# What is the best instant messaging software for remote collaboration?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">While working through a few remote setups recently, I’ve been trying to understand what are the best instant messaging software for remote collaboration, especially for teams spread across time zones. What surprised me is how different these tools feel once you start using them regularly. Some are built for quick, real-time conversations, while others feel more structured. That difference seems to shape how teams communicate more than any single feature.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">While I was going through options in the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/business-instant-messaging"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/business-instant-messaging">business instant messaging software</a> space, tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Webex App kept coming up early, they feel quite different once you get into how teams actually use them.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/slack/reviews"><strong>Slack</strong></a><strong>: </strong>Flexible with channels and integrations, making it easy to organize team conversations. Curious how teams keep things structured as channels grow.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-teams/reviews"><strong>Microsoft Teams</strong></a><strong>: </strong>Well-integrated within the Microsoft ecosystem and built for structured collaboration. Interesting how teams balance depth with quick communication.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/webex-app/reviews"><strong>Webex App</strong></a><strong>: </strong>Combines messaging, meetings, and calling in one platform. Wondering how it holds up for everyday chat compared to chat-first tools.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zoom-workplace/reviews"><strong>Zoom Workplace</strong></a><strong>: </strong>Brings chat into a broader collaboration workspace with meetings and docs. Curious how often teams rely on it as their primary messaging tool.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mattermost/reviews"><strong>Mattermost</strong></a><strong>: </strong>Offers strong control and customization, especially for self-hosted setups. Interested in how that impacts day-to-day usability.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rocket-chat/reviews"><strong>Rocket.Chat</strong></a><strong>: </strong>Focused on flexibility and data ownership with customizable deployments. It would be good to understand how teams balance control with ease of use.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The more I look into this, the more it feels like the challenge isn’t just picking a tool, it’s figuring out how you want your team to communicate. For those using these day to day, what’s been the hardest part to manage over time? I’m curious what only becomes obvious after you’ve lived with a tool for a while.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1




## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4