# Top 10 Angular Material Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 52 Explore the best alternatives to Angular Material for users who need new software features or want to try different solutions. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Angular Material include features and projects. The best overall Angular Material alternative is Essential Studio. Other similar apps like Angular Material are Progress Kendo UI, DevExpress, Material UI, and PrimeNG. Angular Material alternatives can be found in [Component Libraries Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) but may also be in [Mobile Development Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/mobile-development-frameworks). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Angular Material - [Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/essential-studio/reviews) - [Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-kendo-ui/reviews) - [DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/products/devexpress/reviews) - [Material UI](https://www.g2.com/products/material-ui/reviews) - [PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/products/primeng/reviews) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/products/ionic-an-outsystems-company/reviews) - [Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-telerik/reviews) - [Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/products/selenium-webdriver/reviews) - [NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/products/ngx-bootstrap/reviews) - [Flutter](https://www.g2.com/products/flutter/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to Angular Material Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Angular Material stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Accounting, and Hospital & Health Care, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/essential-studio/reviews) By Syncfusion **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 802 Syncfusion® Essential Studio is a suite of components and frameworks for developing web, mobile, and desktop applications. Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, Essential Studio is: - More expensive - Easier to admin - Better at support Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-essential-studio) **Compare Essential Studio with other alternatives:** - [Essential Studio vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Essential Studio vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-essential-studio) - [Essential Studio vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-material-ui) - [Essential Studio vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-primeng) - [Essential Studio vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-ionic-an-outsystems-company) - [Essential Studio vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-progress-telerik) - [Essential Studio vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Essential Studio vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-ngx-bootstrap) - [Essential Studio vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-flutter) ### 2. [Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-kendo-ui/reviews) By Progress Software **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 257 The Most Complete UI Framework to Speed Up Your HTML/JS Development Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, Progress Kendo UI is: - More expensive - Easier to admin - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-progress-kendo-ui) **Compare Progress Kendo UI with other alternatives:** - [Progress Kendo UI vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Progress Kendo UI vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Progress Kendo UI vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Progress Kendo UI vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/primeng-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Progress Kendo UI vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Progress Kendo UI vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-kendo-ui-vs-progress-telerik) - [Progress Kendo UI vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-kendo-ui-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Progress Kendo UI vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/ngx-bootstrap-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Progress Kendo UI vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-progress-kendo-ui) ### 3. [DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/products/devexpress/reviews) By DevExpress **Average Rating:** 4.8/5 **Total Reviews:** 116 DevExpress engineers feature-complete Presentation Controls, IDE Productivity Tools, Business Application Frameworks, and Reporting / Dashboard Systems for Visual Studio, Delphi, HTML5 or iOS & Android development. Our product line includes UI components and libraries for desktop and mobile development (WinForms / WPF / WinUI / MAUI / Xamarin / VCL), the web (ASP.NET Core / Blazor / Web Forms / MVC / JavaScript: Angular, React, Vue, jQuery), Office File API, .NET Application Frameworks, ORM Tools, and End-to-End Web Testing. Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, DevExpress is: - More expensive - Easier to admin - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-devexpress) **Compare DevExpress with other alternatives:** - [DevExpress vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-essential-studio) - [DevExpress vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [DevExpress vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-material-ui) - [DevExpress vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-primeng) - [DevExpress vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-ionic-an-outsystems-company) - [DevExpress vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-progress-telerik) - [DevExpress vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [DevExpress vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-ngx-bootstrap) - [DevExpress vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-flutter) ### 4. [Material UI](https://www.g2.com/products/material-ui/reviews) By MUI **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 30 Material UI is a set of React components that implement Google's Material Design specification. Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, Material UI is: - Easier to set up - More usable - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-material-ui) **Compare Material UI with other alternatives:** - [Material UI vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-material-ui) - [Material UI vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Material UI vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-material-ui) - [Material UI vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-primeng) - [Material UI vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-material-ui) - [Material UI vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-progress-telerik) - [Material UI vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Material UI vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-ngx-bootstrap) - [Material UI vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-material-ui) ### 5. [PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/products/primeng/reviews) By Prime Faces **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 19 PrimeNG is a comprehensive suite of over 80 customizable and feature-rich UI components designed specifically for Angular applications. It empowers developers to create responsive, accessible, and visually appealing web interfaces with ease. Built on a design-agnostic infrastructure, PrimeNG offers flexibility in theming and styling, allowing seamless integration with various design systems. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Component Library: Provides a wide range of UI components, including data tables, forms, charts, and more, to cater to diverse application needs. - Theming Options: Offers a variety of pre-built themes and supports custom theming, enabling developers to align the UI with their brand identity. - Accessibility Compliance: Ensures components adhere to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0), promoting inclusivity. - Responsive Design: Components are optimized for mobile devices, ensuring a seamless user experience across different screen sizes. - Community Support: Backed by an active open-source community, providing collaboration opportunities and a voice in the project's roadmap. - Enterprise Support: Offers exceptional support services with prompt responses and the option to request enhancements or new features. - TypeScript Support: Provides top-notch support for TypeScript, enhancing development efficiency with types and tooling assistance. Primary Value and Solutions: PrimeNG addresses the challenges of developing complex, responsive, and accessible web applications by offering a robust set of UI components tailored for Angular. It simplifies the development process, reduces the time-to-market, and ensures a consistent and professional user interface. By leveraging PrimeNG, developers can focus on building application logic without the overhead of designing and coding UI components from scratch, thereby enhancing productivity and application quality. Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, PrimeNG is: - Easier to admin - More usable - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-primeng) **Compare PrimeNG with other alternatives:** - [PrimeNG vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-primeng) - [PrimeNG vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/primeng-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [PrimeNG vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-primeng) - [PrimeNG vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-primeng) - [PrimeNG vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-primeng) - [PrimeNG vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/primeng-vs-progress-telerik) - [PrimeNG vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/primeng-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [PrimeNG vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/ngx-bootstrap-vs-primeng) - [PrimeNG vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-primeng) ### 6. [Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/products/ionic-an-outsystems-company/reviews) By Ionic **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 154 Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components, gestures, and tools for building highly interactive apps. Built with Sass and optimized for AngularJS. Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, Ionic: An OutSystems Company is: - Easier to admin - Easier to do business with - More expensive Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-ionic-an-outsystems-company) **Compare Ionic: An OutSystems Company with other alternatives:** - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-ionic-an-outsystems-company) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-ionic-an-outsystems-company) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-material-ui) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-primeng) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-progress-telerik) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-ngx-bootstrap) - [Ionic: An OutSystems Company vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-ionic-an-outsystems-company) ### 7. [Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-telerik/reviews) By Progress Software **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 217 Progress Telerik provides controls and reporting for .NET Web (Blazor, ASP.NET Core, ASP.NET MVC, ASP.NET AJAX), JavaScript Web (Angular, React, Vue, jQuery), .NET Desktop (WPF, WinForms, WinUI, UWP), .NET Mobile (Xamarin, MAUI), Embedded Reporting, Automated Testing and Mocking tools. Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, Progress Telerik is: - More expensive - Easier to admin - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-progress-telerik) **Compare Progress Telerik with other alternatives:** - [Progress Telerik vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-progress-telerik) - [Progress Telerik vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-kendo-ui-vs-progress-telerik) - [Progress Telerik vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-progress-telerik) - [Progress Telerik vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-progress-telerik) - [Progress Telerik vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/primeng-vs-progress-telerik) - [Progress Telerik vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-progress-telerik) - [Progress Telerik vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-telerik-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Progress Telerik vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/ngx-bootstrap-vs-progress-telerik) - [Progress Telerik vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-progress-telerik) ### 8. [Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/products/selenium-webdriver/reviews) By Selenium **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 101 Selenium WebDriver is an open-source tool that automates web browser interactions, enabling developers and testers to simulate real user actions for web application testing. It supports multiple programming languages, including Java, Python, C#, Ruby, and JavaScript, allowing users to write test scripts in their preferred language. WebDriver interacts directly with browser drivers, facilitating