--- title: Cisco Secure Access Reviews meta_title: 'Cisco Secure Access Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 97 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Cisco Secure Access works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.3 review_count: 97 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-11-14' parent_category: name: Cloud Security url: https://www.g2.com/categories/cloud-security ---

Cisco Secure Access Reviews & Product Details

Profile Status

This profile is currently managed by Cisco Secure Access but has limited features.

Are you part of the Cisco Secure Access team? Upgrade your plan to enhance your branding and engage with visitors to your profile!

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

2 months

Return on Investment

9 months

User Insights

Average based on 97 real user reviews.

Implementation Time

2 months

Cisco Secure Access Reviews (97)

Reviews

Cisco Secure Access Reviews (97)

4.3
97 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
IRANNA S.
IS
IRANNA S.
Senior Software Engineer
Computer Software
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 9/15/2026
"Unified Security Stack That Simplifies IT Operations and Boosts Visibility"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

Unified security stack: All SSE components are included under one license and managed through a single console.

Ease of IT operations: AI‑assisted policy creation, combined with one cloud‑managed console, helps streamline day‑to‑day administration.

Hybrid workforce support: Seamless access whether I’m in the office, at home, or working remotely.

Strong threat intelligence: Talos delivers unmatched speed for CVE detection.

Visibility & control: Shadow IT detection, application discovery, and risk scoring provide clearer oversight and stronger control. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

Migration complexity: Moving from Umbrella or ASA VPN can be complicated, and the transition may take roughly 60–90 days.

Dual dashboards: It still requires separate management consoles for Secure Access and Catalyst SD‑WAN, which increases administrative overhead.

Pricing: Subscription costs vary based on user count and the advanced features you choose, and it can end up costing more than some competitors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Krishna S.
KS
Krishna S.
Financial Sales Manager
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Originally submitted 9/15/2026
"Cisco Secure Access Makes Remote Work Simple and Secure"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

What I like most about Cisco Secure Access is that it provides a secure and reliable way to access company resources from anywhere. It is easy to use, offers strong security, and helps protect users and company data without making the connection feel complicated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

One thing I find a little challenging is that some settings and features can take time to understand, especially for new users. Occasionally, troubleshooting or resolving connection issues can also be a bit confusing. Overall, the experience is good, but making the interface and troubleshooting process simpler would make it even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vikram Laxman Yadav v.
VV
Vikram Laxman Yadav v.
Deputy Manager QA
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Cisco ACI: Intent-Based Workload Isolation with Whitelist Security"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

Workload isolation in a Cisco ACI replaces traditional, static VLAN/ACL boundaries with an intent-based, whitelist security model enforced directly on the leaf switch ASIC. Traffic visualization is dropped by default unless an explicit contract permits it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

Actually no any chance to dislike the Cisco ACI. Mostly Cisco is the best platform, and Workload isolation in a Cisco ACI replaces traditional, static VLAN/ACL boundaries with an intent-based, whitelist security model enforced directly on the leaf switch ASIC. Traffic visualization is dropped by default unless an explicit contract permits it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dhiraj K.
DK
Dhiraj K.
Senior Software Engineer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 9/15/2026
"Secure and Reliable Access for Hybrid Workforces"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

What I appreciate about Cisco Secure Access is that it brings together a lot of security features in one place. You get secure web access, zero-trust capabilities, and cloud security without having to juggle separate tools. It also feels centralized and straightforward to manage, with smooth integration into Cisco’s ecosystem and established policies that help protect different users across different locations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

One thing I don’t particularly appreciate is that Cisco Secure Access can feel complicated for people who are just getting started with setup and configuration, especially for organizations that are new to the Cisco security system. Certain policies and integrations can be hard to understand at first, and it may take time to work through the learning curve, troubleshoot issues, and get everything working as expected. In addition, the price may not feel affordable for many small businesses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lateefah B.
LB
Lateefah B.
Recruitment Coordinator in Global Recruitment, HR
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"User-Friendly with Strong Security but Session Timeout Frustrates"
4/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

I like that Cisco Secure Access is user friendly and the customer service is on point. I can get in contact with support quickly if anything goes wrong. I also love that the blockers we set up really work, which means our personal and confidential information stays secure. It helps us work in an orderly fashion without issues, knowing that Cisco Secure Access limits fraud or scams that could happen in other organizations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

Sometimes, when we're logged in for maybe five minutes, it logs us out. This is something that could be changed, like allowing us to be logged in a little bit longer. If we step away from our desk for five minutes, we come back and we're logged out. That's something that could be fixed as well. It becomes very useless to keep doing the single sign-on, especially when we're in meetings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ted B.
TB
Ted B.
Growth and Strategy
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Ensures Compliance, Easy Setup, Needs Front-End Improvement"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

I like how Cisco Secure Access embeds smoothly into our workflow. The remote access feature is particularly valuable since our staff often work from home or at hotel sites for clinical trials, which allows us to maintain the commitments we make in our RFPs. The central log for incidents or threat logs is also handy—it simplifies the process of investigating incidents within our workflow. Additionally, the initial setup was straightforward, which is essential for us when defining user functionalities and access into our AWS environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

