--- title: Checkmarx Reviews meta_title: 'Checkmarx Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 49 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Checkmarx works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.2 review_count: 49 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-10-08' parent_category: name: "DevSecOps\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t" url: https://www.g2.com/categories/devsecops ---

Checkmarx Pros and Cons: Top Advantages and Disadvantages

Quick AI Summary Based on G2 Reviews

Generated from real user reviews

Users value the easy implementation of Checkmarx into existing repositories, enhancing their security review processes effortlessly. (2 mentions)
Users praise the intuitive user interface of Checkmarx, making security reviews and integrations straightforward and user-friendly. (2 mentions)
Users value the accuracy of results in Checkmarx, finding it effective for automated security reviews. (1 mentions)
Users appreciate the automation testing capabilities of Checkmarx, making security reviews efficient and user-friendly. (1 mentions)
Users praise the responsive customer support of Checkmarx, consistently providing help when challenges arise. (1 mentions)
Users experience a significant number of false positives with Checkmarx, particularly for Kotlin projects, leading to frustration. (1 mentions)
Users face challenges with limited support for Kotlin, experiencing many false positives compared to other languages like Java or Javascript. (1 mentions)
Users experience missing features in Checkmarx, particularly with Kotlin support, leading to numerous false positives. (1 mentions)
Users find the navigation poor in Checkmarx, citing issues with dashboard layout and display clarity. (1 mentions)

Top Pros or Advantages of Checkmarx

Top Cons or Disadvantages of Checkmarx

Aman M.
AM
Aman M.
Senior DevOps Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Centralized Source Code Security with Seamless CI/CD Integration"
5/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

Checkmarx is a centralized security tool that provides end-to-end insights into source code security and vulnerabilities. It also helps improve the efficiency of the source code by highlighting the associated risks and suggesting ways to remediate the vulnerabilities. In addition, it shows vulnerabilities in the open-source libraries and packages we use in our source code through SCA scans.

One thing I like the most is how well it integrates with our CI/CD tooling. We can plug it into our DevSecOps CI/CD flow, and developers can see scan insights directly from the pipeline itself, without needing to log in to the Checkmarx UI separately. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

It should better cope with modern software development lifecycles and provide end-to-end support for scanning any valid file extensions. For example, we are migrating from Node JS to TypeScript, and as part of that change we updated our .js files to use the .mjs extension. However, Checkmarx still does not support scanning .mjs files. We reported this issue to them about a year ago, but even now it remains unsupported. The current suggestion is to rename .mjs files to .js when uploading code for Checkmarx scans, which is not a practical workaround for us. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Aman, thank you for the feedback. We understand the challenges that can arise when development teams adopt new languages, frameworks, and file types.

Checkmarx has recently expanded its language-agnostic scanning capabilities through a new hybrid scanning engine that combines deterministic analysis with AI-powered detection, enabling broader coverage across modern and emerging technologies, including AI-generated code and polyglot environments. This approach is designed to reduce gaps created by evolving development practices while maintaining high-fidelity results.

We appreciate you highlighting the .mjs support issue, and feedback like this helps us continue improving coverage and compatibility for modern software development workflows. Please reach out to us if you would like to discuss more, and again thank you for the feedback!

See how Checkmarx improved
Roushan J.
RJ
Roushan J.
Application Security Consultant
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Effective SAST with Minimal false Positives"
4/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

I use Checkmarx for SAST code review, and it helps me identify security vulnerabilities early in the software development lifecycle, saving a lot of money by catching them in the code for each commit. I really like how it identifies security vulnerabilities, especially getting rid of common OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities like SQL injection and Cross-Site Scripting. I'm impressed that it can also detect business logic vulnerabilities, such as unauthorized access control, earlier in the development process. I also appreciate that it reports IDOR vulnerabilities from the OWASP top 10. The initial setup was easy, and I switched to Checkmarx from Fortify mainly because it provides less noise from false positives and offers deeper coverage of the OWASP top 10. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

Some of false positive seems painful sometimes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Thank you for the thoughtful review, and for choosing Checkmarx after moving from Fortify.

We hear you on false positives. We are excited to let you know that we have made real progress on this this issue for our customers.

Our Next Gen SAST paired with Checkmarx Fusion merges a deterministic detection engine and an AI reasoning engine. We have measured an F1 score of 0.74, with 60–70% fewer false positives than standalone AI scanning.

Our Chief Product Officer Jonathan Rende lays it out in this blog, check it out. We would be happy to connect and show you a demo. Thank you for being a Checkmarx customer!

