# Which AEM platforms are worth using for a remote-first company managing devices across multiple countries without relying on VPN or on-site IT presence for patches?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I was talking to someone managing endpoints across three continents, and their biggest complaint wasn’t security or tooling.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">It was timing.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Devices coming online at different hours, patch windows never lining up, VPN dependencies breaking workflows. That’s what made me start digging into which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/autonomous-endpoint-management-aem">AEM platforms</a> actually hold up in a fully remote, multi-country setup without relying on VPN or on-site IT.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A few tools seem to handle that reality better than others:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/action1/reviews"><strong>Action1</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Built around the idea that devices are rarely on the same network, so patching works without VPN or location dependency.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ninjaone/reviews"><strong>NinjaOne</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Gives teams a way to deploy updates and troubleshoot endpoints regardless of where users are working from.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/splashtop-autonomous-endpoint-management/reviews"><strong>Splashtop Autonomous Endpoint Management</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Blends remote access with endpoint control, which matters when physical access is not an option.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/atera/reviews"><strong>Atera</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Designed around distributed IT workflows, including monitoring, patching, and support across time zones.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/automox/reviews"><strong>Automox</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Cloud-native patching that does not depend on endpoints being inside a corporate network.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What I’m curious about is less about tooling and more about behavior: In remote-first environments, what actually causes failures over time: devices being offline, users delaying updates, or something else entirely?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 2


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Three continents, six time zones, and patch windows that work for one region break another. Most tools I&#39;ve looked at still seem to assume devices come online at predictable times and that&#39;s just not the reality I think.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4