cross-browser testing across platforms like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Internet Explorer. This direct communication ensures more stable and reliable tests by mimicking real user behavior without the need for a separate server installation. Key Features and Functionality: - Cross-Browser Compatibility: Enables testing across various browsers, ensuring consistent application behavior. - Multi-Language Support: Offers bindings for languages such as Java, Python, C#, Ruby, and JavaScript, providing flexibility for testers. - Direct Browser Control: Interacts with browsers through native drivers, leading to more accurate and stable tests. - Parallel Test Execution: Integrates with Selenium Grid to run tests concurrently on multiple machines, reducing execution time. - Open-Source and Community-Driven: Freely available with a robust community, ensuring continuous improvements and support. Primary Value and Problem Solved: Selenium WebDriver addresses the need for efficient, reliable, and scalable web application testing. By automating browser interactions, it reduces manual testing efforts, accelerates the testing process, and ensures applications function correctly across different browsers and platforms. Its support for multiple programming languages and integration capabilities make it a versatile choice for teams aiming to enhance their testing frameworks and deliver high-quality web applications. Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, Selenium WebDriver is: - Easier to admin - More expensive - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-selenium-webdriver) **Compare Selenium WebDriver with other alternatives:** - [Selenium WebDriver vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Selenium WebDriver vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-kendo-ui-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Selenium WebDriver vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Selenium WebDriver vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Selenium WebDriver vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/primeng-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Selenium WebDriver vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Selenium WebDriver vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-telerik-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Selenium WebDriver vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/ngx-bootstrap-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Selenium WebDriver vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-selenium-webdriver) ### 9. [NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/products/ngx-bootstrap/reviews) By Valor Software **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 12 Bootstrap components, powered by Angular Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, NGX-Bootstrap is: - More usable Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-ngx-bootstrap) **Compare NGX-Bootstrap with other alternatives:** - [NGX-Bootstrap vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-ngx-bootstrap) - [NGX-Bootstrap vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/ngx-bootstrap-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [NGX-Bootstrap vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-ngx-bootstrap) - [NGX-Bootstrap vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-ui-vs-ngx-bootstrap) - [NGX-Bootstrap vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/ngx-bootstrap-vs-primeng) - [NGX-Bootstrap vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/ionic-an-outsystems-company-vs-ngx-bootstrap) - [NGX-Bootstrap vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/ngx-bootstrap-vs-progress-telerik) - [NGX-Bootstrap vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/ngx-bootstrap-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [NGX-Bootstrap vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-ngx-bootstrap) ### 10. [Flutter](https://www.g2.com/products/flutter/reviews) By Flutter **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 72 Flutter is an open-source framework developed by Google for building natively compiled applications across multiple platforms, including mobile, web, desktop, and embedded devices, all from a single codebase. It empowers developers to create high-performance, visually appealing applications that maintain a consistent user experience across different platforms. Key Features and Functionality: - Single Codebase: Developers can write one set of code and deploy it across various platforms, significantly reducing development time and effort. - High Performance: Flutter compiles directly to native ARM or Intel machine code, ensuring fast execution and smooth performance on all devices. - Hot Reload: This feature allows developers to see the results of code changes in real-time without restarting the application, enhancing productivity and facilitating rapid iteration. - Customizable Widgets: Flutter offers a rich set of fully customizable widgets that adhere to both Material Design and Cupertino (iOS-style) guidelines, enabling the creation of visually consistent and adaptive user interfaces. - Extensive Ecosystem: With a vast array of packages and plugins, Flutter supports integration with various services and APIs, extending its functionality to meet diverse development needs. Primary Value and User Solutions: Flutter addresses the challenge of developing and maintaining separate codebases for different platforms by providing a unified framework. This approach not only accelerates the development process but also ensures consistency in app behavior and appearance across platforms. By leveraging Flutter, businesses can reduce costs, streamline workflows, and deliver high-quality applications to a broader audience efficiently. Reviewers say compared to Angular Material, Flutter is: - Easier to admin - Easier to do business with - More usable Categories in common with Angular Material: [Component Libraries](https://www.g2.com/categories/component-libraries) **Compare:** [Angular Material vs Flutter](https://www.g2.com/compare/angular-material-vs-flutter) **Compare Flutter with other alternatives:** - [Flutter vs Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/compare/essential-studio-vs-flutter) - [Flutter vs Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-progress-kendo-ui) - [Flutter vs DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/compare/devexpress-vs-flutter) - [Flutter vs Material UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-material-ui) - [Flutter vs PrimeNG](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-primeng) - [Flutter vs Ionic: An OutSystems Company](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-ionic-an-outsystems-company) - [Flutter vs Progress