See how Checkmarx improved
Poorna Srinivasa Rao T.
PT
Poorna Srinivasa Rao T.
Senior Consultant
Computer & Network Security
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Poorna's Checkmarx Review"
5/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

Checkmarx is a solid application security tool that helps identify security vulnerabilities throughout the software development lifecycle, including with its AI features. Its ability to alert developers to application flaws even before the code moves to production is especially appreciable. The UI is easy to navigate and delivers fast performance, and its ability to integrate with multiple repos and CI/CD pipelines is great. Although the pricing is a bit higher, it still feels worth it. Support is fair enough. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

It tends to generate more noise, and even items that are negligible still get flagged. The scan speed is a bit slow compared to other tools in the market, but it does deliver on results. Pricing also feels a bit on the higher side. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Poorna, thank you for your thoughtful review and we are glad that you appreciate our ability to alert developers to reviews even before code moves to production. That's our goal: to make security embedded in the whole process so developers don't have to worry about it and can focus on creating.

Regarding your feedback: reducing noise is actually an area where Checkmarx has invested heavily. Recent innovations like Checkmarx Fusion validate findings across multiple detection engines to reduce false positives, while Triage Assist prioritizes vulnerabilities based on real attackability, reachability, and exploitability.

Our customers are seeing results. I am sharing a video of one customer who appreciated our ability to identify false positives and give developers the chance to review before merging. Check it out, and please reach out to us with any other questions. We are happy to set up a demo session.

See how Checkmarx improved
Nitesh A.
NA
Nitesh A.
Module Lead - Stellantis (formerly PSA Group) - Automotive
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Automated Checkmarx Scans Keep Us Ahead of Key Vulnerabilities"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

Provision to automate scan runs is now available. Scan results are well structured and comments are well documented. Easy for developers to understand and fix. Can be integrated with stakeholder reports. Good UI and support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

Scan results on Salesforce security portal are different from checkmarx portal which cause issues during package submission to Salesforce. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Thank you for the feedback Nitesh! We understand that differences between scan results from Salesforce Security Portal scans and Checkmarx scans can be challenging when comparing findings across tools. To address this, Checkmarx has recently introduced a new hybrid scanning engine and Finding Analysis Engine designed to improve scan fidelity and consistency by validating findings, reducing noise, and surfacing the vulnerabilities that matter most.

The result is an industry-leading F1 score and a 60% reduction in false positives, helping teams gain greater confidence in their scan results and prioritize remediation more effectively.

We're also glad to hear that Checkmarx is delivering fast scans, actionable vulnerability insights, intuitive workflows, and strong support for your team.

Let us know how we can continue to support your team, reach out any time and again, thank you for your review!

See how Checkmarx improved
NT
Naushad T.
Lead Technical Specialist - EDR
Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Checkmarx: Reliable SAST Solution for Strengthening Application Security"
4/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

I had a positive experience using Checkmarx as part of our application security process. What I appreciated most was how it helped us identify security vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle, so teams could address issues before they reached production. The interface is fairly friendly once you're familiar with it, and the scan reports provide enough detail for developers and security teams to understand the root cause and recommended remediation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

The initial setup and policy configuration come with a learning phase, especially for teams that are new to application security testing. In addition, full scans can take a while on large or complex projects, which can slow down development pipelines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Thanks Naushad for your review. Glad to hear you are identifying vulnerabilities early in the life cycle. Our research has found that the cost to fix one if it is missed through the stages (through IDE, CI/DC, supply chain, and run time) can multiply as much as 10 times in each stage. To your issues with setup and speed, these are two areas we are working on. Our latest Risk Orchestration feature centralizes scanning results in a more user-friendly way, and our just released hybrid NG-SAST security scanning engine achieved an F1 score of 0.64 – more than three times the 0.20 average across competing approaches that Checkmarx evaluated.

Thank you for your review, and I invite you to learn more!

See how Checkmarx improved
Amshu P.
AP
Amshu P.
Discord Testers
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Powerful for Security, But Needs UI Improvements"
4/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

I like Checkmarx for its security testing at the application level. It's practical even though it wasn't really easy to use at first. I appreciate its security capabilities, easy navigation, and the reporting which works pretty well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

It was really tough for me to use initially, felt kinda confusing but got used to it as I started working with it. UI could be better. Scans take a lot of time and I used to get false positives, which required so much energy ugh. I stopped using it because the cost was too high for my boss and he stopped paying for it. Tough, it took like, days for the team to properly set it up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Amshu, sorry you stopped using Checkmarx due to cost, it would be great to explore this further so you can get the maximum benefit of our platform.

Also with regards to usability, one area where Checkmarx has made significant investments is Risk Orchestration within Checkmarx One ASPM, which provides a single, unified view of findings across SAST, SCA, IaC, APIs, containers, secrets, cloud, and third-party tools. By correlating and prioritizing risks based on exploitability, reachability, and business impact, teams spend less time navigating multiple dashboards and manually triaging findings.

