# What Reference Check platforms are most trusted by Talent Acquisition Managers, based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">TA managers care about two things equally here: whether the reference actually comes back honestly, and whether the process doesn't add days to an already slow hiring cycle within <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-check">Reference Check software</a>.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>Xref</strong>, <strong>HiPeople</strong>, and <strong>Zinc</strong> came up the most. Here's the fuller list:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/xref-xref/reviews"><strong>Xref</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.6 stars across 503 reviews, its suspicious activity detection algorithm flags unusual reference behavior automatically, with a 60% talent pool opt-in rate among candidates.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/hipeople/reviews"><strong>HiPeople</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.6 stars across 1,067 reviews, the largest sample here, its AI-enhanced reference checks include fraud detection with turnaround under 24 hours.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zinc-work/reviews"><strong>Zinc</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.7 stars across 183 reviews, the highest rating, automates document collection and follow-ups across 190 supported countries with direct HMRC integration.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/victig-background-checks/reviews"><strong>VICTIG Background Checks</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.7 stars across 514 reviews, combines reference verification with broader background screening under FCRA compliance.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/hireright/reviews"><strong>HireRight</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 3.9 stars across 197 reviews, the lowest rating here, though it screens at a genuinely massive scale, over 60 million applicants in 2024 alone.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For TA managers who track time-to-hire closely, did automating reference checks actually shave real days off the process, or just move the waiting to a different part of the pipeline?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 14 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Reference Check reviews on G2 talk about speed and fraud detection as the two things TA managers actually weigh against each other here. Automating the reference request and follow-up cycle removes the waiting-on-a-person delay, but whether that actually shaves real days off time-to-hire depends on where the bottleneck was to begin with, since a fast reference process still waits on the reference actually being available. The fraud detection layer, the kind Xref and HiPeople both build in, is really answering a different question than speed, whether the reference itself can be trusted, and a faster process that returns a less reliable reference isn&#39;t actually a win for a TA manager who has to stand behind the hire.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Zinc&#39;s country coverage and direct government integration point to a different kind of value entirely, reducing manual document chasing across borders, which matters most for TA managers hiring internationally rather than for a typical domestic hiring cycle. The post&#39;s own closing question is the sharper one here, since automating a step doesn&#39;t help if the wait just moves to whichever part of the process still depends on a person responding.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 13 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4