Compare Canonical LXC and Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Canonical LXC
Star Rating
(14)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Canonical LXCRed Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
Star Rating
(15)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes EngineSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Canonical LXC excels in "Container Networking" with a score of 9.7, highlighting its robust capabilities in managing network configurations, while Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine scores slightly lower at 8.3, indicating potential limitations in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical LXC's "Ease of Admin" is rated at 9.3, suggesting a user-friendly administrative experience, whereas Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine has a lower score of 8.3, which may indicate a steeper learning curve for administrators.
- G2 users note that Canonical LXC's "Self Healing High Availability" feature is rated at 8.7, providing a reliable environment for applications, while Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine's similar capabilities are not explicitly rated, leaving some uncertainty about its performance in this critical area.
- Users on G2 highlight that Canonical LXC has a strong "Deployment" score of 8.7, which reviewers say contributes to a smoother setup process, while Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine shines with a higher score of 9.6, indicating superior deployment capabilities that may benefit larger organizations.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical LXC's "Automatic Security Updates" feature is rated at 9.0, ensuring that users feel secure with their deployments, while Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine, with a score of 8.7, may not provide the same level of confidence in automatic updates.
- Users say that Canonical LXC's "Scalability" is rated at 9.3, making it a strong choice for businesses anticipating growth, while Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine, with a score of 9.2, also offers good scalability but may not be as robust as Canonical LXC in this regard.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canonical LXC
No pricing availableRed Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
No pricing availableFree Trial
Canonical LXC
No trial information availableRed Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
13
8.6
11
Ease of Use
8.2
13
8.5
14
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
9.2
8
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
8.3
6
Quality of Support
7.8
10
8.8
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
5
8.6
6
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
12
9.0
12
Features by Category
Application Support
Not enough data
9.6
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.7
9
System Capability
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Security
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.7
9
Fleet & Lifecycle Management - Enterprise Kubernetes Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Day-2 Operations & Reliability - Enterprise Kubernetes Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity & Access Management - Enterprise Kubernetes Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Governance, Policy & Compliance - Enterprise Kubernetes Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
App Delivery & Platform Integrations - Enterprise Kubernetes Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Organization
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canonical LXC and Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine share no categories
Unique Categories
Canonical LXC is categorized as Container Management
Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine is categorized as Container Engine and Enterprise Kubernetes Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canonical LXC
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.7%
Computer Software
28.6%
Management Consulting
7.1%
Internet
7.1%
Financial Services
7.1%
Other
14.3%
Computer Software
26.7%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Banking
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Retail
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is LXC virtualization?
1 Comment
NM
It's a Operating-system-level virtualization in which the kernel of an operating system allows the existence of multiple isolated user-space instances,...Read more
Canonical LXC has no more discussions with answers
Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