This approach reduces alert noise, eliminates redundant triage, and gives developers actionable remediation guidance directly within their existing workflows, helping make application security easier to adopt, faster to manage, and more cost-effective at scale.

Again, thanks for your review, and we would appreciate the chance to find out how we can make our experience a better investment for you. Reach out any time!

See how Checkmarx improved
Arya S.
AS
Arya S.
Cybersecurity Lead
Computer & Network Security
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Comprehensive Application Security with Checkmarx"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

I like Checkmarx because it provides comprehensive application security, with accurate vulnerability detection, risk-based prioritization, and clear remediation recommendations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

One area that could be improved is the number of false positives generated during scans, as this can add extra time to validation and triage. In addition, scans may take longer when running against large codebases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Arya, thank you for the thoughtful feedback! We’re glad Checkmarx is helping you find risk earlier across source code, open source, APIs, and other application components. We also understand that false positives and scan time can add friction for developers.

That’s why Checkmarx One is investing heavily in higher-fidelity scanning, not just more findings. Our new hybrid SAST engine combines deterministic analysis, purpose-tuned AI, and a Finding Analysis Engine to confirm true positives and suppress false ones before results reach developers.

In head-to-head testing across seven production codebases, it achieved a 0.64 F1 score, more than 3x the evaluated average, while reducing false positives by 60%. The goal is to help teams cut through noise, prioritize genuinely exploitable risk, and remediate faster without slowing delivery.

See how Checkmarx improved
Verified User in Banking
AB
Verified User in Banking
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Practical Security Testing for Development Teams"
4/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

What I like most about Checkmarx is that it helps us think about security earlier in the development process instead of discovering issues later when they are more difficult to fix. It has made conversations between the security and development teams much more productive and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

One area where Checkmarx could improve is the amount of effort sometimes needed to review and prioritize findings, especially in larger projects. While the information is useful, it can take time to determine which issues should be addressed first. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

We appreciate your review!

Prioritization of findings in the enterprise is definitely something we have improved. I recently talked to two customers who pointed out that our Risk Orchestration in Checkmarx One ASPM can help with this.

RO pulls in findings across areas like SAST, SCA, IaC, API security, secrets, containers, DAST, plus third-party signals, and then creates a unified risk score/view so teams can focus on what matters most. Please reach out and we will demo it for you, checkmarx.com/product/aspm

See how Checkmarx improved
Verified User in Computer Software
EC
Verified User in Computer Software
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Strong Integrations and Support, but Pricing Is a Challenge for LatAm Startups"
3.5/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

For us the most importante is the number of integrations that it has, sometimes de price is a little bit hi because we are startup that is based in Latam. The support also is good, and the performance UI and UX algo good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

During the pilot test of this technology it works correct, we are evaluating due pricing because our geography Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Thanks for your review! We understand that pricing is an important consideration for growing startups, especially in LATAM, and appreciate your input as you evaluate the platform.

I invite you to consider agentic capabilities like Developer Assist, Triage Assist, and Remediation Assist to reduce manual work, prioritize real risk, and deliver contextual fixes faster. Checkmarx also saves our customers money with a hybrid AI approach that avoids relying only on expensive large LLM calls. That helps reduce token consumption and cost at scale while maintaining high-confidence results. Our goal is to help teams adopt AI coding securely, efficiently, and economically.

We would be happy to talk more, and we thank you for taking the time to tell us what you think.

See how Checkmarx improved
Tadele L.
TL
Tadele L.
Senior IS Audit Officer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Essential for Secure Development, Accurate and Efficient"
4/5
What do you like best about Checkmarx?

I like Checkmarx for its accurate vulnerability detection, easy CI/CD integration, and detailed remediation guidance that helps developers fix security issues quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Checkmarx?

Checkmarx could improve scan performance for large projects, reduce false positives, and provide a more user-friendly interface for easier navigation and reporting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Shane McLaughlin of Checkmarx

Tadele, thank you for the feedback! We've made significant investments to address these areas. Our new hybrid scanning engine combines deterministic analysis with AI-powered reasoning to deliver higher-quality results, achieving the industry's highest scanning fidelity while reducing false positives by 60%. This helps developers spend less time validating findings and more time remediating real risks.

To improve usability and reporting, Checkmarx One ASPM now includes Risk Orchestration, which provides a single, unified view of findings across security tools, reduces alert noise, and prioritizes risks based on real exploitability and business impact. This simplifies navigation, streamlines reporting, and enables faster, more efficient triage and remediation workflows.

Together, these innovations are designed to improve scan efficiency, reduce noise, and create a more intuitive experience for both developers and security teams.

We hope you check them out, and we would be happy to discuss more. Thank you for your review!

See how Checkmarx improved