I think there might be a better front end for setting up DNS security and malware inspection. I'm not an expert, so maybe it makes more sense to the experts, but it's confusing to me. It's an important part to stop phishing and malicious downloads, so it should be easier. I also feel that there could be an improvement in creating awareness about how people could potentially bypass the system, which would help us show additional compliance to our sponsors and improve our chances to win more bids. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Shrinkhala S.
SS
Shrinkhala S.
Deputy General Manager
Management Consulting
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Dependable Security with Cost-Effective Flexibility"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

I find Cisco Secure Access to be one of the most reliable native security solutions I've used. It's very cost-affordable, which is great for our organization. Their IT team is incredibly agile and knowledgeable, resolving our issues swiftly through email and chat, usually within twenty-four hours. I appreciate their dependability as a vendor, as we've consistently received a lot of positive feedback. The pricing has been stable with no increases over the past two years, which I really value. The zero trust security access feature is crucial for securing our servers and allowing remote teams to manage work efficiently. The compatibility is impressive, especially given the challenges of integrating with government systems. Cisco's team managed to convince and work seamlessly with government clients, which speaks volumes about their capabilities. The software's performance is dependable, with no downtime even on weekends. Their proactive R&D team anticipates security threats and provides advanced security solutions at competitive prices, which feels like a major advantage for us. Overall, their team is a strong pillar behind the consistent quality and reliability we experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

I really wish Cisco Secure Access would offer a longer trial period. They currently provide only a 30-day trial with limited features, and I feel that's just not enough time to truly explore and understand their complete security offerings. Because sometimes it just takes more time to see how everything works and ensure that the security measures cover the entire system properly. I'd suggest they extend the trial to 60 days and maybe even offer some solutions free of cost initially, especially for smaller and medium-sized organizations that can't invest everything upfront at once. Also, we've occasionally faced integration hiccups where systems just don't seem to communicate the way they should. It'd be awesome if Cisco engaged more with government clients to understand their need for flexibility. That would really help streamline things because these clients can be quite resistant to changing how they do things. Lastly, while their chat support is great and all, having 24/7 phone support for instant resolution would be a big win. Sometimes you just need that immediate help that chat or email can't always provide. So these areas could use a little boost to make the whole experience even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pablo Antonio G.
PG
Pablo Antonio G.
Profesor
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Seamless VPN/SWG Steering with Powerful Built-In Observability"
5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

Cisco Secure Access solves this cleanly through two key design choices: Seamless VPN & VPNaaS Coexistence: Using the established Cisco Secure Client (formerly AnyConnect), it dynamically directs web/SaaS traffic through its Secure Web Gateway (SWG) while routing private application traffic via zero-trust (ZTNA) connectors or traditional IPsec/SSL tunnels—without the end-user having to think about where an app lives. Integrated Observability: Incorporating ThousandEyes endpoint agents directly into the SSE framework is a huge operational advantage. When a remote user experiences lag on a SaaS application, IT can immediately pinpoint whether the bottleneck is the user's Wi-Fi, the ISP, the SSE cloud edge, or the SaaS provider itself. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

While Cisco Secure Access is a strong platform, engineers, IT administrators, and security teams frequently cite several key pain points: Platform Maturity & Legacy Baggage: Cisco built Secure Access by stitching together distinct products—Umbrella, AnyConnect, Duo, and Viptela. While unifying them under a single cloud platform is the end goal, the user interface and administrative workflows can still feel disjointed. Policy configuration menus are notoriously clunky compared to native cloud-first rivals like Zscaler or Netskope. Resource-Intensive SSL Decryption: Inspecting encrypted web traffic (TLS/SSL decryption) is vital for modern Secure Web Gateways (SWG), but enabling deep SSL inspection on Cisco Secure Access has caused unpredictable latency spikes and performance drops for some organizations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Heather W.
HW
Heather W.
Assistant Sales Manager
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Makes secure access easier without overcomplicating things"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

What I like most is that it gives us a secure way to access what we need without making the process feel overly complicated. Once everything is set up, it mostly works in the background, which is exactly what I want from a security product. I don’t want to have to think about security every time I’m trying to get something done. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

The initial setup and learning where everything is can take a little time, especially if you’re not someone who works in IT every day. There are a lot of features, so some of it can feel like more than you need at first. Once you get used to it, though, the day-to-day experience is pretty straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cy M.
CM
Cy M.
Quality Assurance Specialist
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Unified Platform with Impressive Security Features"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Cisco Secure Access?

I like Cisco Secure Access for helping me monitor performance and network latency from user endpoints. It helps manage the security of my networks without switching clients, which is really convenient. I appreciate the unified platform because I can see everything in a single operational interface and use a unified agent. The platform's agentic nature and features allow me to centralize policy enforcement. I'm also fond of the remote browser isolation as well as the GenAI guardrails and access control. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Cisco Secure Access?

The UI could use a little bit of updating and sometimes I get overwhelmed at the number of settings that I can actually edit. Just a cleaner, more modern look would be great. As far as the settings go, sometimes the ThousandEyes Experience Insights give me a little bit too much information, and I'd like to have that streamlined. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Questions about Cisco Secure Access? Ask real users or explore answers from the community

Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

Himansu P.
HP
Himansu Panda
•
Last activity 7 days ago

Cisco Secure Access: how do you balance smart routing and ZTNA with licensing complexity?

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

2 months

Return on Investment

9 months

Average Discount

12%

Cisco Secure Access Features
Adaptive Access Control
User Monitoring
Secure Web Gateway (SWG)
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
Network Segmentation
Security Analytics
API/Integrations