Telerik](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-progress-telerik) - [Flutter vs Selenium WebDriver](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-selenium-webdriver) - [Flutter vs NGX-Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/flutter-vs-ngx-bootstrap) --- ## Angular Material Alternatives FAQs ### How does Angular Material compare to Essential Studio? [Angular Material](https://www.g2.com/products/angular-material/reviews) and [Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/essential-studio/reviews) both offer comprehensive UI component libraries, but they differ in scale, user experience, and support. Angular Material has an average rating of 4.4/5 from 52 reviews, while Essential Studio holds a slightly higher average rating of 4.5/5 from 723 reviews, indicating broader user satisfaction and adoption. Essential Studio leads by 0.8 points in Ease of Admin (8.7 vs 7.9) and by 0.6 points in Better at Support (9.1 vs 8.5), reflecting stronger administrative usability and customer service. Both score equally in Ease of Setup (8.8). Users praise Angular Material for accelerating development with pre-built, accessible UI components adhering to Google's Material Design, but note challenges with customization, bundle size, and a steeper learning curve. Essential Studio is lauded for its extensive feature set, ease of use, wide variety of components, and exceptional customer support, with 43 mentions of support quality and 44 mentions of ease of use. It also offers a free community license for small businesses, enhancing accessibility. Essential Studio's documentation and frequent updates contribute to its reliability and developer productivity. Overall, Essential Studio provides a more versatile and supported solution, especially for enterprise-grade applications requiring a broad component suite and robust backend integrations. ### What are the best alternatives to Angular Material? The best alternatives to Angular Material include [Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/essential-studio/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 723 reviews), [Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-kendo-ui/reviews) (4.4/5 stars, 254 reviews), [DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/products/devexpress/reviews) (4.8/5 stars, 116 reviews), and [Material UI](https://www.g2.com/products/material-ui/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 31 reviews). These alternatives offer broader component libraries, better support, and enhanced customization options. ### What features do alternatives offer that Angular Material does not? Angular Material lacks certain advanced components such as export to PDF and Excel features, advanced grid functionalities, and some desktop-focused UI elements like image sliders, banners, and scrollers, which are available in some alternatives. ### Which Component Libraries tools do reviewers recommend instead of Angular Material? Reviewers recommend [Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/essential-studio/reviews) for its extensive features, ease of use, and strong customer support across 723 reviews. [Progress Kendo UI](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-kendo-ui/reviews) is praised for its comprehensive UI framework, rich components, and excellent documentation in 254 reviews. [DevExpress](https://www.g2.com/products/devexpress/reviews) stands out for its feature completeness, high-quality controls, and exceptional support in 116 reviews. [Material UI](https://www.g2.com/products/material-ui/reviews) is favored for its modern React components and ease of setup in 31 reviews. These tools are recommended for developers seeking alternatives with richer features and better customization than Angular Material. ### Why do users choose Essential Studio over Angular Material? Users choose [Essential Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/essential-studio/reviews) over Angular Material primarily due to its extensive feature set and superior customer support, as evidenced by 45 mentions of features and 43 mentions of support quality. Essential Studio offers a wider variety of components (44 mentions) and better documentation (30 mentions), which facilitates faster development and easier integration across multiple frameworks and platforms. Its community license model provides free access for small businesses, making it a cost-effective choice. Users appreciate its polished UI components, regular updates, and the ability to handle complex data scenarios efficiently. The product's ease of use is highlighted in 44 reviews, and its reliability and performance are frequently noted. Additionally, Essential Studio's support responsiveness and comprehensive API documentation reduce development friction. These factors combined make Essential Studio a preferred choice for developers seeking a robust, well-supported, and feature-rich UI toolkit that accelerates development and scales well for enterprise applications, surpassing Angular Material in administrative ease and support by 0.8 and 0.6 points respectively in G2 dimension scores. ## Explore Articles - [Which MDR solutions are best for startups](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-mdr-solutions-are-best-for-startups) - [As a performance marketer, which paid search intelligence tool gives the most reliable CPC and search volume estimates that you can actually base bidding decisions on?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/as-a-performance-marketer-which-paid-search-intelligence-tool-gives-the-most-reliable-cpc-and-search-volume-estimates-that-you-can-actually-base-bidding-decisions-on) - [Which is the most trusted enterprise mobility management by IT admins at financial services firms based on user reviews?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-is-the-most-trusted-enterprise-mobility-management-by-it-admins-at-financial-services-firms-based-on-user-reviews) - [User research software comparison for software companies](https://www.g2.com/discussions/user-research-software-comparison-for-software-companies) - [MAX by AppLovin vs Unity Ads vs ironSource for a small mobile game: which app monetization platform pays out better for indie developers?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/max-by-applovin-vs-unity-ads-vs-ironsource-for-a-small-mobile-game-which-app-monetization-platform-pays-out-better-for-indie-developers) - [What's the best CDP software for small tech startups](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-cdp-software-for-small-tech-startups) ## Spotlight Categories - [SAP Store Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/sap-store) - [Social Media Listening Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/social-media-listening-tools) - [A/B Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/a-b-testing-tools)