 report that Cisco's risk prioritization feature shines with a rating of 9.1, allowing teams to focus on the most critical vulnerabilities first. In comparison, Tenable's risk prioritization is rated at 8.8, which some users feel lacks the same level of granularity in prioritizing risks.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco's ease of use is rated at 8.5, with many finding the interface intuitive and user-friendly. However, Tenable scores higher at 8.9, with users praising its streamlined navigation and overall user experience.
- Users say that Cisco's vulnerability intelligence feature is rated at 8.7, providing valuable insights into vulnerabilities. In contrast, Tenable's vulnerability intelligence is rated higher at 9.1, with reviewers noting its extensive database and timely updates that enhance threat awareness.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
No pricing availableTenable Vulnerability Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Free Trial is available
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
158
8.9
82
Ease of Use
8.5
161
8.9
84
Ease of Setup
8.4
73
8.8
68
Ease of Admin
8.4
75
8.7
66
Quality of Support
8.7
137
8.1
80
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
74
8.6
66
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
150
8.9
85
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
8.4
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
48
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.1
48
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.3
48
|
Verified
Network
Not enough data
8.5
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
43
Not enough data
8.7
40
|
Verified
Application
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
33
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Risk Analysis
9.0
128
8.9
58
8.5
127
8.1
59
9.1
124
8.8
58
Vulnerability Assesment
8.4
118
9.4
59
8.7
126
9.2
57
8.3
126
8.7
54
8.5
126
8.2
57
Automation
7.3
92
7.7
49
7.5
91
7.8
47
7.7
94
8.1
51
7.6
87
8.1
52
ServiceNow Apps
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Agentic AI - ServiceNow Store Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Tenable Vulnerability Management are categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) has no unique categories
Tenable Vulnerability Management is categorized as Vulnerability Scanner and ServiceNow Store Apps
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.0%
Financial Services
12.0%
Retail
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.5%
Computer Software
6.5%
Other
44.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.5%
Financial Services
13.5%
Computer & Network Security
9.0%
Banking
6.3%
Computer Software
5.4%
Other
52.3%
Discussions
Is there a way to sort by most recently changed asset scores?
1 Comment
SM
"Hi Matt. You are correct. You cannot sort directly on the last time that an asset score changed, but remember that Kenna is designed to pull you out of the...Read more
Training - is there training that I can take to be more efficient with this tool?
1 Comment
SM
Joe - Excellent question. Customers have the option to engage with their assigned CX team, and for those customers who have elected to have a lower touch...Read more
What is the best way to onboard new user/hire to leverage the Kenna tool to its fullest ?
1 Comment
SM
Andy - thanks for reaching out with this question. Customers have the option to engage with the Kenna CX team and related resources. We have developed an...Read more
Please advice on best practices for utilizing API to tie to visualization dashboards such as Power BI, Qlick, or Tableau
1 Comment
G2
TableRead more
What is tenable io?
1 Comment
CK
Tenable.io is user-friendly front end for Nessus scanners that provides a digestible view of all of the data the scanner is picking up. It allows you to...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
