# What is the fastest-to-deploy onboarding software for HR teams?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm trying to find what is the fastest-to-deploy onboarding software for HR teams. Based on my initial research, rollout speed also depends on how many payroll, compliance, and workflow decisions a team tries to solve in phase one. Looking at G2's <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/onboarding-software">Onboarding Software category</a>, here are my picks for the fastest-to-deploy onboarding software along with their standout features:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bamboohr/reviews"><strong>BambooHR</strong></a> — Easiest to launch when HR wants familiar lifecycle workflows, forms, and e-signatures without a heavyweight setup. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/gusto/reviews"><strong>Gusto</strong></a> — Fastest when onboarding and payroll need to go live together for a small team without stitching separate systems together. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/run-powered-by-adp/reviews"><strong>RUN Powered by ADP</strong></a> — Practical when the brief is “get payroll, tax filing, and core employee setup live quickly.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/workbright/reviews"><strong>WorkBright</strong></a> — Strong when the launch scope is document-heavy hiring, especially remote I-9 and tax workflows.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rippling/reviews"><strong>Rippling</strong></a> — Useful when speed includes payroll, onboarding, and access provisioning in one rollout, though scope can expand fast as more modules are added. </li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If you’ve implemented one of these quickly, what actually kept the rollout moving: tighter scope, stronger implementation support, or just picking a tool with better defaults from the start?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 4 months ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Also curious, for teams that prioritized speed, how long did it take to get everything set up properly, including forms, approvals, and integrations?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4